| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 2004/4/1-2 [Recreation/Humor] UID:12964 Activity:nil Cat_by:auto Edit_by:auto |
4/1 http://www.google.com/jobs/lunar_job.html -John \_ That's hilarious. What do you think they are going to do with with people who actually reply to that? I'm tempted to try just to find out. \_ Don't waste your time. I already applied and got an offer back this afternoon. Now that I'm hiring manager for the new center, I'll be taking new applications for drones in a few weeks. I need someone to test experimental oxygen tanks and space walk suits. Any experience in those areas? \_ i liked their pigeon-assisted technology one from last year better. \_ TCP/IP Over Avian Carrier \_ no, http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html |
| 2004/4/1-2 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Politics/Foreign/Asia/Taiwan] UID:12965 Activity:very high |
4/1 The reason why PRC is keeping quiet about Taiwan election -
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_14/b3877006.htm
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_14/b3877002.htm
\_ because PRC learned its lesson. Last thing they want is TW
nationals rallying against them. If you know anything about
Chinese Communist Party, you should know that when they are being
people rally against them. If you know anything about Chinese
quiet, that is when you should be REALLY worry about them.
\_ This article is filled with "I'm a moron" spin. Another
way you could spin it is that Chen's share of the vote increased
from ~ 35-40% from the 2000 election to ~ 50% for 2004, China
would find its own stability problematic if it decided to attack
Taiwan and disrupt business, everyone in Taiwan already knew
the referendums were totally political anyway, and whatever China
has or hasn't done, Chen has been re-elected. In fact, I would
say that China has realized its previously asinine diplomatic
approaches have been replaced with something more reasonable.
\_ why the range of 35-40% ? he got 39% in 2000 in a 3-way race.
\_ maybe because I couldn't remember what the exact percentage
was?
\_ let's say if taiwan declares independence, and prc takes
over all taiwan linked assets and factories in china, and
cuts off all trade with taiwan (prc being taiwan's biggest
export market). is this a cost taiwan is willing to bear
to move from status quo to independence? for how long?
\_ What if then the US freezes all trade to China? Is this a
cost China is willing to bear by being aggressive to Taiwan?
For how long?
\_ Fat chance. That would wreck our economy. If China
attacked Taiwan, we'd make a lot of noise and let them
burn.
\_ In order for China to attack Taiwan, it will need to
mass forces. The U.S. will deploy a couple aircraft
carriers, deterring the amphibious assault. China will
need a credible anti-carrier capability, which is why
it's developing GPS-guided cruise missiles. If the U.S.
can somehow manage to maintain combat superiority,
China won't even try to mass forces. In the
mean time, the U.S. is hoping China and Taiwan will
develop business links to an extent that neither will
want to disrupt the trade relationship.
\_ I doubt China will try to invade Taiwan. Instead,
it may shoot a few missiles, send it's submarine
fleet around Taiwan and warn other countries to
refrain from sailing their ships there. This
would bring the US fleet near Taiwan, and then
who knows what will happen. US will likely be
pressuring Taiwan to backtrack on independence
\_ Fat chance. That would wreck our economy. If China
attacked Taiwan, we'd make a lot of noise and let them
burn.
mean time, the U.S. is hoping China and Taiwan will
develop business links to an extent that neither will
want to disrupt the trade relationship.
at that point. Die hard Taiwan independence
advocates will wish the posturing will escalate
into a war between US and prc.
\_ The PRC is a loooong way from even thinking about
being able to take on the US Navy. They might
sink a few ships but they'll lose *everything*
they've spent 20+ years building up in a few hours
and they know it. If it was otherwise they would
have attacked already.
\_ clueless one. the prc doesn't need to take
on the US Navy. All they need is to cut
off all trade with Taiwan and Taiwan is
economically dead.
\_ So is China. China wouldn't cut off it's
nose to spite their face. Don't call me
clueless until you've demonstrated superior
knowledge or ability. You've failed on both
counts thus far. China has only 2 options
to retake Taiwan. The Taiwanese vote to go
back which is less likely each day or they
invade.
\_ Can't you just accept that people like political
Communist Party, you should know that when they are being
quiet, that is when you should be REALLY worry about them.
be forced to do.
\_ nobody mentioned anything about "attack".
\_ It isn't even a choice. It's the minimal PRC would
be forced to do.
\_ "forced to do", hmmm.
\_ exactly. which part of it do you not understand?
\_ That's a lot of "if's". Taiwan will not declare independence;
rather, Chen will say it was always independent, so there was
nothing to declare anyway. The question you should be asking
is, what if Chen passes a new constitution, and that's a big
if, too.
\_ Chen will push and push, but PRC will finally draw a line,
and that's what I am referring to above. stop nitpicking,
and wasting words.
if, too. And if a new constitution were passed, I have a hard
time believing that China would follow up with what you said.
I would say this path would lead to war with the U.S., and
China wouldn't want to take that chance, since they know
they would be beat by the U.S., and they wouldn't want to
lose face in any withdrawal.
freedoms, people like personal freedoms,
they don't want the half-assed Hong Kong "Basic
Law" situation -- and they want anyone who would
take away those freedoms to go to hell?
Just ask all the KMT protesters (even though
they're all wrong).
\_ Taiwan already has political and personal
freedoms. Taiwan independence is a
possible option in theory. In reality
the cost is too high, especially
when Taiwan already has all the freedoms
under the current status quo.
\_ Except for the constant threat of Chinese
invasion, yeah, sort of.
\_ the problem has always been how to
deal with the threat. burying your
skull in the sand doesn't help.
\_ It isn't even a choice. It's the minimal PRC would
be forced to do.
\_ That's a lot of "if's". Taiwan will not declare independence;
rather, Chen will say it was always independent, so there was
nothing to declare anyway. The question you should be asking
is, what if Chen passes a new constitution, and that's a big
if, too. And if a new constitution were passed, I have a hard
time believing that China would follow up with what you said.
I would say this path would lead to war with the U.S., and
China wouldn't want to take that chance, since they know
they would be beat by the U.S., and they wouldn't want to
lose face in any withdrawal.
\_ chen can push and push, but prc will draw a line somewhere,
and then the above actions is the minimal that the prc
will do. It may be all at once or one step at a time
but it will go on until taiwan backs down. it doesn't
need to fire a shot, and taiwan's economy would be in
ruins. Is that a cost taiwan is willing to pay to go
from status quo (note: nobody is talking about being
subject to prc rule here) to independence? United
States has been protecting Taiwan for the past half
a century. Instead of being grateful, should Taiwan
insist on demanding that Americans spill blood for
them, moving in a direction that would be economically
devastating to Taiwan, China, US and all east asian
nations? President Bush has repeatedly pleaded with
Chen to tone down because Chen's actions are not in the
interest of the United States.
\_ It's just a matter of time. One day China will be
strong enough to go for it. Taiwan can't do a thing to
stop that. When that day comes the US can defend or not
defend Taiwan. If the US chooses to defend Taiwan then
pray the Chinese have underestimated US navy power. If
the US backs down it is the end of US super power status
and the start of another 50 year cold war the whole
world will suffer through.
\_ Last two posters, will you please speak in specifics?
"One day China will be strong enough to go for it".
I could just as easily say: One day China will
have a democratic revolution, and Taiwan will join
China's democracy once everything has settled down.
Both seem equally believable to me, especially since
China is *vastly* outclassed by U.S. naval and
air power, and the U.S. will make a good effort
to keep up its military superiority if China
advances far enough.
\_ Specifically, "go for it" = "invade". You could
just as easily say your butt is made of green
cheese (just like the moon), but it is not equally
likely. If you find the cheese theory and the
China invasion theory equally believable then I've
got a bridge in Florida to sell you. China doesnt
have to have a better navy/af. They only have to
be superior in the local region. If they can
pull a fast one and cripple local US navy forces
and put a few 10s of thousands of men on Taiwan
before US reinforcements can show up they've won.
There will be some bogus peace treaty signed and
Taiwan will vanish into the history books as a
minor blurb in some grey side panel box.
\_ Die hard Taiwan independence supporters doesn't
care whether China becomes democratic or not.
They want independence at all cost. They are
driven in a large part by past hatred rather
than a vision for the future.
\_ Quick question, what's wrong with wanting
independence for its own sake? -- ilyas
\_ Exactly. I'm with you on that one.
\_ look, if you can magically turn china
into a brunei, then go ahead with
independence with my full support.
Unlike freedoms or democracy, which
is by nature good, political
independence is neutral in itself.
Its merits is dependent on how well it
will work for the people in practice.
\_ China will never be militarily stronger than the
US. The problem is, it doesn't need to be. It
can totally screw up Taiwan's economic livelihood
without firing a shot. Stop trolling.
\_ Never? Ever? History is full of dead and
defeated super powers that would rule the world
*forever* or so they thought. No one on this
thread is trolling. Some of us simply disagree
with you. That is *not* trolling. You want
trolls? There are plenty of trolls on the other
motd threads right now, but not here.
\_ Except that the world is now just a big
village. And in a small contained
world, once one party attains the upper
hand, it will only get stronger and
stronger. |
| 2004/4/1 [Uncategorized/Multicategory] UID:12966 Activity:nil |
4/1 http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/41/gastron.shtml |
| 2004/4/1 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:12967 Activity:nil |
4/1 Bush and Cheney wed!
http://www.planetout.com/news/feature.html?sernum=840 |
| 2004/4/1-2 [Computer/Networking] UID:12968 Activity:moderate |
4/1 My DSL modem is about 25 feet from the phone jack. My best download
speed tops out around 1.1Mbit. Would I get much closer to 1.5Mbit if
I use a shorter phone line?
\_ it's more the distance from the DSL station than from your phone
jack. i'm right at the boundary, so i get only 768kbps
\_ Yep. I'm really close and I get 6mbps download.
\_ I hate you.
\_ ISP? DSLExtremeP
\_ It's about $100/month. I don't see it on their
website so I'll ask if you want. Email me @ peterl
\_ It's $60/mo in SoCal if you are close enough to the CO.
\_ I've got Speakeasy, 3mbps down/768kbps up. Service (phone
support and online trouble tickets) is fantastic. I'm
paying about $100/month. I know they offer 6mbps
down/768kbps up for about $10 or $20 more. I'd recommend
them highly. Email me if interested. -dans
\_ Speakeasy is OVER-RATED. |
| 2004/4/1-2 [Science/Biology] UID:12969 Activity:low |
4/1 HAHAHAHAHA OOPS. Another Darwin award winner:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/01/rape.fantasy.reut/index.html
\_ he didn't kill himself.
\_ Okay, potential Darwin award nominee then.
\_ The article says she attacked his testicles. If he can't
reproduce, he's a legitimate candiate.
\_ At least his mind was cool enough to stop and ask, instead of
overwhalmed by the consensual sex he thought he was about the get
and went ahead and raped the woman anyway.
\_ Yeah, he's not that dumb/evil. He made a simple mistake under
highly unusual and salacious circumstances. |
| 2004/4/1-3 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:12970 Activity:nil |
4/1 I subscribe to an audio service that just started providing downloads
for the audio. I'd like to download several files (URL easily
generated algorithmically), but I have to authenticate through a form.
Anyone have an example of how to easily use curl to enter a form and
save cookies so that it can download these files?
\_ once: curl -c cookies.txt '<DEAD>.../?user=...&pass=<DEAD>
many: curl -c cookies.txt -O http://path/to/file
--dbushong
\_ Consider this your lucky day (you do use firefox, right?):
http://www.bengoodger.com/software/tabloader
You just set the extensions of the files you want to autodownload,
then hit ctrl-shift-s (the latter bit is not mentioned prominently,
so I'll repeat it: Ctrl-Shift-S). |
| 2004/4/1 [Uncategorized] UID:12971 Activity:nil |
4/1 RFC 3751 Omniscience Protocol Requirements
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3751.txt |
| 2004/4/1-2 [Uncategorized] UID:12972 Activity:nil |
4/1 Hmm, aljazeera's english site doesn't mention what happened today
in fallujah. Fair and balanced...
\_ I don't think they ever said they were fair and balanced. |
| 2004/4/1-2 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:12973 Activity:low |
4/1 I am so fucking tired of being overwritten that I will gleefully
nuke the motd rather than watch this bullshit continue.
\_ Please use motdedit. Seriously guys, use your head.
\_ Please go fuck yourself. Seriously, dude, fuck you.
\_ Ooh, well reasoned response, you got me.
\_ Slightly more reasoned than suggesting motdedit.
\_ can someone PLEASE change motdedit so that it'll delete the
trailing \s+ in motd left by a dumb ass emacs user? -annoyed vi'er
\- use (setq next-line-max-inserted-newlines 1) --psb
\_ i think he's complaining about emacs users, not that he is
a clueless emacs user who is concerned about his own extras.
\_ Wah wah wah, I am so selfish and childlike that I will
destory the motd rather than use a free tool that makes
it easy to co-operatively use it.
\_ except for the fact that motdedit munges the crap out of the
motd. you get what you pay for.
\_ Good point. I'll use MSWord. -John
\_ At least MSWord can properly lock a shared file. |
| 2004/4/1-2 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:12974 Activity:very high |
4/1 what kind of military strategy would you do in fallujah?
the best one i heard is to set up a camp w/ food and beds
outside the city, cordon the city and empty it out inspecting
each person for weapons, removing weapons from them and searching
the homes for explosives and weapons. Then moving people back in.
\_ TO KRUSH ZEIR ENEMIES, TO SEE ZEM DRIVEN BEFORE YOO, UND TO HEAR
\_ I'm waiting for a Pentagon spokesperson to slip up and call them
Sadamites.
\_ http://www.jengajam.com/r/Saddam-Hey-Ya
ZE LAMENTATION OF ZEIR VOMEN. -Johnan the Barbarian
\_ Iron boot. The place was showered with goodies stolen from the
rest of Iraq for Saddam's entire multi decade tenure. Of course
they're pissed off that they don't get to live well at the expense
of the rest of the country now. They'll never happily go along
with anything. The uprising needs to be crushed utterly and
convincingly. Some only understand and respect force and violence.
It is unfortunate but it is the way it is sometimes. This is one
of those times.
\_ 1 saddaam + 1 saddaam = 2 saddaams
\_ You'd have to cordon off the city before you start building the
camp or else people would get wise and move their weapons. Then
during construction you'd have to make sure that food/water and
\_ I'm a liberal too and I'm not really mad at them. How dare they
kill us nice invaders. Don't they understand we're here to help
them? Maybe to save the village we have to destroy it.
miscelaneous goods can exit/enter the city, wiout weapons being
smuggled out. Then once you clear people, you'd have to make sure
they didn't loot their neighbors houses while they are in the camp.
Then when you're all done you have to make sure people don't just
smuggle in more weapons.
\_ I'm a self-described liberal, and even I would have difficulty
resisting the urge to firebomb Fallujah into rubble right now.
\_ I'm a liberal too and I'm not really mad at them. How dare they
kill us nice invaders. Don't they understand we're here to help
them? Maybe to save the village we have to destroy it.
\_ There's a huge difference between killing someone and shooting
up their vehicle, setting fire to it, fragging the still
living people to the street where you stomp them to death
under foot, hack their bodies to pieces and drag what's left
\_ These "contractors" ride in heavily armed caravans
(for obvious reasons).
through the streets and hang it from a bridge with a big
stupid grin on your face for the cameras.
\_ yea it's much better to drop anti-personnel bombs with
thousands of bomblets from high up in the sky. Much
\_ Just until Americans leave, like in Somalia
\_ Hehe. Why do you hate America?
more civilized.
\_ sorry, not taking the bait or feeding the trolls tonight
\_ Not only were they civilians, they were delivering FOOD TO THE
HUNGRY. They're animals (those Iraqis who did this) and
should be hunted down like animals.
\_ If foreigners invaded America, I would
try to kill them, and I wouldn't be too
\_ Do you feel the same way about how the Italians
treated Mussolini?
concerned if they were officially civilians
or not.
\_ would you attack the French for helping
kick out the British for independence?
\_ I see your point, but that is not
analogous to the situation in Fallujah.
Maybe in the Kurd dominated or even
Sunni dominated regions, but not there.
\_ Hehe, even if their express purpose was
ousting Dubya? You talk about killing, but
a much more civilized way of killing.
I don't think you would have the guts to do
it if it came down to it. -- ilyas
\_ yea, it's much easier to kill when
you are high up in the air, dropping
those smart bombs with lots of
bomblets. the enemy die the same
kind of horrible death, but it is
much more civilized.
\_ The people they killed were just civilians.
\_ I know that. But if you were a Sunni they'd sure look a
lot like invaders to you.
\_ 70% of the Iraqis would rather have the US troops
instead of the UN troops.
\_ Where do you get this figure?
carrying weapons. They are likely to be working closly
\_ Now, now.. There is no right and wrong, only different
cultures.
\_ Zogby polling. --!that person above but saw it
\_ In other news, 38% of all statistics are made up on
\_ try harder
the spot.
\_ this would be funny if uhm well nevermind....
\_ See, this is typical liberal smugness. Iraqis are no
more dumb than you or I (well definitely not as dumb
as you). Saying civilians look like invaders to them
is like saying _their_ civilians look like terrorists
to us, and we should just hang up a few as an example
to others. Idiot.
\_ Perhaps you read me too literaly. I wasn't
\_ (1) stop sending in unarmored vehicles without escort
(put up roadblocks to prevent someone from accidentally
doing this)
(2) do the standard sweep they've always been doing, but more
suggesting they were incapable of telling the
difference between a soldier and a civilian. I was
merely saying that from their point of view, both
are equally valid targets.
\_ Well, if they feel that way, I suppose it's
equally valid for us to see them all as valid
targets too. Anyone with half a brain will see
that you can't provoke Americans forever.
\_ Just until Americans leave, like in Somalia
\_ Hehe. Why do you hate America?
\_ You're a piece of shit.
\_ They are all ex-Navy Seals and ex-Rangers. They are
carrying weapons. They are likely to be working closely
with the US military. (indentation corrected)
\_ No, they're actually there as security for business
people from Europe and local politicians.
\_ There are acts of resistance I am willing to accept. The
immolation, dismemberment, and hanging of anyone, armed
combatant or civilian, is inhuman and deserves no
excusing. This was barbarism, pure and simple. -SDL
\_ Do you feel the same way about how the Italians
treated Mussolini?
\_ Of course. It was barbaric. -!SDL
\_ No, they're aren't stupid, they knew. They thought
"Hey, here are some white guys who can't fight back
Boo-yah!" That's just plain old murder.
\_ From their point of view, the US government it the
embodiment of evil. If they were on the motd, they
\_ send in the Terminators
would probably say it's in line with French
partisans killing members of the Vichy Government.
\_ Which would still be wrong when you stomp them
to death, set them afire and hang them from a
bridge. Is there any case of that in France?
\_ Cough. These weren't just civilians. These were
armed security contractors, US mercenaries.
\_ SO, in other words, they were working for
Iraqis... That makes it SO much more
reasonable to kill them.
\_ Hmmm... US Mercenary = Working for the US.
\_ No, they worked for local politicians and
EU businessmen as security.
\_ useless, weapons will flow right back in. best way is to
use fense and towers to divide the city into small sections.
costly though. the unfortunate truth is that, yes, saddam is
a brutal dictator, but the 5m Sunnis like him, and so we have
a 5m hostile population supporting guerilla activities. our
invasion is detrimental to them.
\_ No this is NOT LIKE VIETNAM.
\_ of course it isn't, but still we should do it right
and do it cleanly, the more weapons we destroy the less
will be available.
\_ actually it is like vietnam. even the casualty rate is
comparable to vietnam. Note that the hostile population
under occupation (and in the north) in vietnam is like 10
times the 5m sunnis, and vietnam war lasted about 7 years.
600*10*7 gives 42000.
\_ hahaa, go back to the books cuz you don't know squat
about vietnam, rates are nowhere near
\_ try harder
\_ I did the math. The rates are 1/10th Vietnam rates.
\_ I am more interested in how US military fares
against guerilla warfare compared to during
vietnam times. I have to conclude it's not
much better given that the hostile population
of 5m Sunnis is 1/10th the number of the
50m hostile vietnamese and the number of
casualties per year is also about 1/10th.
This demonstrates the limitation of US power
as an occupational force. In conventional
warfare it now reigns supreme, but not in
guerilla warfare.
\_ The number of local people has nothing to do
with anything. Your analogy is false. Anyway,
the total number of American deaths so far is
trivial (except to the dead and their families
of course, but militarily meaningless). The US,
Brits, and Canadians lost over 5000 men at DDay
on just the first day. That was considered a
great success and much lower first *day* losses
than expected. Militarily, we're not only not
losing but completely kicked and continue to
kick ass in Iraq. The resistence is 99.9999%
ineffective. The problems are diplomatic and
due to domestic weakness and lack of will on the
part of a minority segment of the American
population.
\_ False. The size of the hostile population
means everything. That's why we cannot
allow the shiites to turn hostile too.
otherwise we are screwed. Your D-Day
analogy is the one that's ludicrous.
\_ Nuke 'em.
\_ i think the new war technics will likely involve crowd control
and more police like tactics. Moving innocent civilians cleanly
and safely to root out the bad guys is where new technology
and new strategy will come in.
\_ None of these will work. They either require huge amounts of
manpower that the US can't/won't provide or they greatly subvert
positive gains the US has made. And if you start popping off
civilians, you're just making things worse.
\_ (1) stop sending in unarmored vehicles without escort
(put up roadblocks to prevent someone from accidentally
doing this)
(2) do the standard sweep they've always been doing, but more |
| 2004/4/1-3 [Uncategorized] UID:12975 Activity:nil |
4/1 Is it possible to use G++'s -g (debug symbols) flag with a project
that is incrementally linked? Any pointers? |
| 2004/4/1-2 [Recreation/Activities] UID:12976 Activity:nil |
4/1 Will we get any more snow in Tahoe this month?
\_ link:www.weather.com/weather/local/USCA0584
\_ light dusting of snow this morning. |
| 2004/4/1-2 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:12977 Activity:low |
4/1 I have heard it stated that our (the US's) system of
Plurality/Majority elections discourage people from voting. Now,
I can see the reasoning here (I hate both presidential canidates)
but I was curious if this claim can be backed up with numbers.
Possiably comparing places of similar culture and
circumstance that use the diffrent types of voting.
\_ I'd say that's probably a specious opinion that was stated
without much evidence to support it. There's a lot of other,
move provable reasons for the decline in voter interest in
the US. Also rarely mentioned, but a factor in decreased voter
registration over the past 30 years has been an increase in
immigrant, non-citizen population relative to citizens.
I'm not trying to race-bait here, and its not nearly the only
factor, but its often ignored when people decry decreasing voter
participation.
\_ Interesting. Actually, that raises another question. Why
do people think that immigration has anything to do with
race? I've met immigrants of all manner of races, even...
*gasp* white.
\_ *I* don't think it has anything to do with race, of course.
I was trying to head off the usual motd flame war. Not that
it will help.
\_ So you're saying the ratio of immigrant to citizen is too many?
\_ I didn't say that. You're putting words in my mouth. I was
just citing it as a partial reason for decreasing voter
registration. In fact, if you take this into account, voter
registration amongst _those eligible to register_ hasn't
declined significantly since the 1970s. Of course, it declined
markedly from, say, the 40s to the 70s in real terms. I have
no problem with immigration. Its more of an argument for
urging people to become citizens and participate in the process
than anything else.
\_ Countries with proportional-representation-based voting systems
have higher voter turn-out than countries that use first past the
post (like the US).
More info: http://www.fairvote.org/turnout/index.html
\_ People don't vote because they think their vote doesn't matter. It
really is just that simple. |
| 2004/4/1-2 [Uncategorized] UID:12978 Activity:nil |
4/1 What were Cartman and his followers chanting in the new South Park? |
| 2004/4/1 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA] UID:12979 Activity:nil |
4/1 Today is the unofficial CSUA Twink Day. List your favorite twinks
and tell us why you like/dislike them:
achoi/choice:
\_ nice guy, smart, and contributed to csua /bin
cmlee:
\_ posts clueless stuff
kchang:
\_ asian immigrant lila aaron psb!
tom: ...
\_ "you're dumb because you disagree with me" |
| 2004/4/1-2 [Computer/SW/SpamAssassin] UID:12980 Activity:high |
4/1 Spammer gets seven years in prison:
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/040402/325/eq4ri.html
\_ Should be shot. |
| 2004/4/1-2 [Uncategorized] UID:12981 Activity:high |
4/1 teen posts nude photos of herself, charged with child pornography and
child abuse: http://www.postgazette.com/breaking/20040329pornp6.asp
\_ classic example of a big government running amok |
| 2004/4/1 [Uncategorized] UID:29894 Activity:nil |
3/31 OK, I'm bored, so here goes:
http://www.jengajam.com/r/Saddam-Hey-Ya |
| 2004/4/1 [Uncategorized] UID:29895 Activity:nil |
3/31 Interesting/sad - woman motorcycling through the ruins near
chernobyl.
http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/chapter1.html |
| 2004/4/1 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:29896 Activity:nil |
3/31 GWB: Invigorating America's Youth:
http://www.overspun.com/video/AmericasYouth.rm |
| 2004/4/1 [Uncategorized] UID:29897 Activity:nil |
3/31 Whatever gets you off, I guess (work safe):
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/040331/325/eq0k4.html |
| 5/17 |