|
2004/10/17-18 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:34171 Activity:nil |
10/16 Super Rich Step Into Political Vacuum http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38722-2004Oct16.html |
2004/10/17-18 [Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:34172 Activity:low 50%like:34173 |
10/16 Gang of Illegal Aliens Abducted by Aliens http://www.us.com.org/breaking/news/aliens/aliens \_ why do you hate immigrants? are you a republican? |
2004/10/17-18 [Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:34173 Activity:very high 50%like:34172 |
10/16 NC Woman Gang Raped by Seven Illegal Aliens http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=30 \_ Americans for Legal Immigration? What next, Americans for the Safe and Legal Relocation of the Jewish People to Community Camps? Americans for Repatriation of African-Americans to Africa? I can't wait for these yahoos to finally get all of the illegal labor in California deported; the farmers are going to belly-up faster than a goldfish in your hot tub. \_ Your contention is that 11-12 million illegals all work in agriculture? Why has the real cost of these products fallen? The use of illegal labor distors market incentives and discourages technological innovation. Furthermore, the use of illegal labor suppreses wages of the poor, including the sacrosanct mascot minority groups, and pushes any costs of employment onto the tax payers. Lastly, your argument seems to be you want a slave so you can have cheap strawberries and lawn service - is that it? \_ No, you silly fruit loop, my contention is that the same people who complain, loudly, about illegal immigrants here in the states tend to be the same hypocrites who benefit from having the illegals here. If you reformed agriculture in CA such that you made people pay all of their employees a decent minimum wage, two things would happen: 1) your food prices would go up, and 2) there would no longer be an incentive to hire the legions of illegal immigrants who are currently earning $2 a day because they can't cry foul to the cops without getting deported. \_ No, I am sorry, I don't buy that argument. Just because I happen to want strawberries some day doesn't mean I have to buy the entire system that brings strawberries to my table. I am not morally required to be an activist with my wallet, though I certainly understand such activists. I find it interesting that the issue of illegal immigration would lose a lot of its current urgency with a smaller, more libertarian government (Since the illegals wouldn't be competing for a piece of taxation pie to which they don't add themselves, like right now. They would just come to work and contribute to the economy). -- ilyas |
2004/10/17-18 [Transportation/Car/RoadHogs] UID:34174 Activity:nil |
10/16 Fleeing SUV Suspected of Carrying Illegal Immigrants Causes 11-Car Crash, Killing Six in Ariz. http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGB46V8JE0E.html |
2004/10/17-18 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:34175 Activity:very high |
10/14 http://electoral-vote.com shows that there are only a few Strong Kerry states while there are many many Strong Bush states. Kerry is doomed! 4 more years of Bush, 4 more years of doom! Wrong. 4 more years of freedom! _/ \_ 4 more years of freedom fries! -John \_ Uhm, yeah. If Kerry takes florida (which is a tie), he wins the election. You're either an idiot, a troll, or a right wingnut. \_ Uhm, yeah. If you've been watching the polls you would know that Florida has been polling more to the Bush side than the Kerry side as a rule. If Kerry takes Texas he wins the election! Don't bet your money on a single poll from an oddball source. Desire does not create reality. \_ You should do your homework, bub. It doesn't sound like you have. Don't get me wrong, I think Bush is going to win, but I doubt any prediction can reasonably be made at this point with any assurity. \_ I've been reading several poll sites on a daily basis for months, not just the hand chosen stuff at electoral-vote. If you'd like to educate me and demonstrate where I'm wrong and inaccurate, go right ahead. Until then your reply isn't useful. \_ Almost all of the polls have Ohio tied, for the last four weeks. If Kerry wins Ohio, he probably wins. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/oh_polls.html \_ Four more hurricanes! |
2004/10/17-19 [Computer/HW/Display] UID:34176 Activity:low |
10/17 Any recommendations for small (<12") free-standing cheap VGA displays? I need a tiny, unobtrusive monitor for a server. -John \_ how cheap? \_ Under $100 preferably. Something like a 7" car DVD display would be perfect. \_Very difficult unless you find it used. Small sized LCDs are very expensive if they need to be of VGA resolution. Get a 14/15" one if you want new. Otherwise use ebay and look for one. -williamc |
2004/10/17-18 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Troll/Jblack] UID:34177 Activity:nil |
10/16 Freeper Link Storm Detected on Soda http://www.biteme.com/you/irritating/troll.html |
2004/10/17-18 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:34178 Activity:very high |
10/14 So I watched Outfoxed and thought it was really cool, until the last bit of the film when it creditted http://moveon.org. Now I know it's just another damned left wingnut propaganda film. \_ I heard O'Reilly likes phone sex is this true? \_ you are teh gay:w \_ So, truth is entirely dependent on where it comes from? \_ truth is closer when you have a non-biased party observing and reporting. While Foxed is not Fair and Balanced, neither is Outfoxed, which is supported by a biased party \_ You are an idiot. \_ well? are you going to explain why he's an idiot? \_ he disagrees with the correct political thought. he is an idiot. \_ oh, come on. anyone who can actually watch that entire documentary, and then just think it's partisan because of something they saw in the credits is living in a fucking cave. the whole thread is probably just a troll by someone who's bored and doesn't care one way or the other, but you are still a moron. \_ excellent documentary. It got me thinking about the shows they broadcast and how they fit into the executives' agenda. Take the show Cops for example. It repeatedly shows you that blacks and hispanics are bad drug dealers. Look at their kids show. Buffy. The OC. Whitie good. Minorities bad. If you have more examples please respond to this thread. ok thx. \_ Um. There is a reason there are a lot of blacks and hispanics on Cops. Media bias, however, ain't it. -- ilyas \_ There are more total numbers of white criminals than black and hispanic criminals. \_ In major urban areas - no. \_ Yes and if you want to do the same analysis of other stations you'll find similar results in regards to both racial profiling in TV shows going back decades before Fox existed to today and news reporting that fits into the executives agenda. \_ Not that I'm defending Fox, but Buffy was on the WB. And what about shows like Friends and Will and Grace? Those are supposed to take place in NYC, yet there were no non-white major characters. As a person-of-color, I find that far more offensive than the OC (which is supposed to take place in the white part of Orange County) or even Cops. \_ there are no unbaised and neutral sources. all sources, all reporting, all documentaries are biased. the intelligent person understands this. \_ You are correct insofar as no human being can be completely without bias or opinion. However, it is the purpose of journalism to report facts (also known as news). When all of the relevant facts are provided, the general public can make informed opinions about the matter. Calm and objective editing is the key. Fox completely lacks this. Other news orgs simply slip every once in a while. Cf. the documentary "Control Room," a rather objective look at Al Jazeera's coverage of the sack of Baghdad. \_ big evil corporation from Rupert Murdock and Sinclair support Bush and broadcast anti-Kerry materials. Don't the Democrats have friends in mass media? \_ Sinclair owns roughly 1/4 of the stations. The other 3/4 are anti-Bush & pro-Kerry. Watch the nightly news to see. \_ You're full of shit. Give some examples of this bias. |
2004/10/17-19 [Industry/Jobs, Politics/Foreign/Europe] UID:34179 Activity:nil |
10/17 Suppose I want to read technical/scientific writing in a foreign language (e.g. French) but I don't have the time or the need to learn how to speak or listen in that language nor do I plan to read anything non-technical. Is there any short-cut learning method or resource for this? \_ It's really pretty easy. Get a French-English dictionary (or http://wordreference.com/fr find something technical to read, and start reading. When you find conjugated words that aren't in the dictionary, run them through Babelfish to find the dictionary forms; after a few you'll start being able to guess them. You'll pick up the technical terms quickly since you already know what they mean, and soon you'll be able to read pretty fast using the dictionary. It works for math papers, at least. \_ You know, it's not such a bad thing to learn a foreign language. But if you need to read something in a hurry, you can always google translate it. \_ Do scientists still use latin as the universal language? or maybe try: http://www.worldlingo.com/wl/translate \_ Just have Trinity download the language directly into your brain. |
2004/10/17-19 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:34180 Activity:nil |
10/17 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6268250 Mainstream metropolitan newspapers endorse Kerry, back-country redneck middle American newspapers endorse Bush. \_ *LAUGH* Bait harder! |
2004/10/17 [Reference/RealEstate] UID:34181 Activity:nil |
10/17 I seem to be breeding drosophila like crazy in my apartment. is it possible to make a few bucks by selling them to biologists? |
2004/10/17-18 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/California/Arnold] UID:34182 Activity:moderate |
10/17 what does it mean to register as a Rep/Demo? Is it used for statistics or something? How about registering as one party and then voting as another party, is that allowed? \_ In most states you can't vote in the primary of a party unless you're registered. Since leaving Ca, I've registered for a party just so I can vote in the primary. Where I live, whoever wins the Demo primary wins the general election by such a large margin that the whole election *is* the primary, and you don't really get a vote unless you're registered Democrat. Does this suck? yes, it does. \_ Ever heard of the secret ballot? We've got that in this country. So how exactly would they "not allow" you to vote for whomever you wish? I mean, please! \_ thanks for your response. I'm not a citizen so I don't know these things but I hope to vote once I get my citizenship. So here is my second question. Say there is a party A and a party B. I hate party B, so can I register as party B and pick the most incompetent person for the primary, and come the general election, vote for party A? Is that illegal? -op \_ it's not illegal, but it makes you a jackass. I believe that the most responsible thing to do as a citizen is to vote in whatever primary matters (e.g. republican in 2000, dem in 2004) and vote for whoever you actually think would make the best candidate. If democrats had followed your strategy in 2000, they would have probably picked Bush as the weaker candidate...but gues what? he won, and most dems would probably agree we'd be a hell of a lot better off with president McCain right now. Whether you're a democratic-leaning voter or not is beside the point. Republicans would probably have voted for Dean in this election, but you have to ask yourself...are you *sure* your guy can beat the guy you think is weak? what if you're wrong? \_ I actually practice cross-party voting in the primary all the time. In 2000, I voted for McCain in the Primary, even though I wanted Gore to win; in 2002, I voted for Simon in in the Primary even though I wanted Davis to win (and yes, that was a worrying gamble). I look forward to an open primary system at some point so I can stop filing all of this paperwork. \_ Here's the part where someone posts an anti-Davis rant. Come on folks, NOBODY liked that guy. \_ Maybe you did not realize it, but you did vote for Davis if you voted against the recall. That was a special case where you could vote twice. \_ Yes, we SO need a Davis/Ah-nold flamewar right now! I know you can do it! Motd's greatest hits comin' back atcha! \_ There's nothing to flame about. No one is going to defend Davis. No one is that stupid. \_ You obviously weren't reading the motd during the recall shitrain [borrowing this term from Hunter S. Thompson because it is so appropriate.] \_ Sure. \_ No, it is not illegal. \_ sounds complicated. what is the objective for doing so? |
2004/10/17-18 [Uncategorized] UID:34183 Activity:nil |
10/17 What's the deal with @berkeley.edu addresses? Are they available for alumni types? Where can I get mine? \_ <DEAD>calmail.berkeley.edu<DEAD>, only available for students and staff \_ okay, thanks. \_ <DEAD>cal.berkeley.edu<DEAD>, available for all alumni. |
2004/10/17-18 [Transportation/Car] UID:34184 Activity:nil |
10/17 The manual for my car says that I should get the air bag system checked 10 years after manufacture of the car. And it's been 10 years. So, how important is this? How expensive is this? And where would I get this done? \_ uh... maybe you should call the dealership \_ important if you expect to have airbags protect you. there are electrical contacts to corrode, highly combustible chemicals to degrade, fabric to age, sensors to fail, and no chance for a practice run. |
2004/10/17-18 [Reference/History/WW2/Germany] UID:34185 Activity:nil |
10/17 Let's all take a moment to thank the Motd Hygiene Nazi for saving us from having to read the fruit fly troll. Thanks, MHN! |
2004/10/17-18 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:34186 Activity:very high |
10/17 A Bush debate bounce? WTF? http://www.pollingreport.com \_ I call it the Team America: World Police bounce. \_ so is it a pro-Bush movie? Trey Parker/Matt Stone pro-Bush? \_ I think I read that it's less anti-republican than anti-democrat. But niether Bush nor Kerry appear in the film. \_ I think both sides got bashed very fairly and accurately. The important difference is who can laugh at themselves or not. \_ Trey and Matt hate conservatives, but they REALLY hate liberals. The movie is pro-Bush. \_ Trey and Matt, like Vice magazine, are WAY past their sell-by date. Nihilism is so 2000. \_ Who do they like then? \_ Who cares? They don't. They just want to trivialize anyone who genuinely cares about anything (c.f. South Park episode about Mormons). They are aggressive nihilists. And yes, I guess I just don't "get it." \_ Trey and Matt are libertarian. \_ Trey and Matt are system-buckers. They like to get a rise, and modern liberals are easy to get a rise out of with a minimum of effort. It's easy to lampoon the Right, but it's hard to tell if the Right gets it sometimes. \_ All your election are belong to Rove. \_ All your electronic ballot are delivered to Rove by Diebold. |
3/15 |