|
2004/3/21-22 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:12782 Activity:insanely high |
3/19 Rumsfeld 'wanted to bomb Iraq' after 9/11 http://csua.org/u/6iv 'But Mr Clarke, who is expected to testify on Tuesday before a federal panel reviewing the attacks, said Mr Rumsfeld complained in the meeting that "there aren't any good targets in Afghanistan and there are lots of good targets in Iraq." A spokesman for Mr Rumsfeld last night said he could not comment immediately."' \_ tell me why would the UN want to give up its exploitation of making millions off Saddam and the Oil for Food program? what incentive for the UN to get rid of IRAQ's saddam when they are making millions. You want nothing more than to put the \_ Okay Mr. Smarty Pants whay was your strategy for Iraqi people back under oppression so that the UN can make millions more off the poor Iraqi people exploiting the Oil for Food program. \_ lovely \_ What's wrong with this, liberal? \_ What's wrong? That Dubya and Co. tried to use the national tragedy to push their own agendas? \_ Okay Mr. Smarty Pants what was your strategy for \_ Okay Mr. Smarty Pants whay was your strategy for dealing with terror and cleaning up the cesspool of the Middle East; this is incumbent on those who criticise. No cogent alternative was ever \_ how about dealing with Israeli/Palestine issue directly and more even-handedly? \_ Um, how about the simple observation that Iraq didn't have any involvement at all in Al Qaeda or the WTC? Bombing Iraq as a response to that is asinine. \_ Um, you are plain wrong. Iraq actually did (and still does) have ties with Al Qaeda. Soldiers during the war actually came across a number of terrorist training camps during the war. This is pretty well documented. \_ Show me the documents so I can laugh at them. I never saw them. I did see things about camps in Saudi Arabia. \_ There were plenty of cogent alternatives advocated. Hussain's neighbors didn't consider him a threat. Our own analyists didn't consider him a threat. Hussain was not connected to radical Islamists. It was and remains quite clear that invading Iraq had nothing to do with dealing with terror. \_ And what exactly were those alternatives? Was it to continue to sit on our hands while Iraq continued to violate UN rules and regulations? Do you really believe the UN would have actually done something about the problem? Are you that naive? Do you have no sense of history? \_ Hussein's neighbors didn't consider him a threat *to them*. I'm not one of his neighbors and I doubt you are/were either. Which of 'our own analysts' are you refering to? And yes there are documents out there that show the national fascists and Islamic fascists had considered working together. Since our intel was so poor due to cuts in the 90s we can't really know what was going on back then. The best way to deal with terror is to overthrow the socialist fascists that run the middle east and replace them with non-Islamic democracies that won't \_ I can't believe you have such simplistic view of the world. If you actually read 18-19th century, you might find that much of the africa was conquered by the western democracies. How about Britian's Opium War against China? How about French's conquest of Indochina and Algeria? The truth is, Democracy, set by western europe and Americans, are interwined with Imperialism. Countries fell victim of imperialism (including China, numerous of southeast asian nations, and much of the middleeast) tend to equate imperalism and democracy. When they look for ways to modernize themselves, they tend to look for anything but imperalism related ideals. Many choose communism (eg N. Korea, Vietnam, and to some extent, China), many choose religious fundamentalism for solution. put up with that shit. Only then will the Arab people advance and terrorism fade. It's people like you who want to keep the Arab people down who create and foster future generations of terrorists. \_ The "if only everyone had government structure X (which just happens to be the same structure I live under), then there would be no more conflict" argument goes back the beginning of time. I see no particular reason to think that this time, but truly, the argument is right. \_ It's a well-documented historical fact that democracies rarely, if ever, fight each other. Democracy does promote peace, the problem is establishing democracy in a society which has never seen it before. Look how well it worked in Russia... -- ilyas \_ Or China. The primary arrogance of American foreign policy since the beginning of time is to simply assume as axiomatic that all people want and need Democracy, and that all governments are in some way drawn towards this conclusion as a natural matter of course. \_ Those arrogant optimistic Americans. A pox on them. -- ilyas \_ you erase my post, I erase yours advocated. |
2004/3/21-22 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:12783 Activity:moderate |
3/19 Today's contest: name the country which _didn't_ have any protests against the US invasion of Iraq: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/03/20/international1233EST0513.DTL \_ Kiribati. \_ Can anyone shrink the url? I can't copy and paste this. \_ Kids these days and their problem-solving skills... \_ I'm sorry, but you're joking right? Isn't this the *computer science* undergraduate assocation? \_ My country Singapore never had any protests against it, but then it never had protests against anything. \_ China. You must be doing something right when the only countries that does not protest against you are Singapore and China, models of democracy. \_ Israel, of course. |
2004/3/21-22 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/Taiwan, Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:12784 Activity:high |
3/21 the motd stuff about Taiwan was pretty interesting, which csua-Chinese-nationalist deleted it? \_ No, some asshole deleted a part of the thread, so the entire thing was nuked in retaliation. Nothing to do with Taiwan, it was motd pettiness all the way. \_ You named the wrong nationalist. \_ [ chicom troll will be deleted on sight from now on. ] \_ [ that and the broken english ] \_ good. you've illustrated my point. DPP rigged the election and anyone who doesn't agree is labeled as "chicom" \_ Congratulations, junior, you have the power to label anyone chicom and obliterate their posts. Power to you. \_ I was the last one posting on that thread before it got killed by someone who couldn't take criticism of DPP. I thought of restoring it but then remembered it's just the motd. You can look it up in the archive. |
2004/3/21 [Recreation/Media] UID:12785 Activity:nil |
3/21 http://busty.pl/html/preview.html When are we invading Poland? I volunteer. |
2004/3/21-23 [Computer/Networking] UID:12786 Activity:low |
3/21 Anyone need a dsl modem? I've got an alcatel 1000 adsl modem kicking around that I'm not using. Seems worth about 10 bucks on ebay. Come pick it up and it is yours. Buy me a beer and it is yours with a smile. -aspolito \_ Heh, I have three of them just lying around. Seems like SBC gives one out everytime you sign up. -williamc \_ Alcatel 1000 is infamous for locking up periodically. And I think it also had a security hole as well. |
2004/3/21-22 [Recreation/Food/Alcohol] UID:12787 Activity:nil |
3/19 How many beer bottles are in a case of beer? \_ 24? \_ or 12 \_ it depends on how drunk I am. \_ 12 bottles or 24 cans |
2004/3/21-23 [Consumer/CellPhone] UID:12788 Activity:nil |
3/21 I have a lot of old cell phones. They are from 5 years old to maybe 2 years old. I don't need them. Is there a charity or some other good use for these? I am not sure if they can still be used. They all have SPRINT logos on them, but the phones are made by Motorola, Kyocera, and such. --dim \_ when I worked at motorola, they collect old cell phones for domestic abuse victims. don't know if it's this organization (I am still using my first cell phone (a clunky old startac)): http://www.wirelessfoundation.org/DonateAPhone Try a "donate a cell phone" google search for more choices but I guess you know that already. \_ http://accrc.org also takes used cell phones. The older ones are probably scrap, but they'll dispose of them in an enviornmentally-correct way for free. \_ i dumped a couple of my old phones at a local verizon store. they give you some tax writeoff and will redistribute them to domestic abuse victims. |
2004/3/21-22 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux, Computer/SW/OS/SCO] UID:12789 Activity:kinda low |
3/21 Does anyone know the deal on this whole SCO/Linux thing? Has SCO told anyone the specific code they think is stolen? Is it stolen or copied? What is the deal here anyway? Couldn't Linux just rewrite the code in question and the situation out be dead? \_ kids these days and their researching skills... \_ So far, every single line of code they showed turned out to be BSD code, public domain code, genuine Linux code, and similar. I think the claim of copied code was just a PR campaign to convince the laymen that indeed something apparently has been copied from SCO. The crux of SCO's case I think is that they're accusing IBM of donating to Linux code that they claim has been "derived" from the original Unix code, such as the JFS file systems. Maybe I am wrong, you might want to list all the recent SCO-related articles on slashdot, to get the idea .. \_ SCO didn't want to release the code because they knew these hacker geeks will do exactly that. SCO is desperate and looking for way to milk money out of other people's hard work. \_ Microsoft's puppet... to push people towards Windoze http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/36017.html \_ I'll assume you're not trolling for a moment: assuming SCO is right and code was stolen, changing it after the fact doesn't zero any previous damage done to SCO's business. It *does* limit future damage but the past is the past. I no longer believe they have a case *but* if they did a rewrite won't save anyone from being sued and paying penalties for previous theft. \_ In a civil tort, the plaintiff has a duty to try and minimize their damages. Since the open-source community basically told them "show us the code and we'll fix it", SCO will have a hard time claiming damages from the period after they notified the community. They had an opportunity to to have people fix the problem, for free, and they wouldn't identify the code. |
2004/3/21-23 [Computer/HW/CPU, Computer/Networking, Computer/HW/Drives] UID:12790 Activity:moderate |
3/21 I have two computers, a p3-133 and a p3-500. They are taking up precious space and gathering dust. Is there any worthwhile cause to donate them to? If I can't turn them on should I bother taking out the harddrives and whacking the fuck out of them with a hammer first? \_ Computers for schools will take the p3-500. No one but an old lady who wants to use the internet will take the 133. \_ Would you sell the p3-500? I'm interested in buying. \_ email me -aspolito \_ http://accrc.org \_ There's no such thing as a p3-133. You mean a P-133 or P2-233? Either way, a 133 could be easily turned into a firewall/router. \_ I dunno what it is. I bought it in 97 or 98 or so and I probably haven't turned it on this millenium. I seem to remember 133. I'm not really curious enough to look, I just want it out of my closet. \_ It's a Pentium from about 1994 if it's 133 mhz. A 233 from then *could* be a Pentium but more likely a P-II. \_ Don't whack the hard drives. Even small hard drives are useful for a computer for the poor or 3rd world. If you're worried about data, boot from a Linux floppy and do dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hda \_ Elitist prick! They need food and condoms and free aids drugs not your old hard drive! Think of the children! \_ There's no such thing as a p3-133. It could be easily turned into a firewall/router. |
2004/3/21-22 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:12791 Activity:nil |
3/21 Kerry Supporters at NYC Peace Protest http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1102246/posts?page=1,50 |