|
2004/9/12 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/Korea] UID:33476 Activity:nil |
9/11 Mushroom cloud over NK (probably not a nuke): http://tinyurl.com/6sr6h \_ thanks, I dont read the news |
2004/9/12-13 [Computer/SW/Languages/Web] UID:33477 Activity:nil |
9/12 Does anyone have any good PHP learning sites that they could recommend to a webdesigner that doesn't have programming experience? So far, http://php.net and webmonkey seem to be pretty good. \_ http://www.w3schools.com |
2004/9/12-13 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:33478 Activity:very high |
9/12 How can you still believe the media is not left wing biased? http://www.suntimes.com/output/steyn/cst-edt-steyn12.html \_ FFS, media are not biased either way. They print shit that will get stupid people riled up enough to buy papers. Individual media (Fox maybe, don't know, never paid much attention to it, we don't get it over here) are probably biased, or at least their management or editorial staff are, but news are calculated to make money. Repeat after me: newspapers are not (generally) lobbying tools. They are businesses. -John \_ are you really this stupid? Swift Boat got way more coverage than Texans for Truth have. -tom \_ Only after Kerry responded. They ignored it for weeks until they couldn't any more. \_ Please! Look at all the anti-gun lawsuits that get front page and then page 10 when they are dismissed. \_ How do you explain the Bush administration exposing intelligence operatives TWICE and the media not covering it much? The media is just a mouthpiece for very conservative corporations, it just has liberal reporters. \_ It was everywhere and the only item in the news for weeks. It is still being investigated so there is nothing "new" to report. Everytime they get the tiniest bit of anything this is brought up again. Please try a different story if you want to make that claim. It is simply ludicrous to claim right wing media bias. Don't even bother. \_ Are you saying that media is NOT controlled by giant corporations which are inherently conservative? \_ Giant corporations are not inherently conservative. This is a fallacy. \_ conservative was probably a bad word choice. multinationals support the repubs because they're the ones pushing tort reform and deregulation (read "neutering the courts" and "lawlessness") \_ Yeah suing for hot coffee is reasonable \_ Clinton? NAFTA? The truth is that big companies are always fiscally conservative, but where they land socially can vary a lot. \_ NYT slaps researchers who say business headlines biased against Republicans. link:csua.org/u/8zy \_ I'm confused. Are you being sarcastic or stupid? |
2004/9/12-13 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:33479 Activity:high |
9/12 Did anyone go to the Cal game? Did you hear California Triumph? Was it good? \_ Went to the game. Cal had a hard time getting started, then passed for a bazillion yards and trounced the Aggies' defense. Cal gave the Aggies a pity goal near the end. A great Cal game. \_ You misunderstood the question. I was asking about a song, not the game. \_ Sounded fine to me! \_ There are a lot of college fight songs. I think "Fight for California," "Big C," and "Stanford Jonah" are all top-notch, as college fight songs go. "California Triumph" sounded pretty middle-of-the-road. Maybe once there are words it will seem more compelling. -tom |
2004/9/12-13 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush, ERROR, uid:33480, category id '18005#3.5' has no name! , ] UID:33480 Activity:high |
9/12 Why is the story surrounding fake ANG memos presented by CBS and 60 minutes not receiving more coverage? The story has huge implications. \_ It was front page news on CNN for two days. You'll probably see more once they get a better idea who produced them. What more do you want? \_ There is no left wing media bias. Please ignore fake memos and swift boat vets behind the curtains. Thank you. You shall be escorted from the building by security. Have a nice day. \_ Yeah, I am sure they are real. Makes perfect since he got an honorable discharge. Afterwards, he threw his medals over the White House fence as well. \_ If they aren't real, then the white house should come out and say it. That they haven't should tell you alot. \_ What? No it doesn't. It's supposedly a secret memo this guy wrote and hid. How would Bush know if it was a forgery or not better than anyone else? He never would have seen the document before. Dang, I think I've been trolled. \_ Hid? They came up in FOIA requests. \_ URL for this claim? \_ Sorry I was wrong. They were supposedly from Killian's personal files, but they are marked "for record". As FOIA requests in regards to this matter are all funneled through the white house, we won't know until the presidency changes hands. |
2004/9/12-13 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux, Computer/SW/Graphics] UID:33481 Activity:kinda low |
9/12 For those who use LaTeX, what do you use to create diagrams of vector graphics? I don't want to insert a bitmap if I don't have to. \_ I make all my graphics in Adobe Illustrator, then save them as .eps and include them in the document with \figure. I also include graphs from various other programs, and I just make sure they're all exported as .eps files. \_ I've always used MS Visio. If you have access to it, you should try it. It's very easy to use, surprisingly powerful, and you can export to a variety of formats, including .eps. \_ Have used Illustrator, Visio, and OS X's OmniGraffle, all of which work just fine and are recommended. \_ I used xfig... "unique" UI and all. --dbushong \_ tgif is a lot nicer than xfig. -- ilyas \_ http://www.linuxartist.org/2d.php Look in the "vector programs" section \_ http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue41/gm/musings.html |
2004/9/12-13 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:33482 Activity:high |
9/12 Iranian Republican Guard Official in Tehran University Lecture (Part II): We Plan To Target US Nuclear Warheads on US Soil; Will Take Over England Itself Not Embassy http://www.memritv.org/# \_ When spice flow stops, all eyes will turn to Arrakis. The Baron and the Emperor himself will be forced to deal with us! \_ Oh no! The horror! Hide the women and children! To those of you who have not served, Iran had to convert HAWK for their F-14s because they do not have any working Phoenixes. So yeah, I am worried about them coming over here. \_ Remind me again, how many "volunteers" did they lose 1980-88 walking across Iraqi minefields to clear paths for their army? Right, loads. And pretty convenient for us that Islamic Jihad and Hizbullah (who love us, incididentally, and who're not directly funded by Iran) are not currently recruiting "martyrs" who'd, btw, be real sad to take a few thousand infidels with them for their share of doe-eyed virgins? And equally nice to know that they _haven't_ gotten the Shahab-3 up to 1300km in range (and it's _not_ based on the No Dong -- great choice of names there, Dear Leader -- so we can be sure they're _not_ talking to the North Koreans, who've _not_ gotten the Taepodong2 to 3700 miles in range.) So yeah, great for us that those dang F-14s aren't working right. On the other hand, as long as they're busy pounding tables and spewing macho bullshit ("We *thump* will *thump* bury *thump* you!") instead of actually doing something about it, I don't think hot air ever won a war. -John \_ Seoul will be leveled by arty in a matter of hours. \_ And when the iron boot comes down in response, nobody's going to come across the Yalu to bail out the KPLA this time. -John \_ Koguryo shall rise again! \_ But China claims that Koguryo was part of Ancient China. \_ #251 (Part 1 of this speech) is pretty amusing too. "Islam and human rights have nothing in common." w00t! Couldn't have said it better myself. \_ it's just as true as christianity and human rights have nothing in common. \_ Huh? Either I don't understand what you mean, or you have no understanding of history. I'm not sure which. \_ huh? God-given rights? \_ i think pp is saying that the statements are equally true because they are both false. \_ The article says "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" which isn't necessarily the same thing as human rights. |
2004/9/12-13 [Recreation/Pets] UID:33483 Activity:moderate |
9/12 I often buy roast chickens. After picking over them there's still bits of meat and fat on the carcass. If I make stock from this, the meat falls off the bones and the bones take on the consistency of dry-rot eaten wood. Is it safe to feed these crumply bones to my dog? I know all about hard bones' danger but these seem harmless. Is this a new source of dog treats? Advice would be welcomed. \_ No. Chicken bones splinter far more than beef or most others. Your dog may cause damage to his digestive system. Most vets will tell you to never give your dog (or cat) chicken bones. \_ I thought cats natually like eating birds. \_ These don't splinter, they crumble under light pressure. \_ Not to be dismissive of your question here (I'm sure somebody knows about this here), but maybe your vet would be a better person to ask? \_ Hear, hear. And don't bother with google. The cooked/raw/never bones controversy is a flamewar unto itself among pet owners. The fact is there's significantly more risk than if they _don't_ eat bones at all, it's just a question of how beneficial they are to their dietary health. (IMO, it's not worth it) |