|
2004/3/12-13 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux] UID:12634 Activity:high |
3/12 RedHat, Suse, or Debian? I am seriously thinking of installing one on my machine... \_ Free RedHat as you know is has reached it's end. RedHat 9 was the last of it. There will still be RedHat Professional, which is RHEL but only costs $90. I highly recommend Fedora if you want to keep up with the latest and greatest in Linux. http://fedora.redhat.com -shac \_ Die SuSe ich nicht fur die motdhozen unt warezhausen. \_ USE LINUX! \_ have you used linux before? you can start with Knoppix. It doesn't touch your harddrive, just boots from a CD and runs. it's useful for those who want to taste linux before they actually commit to it \_ Yes, I've used slackware back in the old days... \_ RIDE BIKE! \_ Debian. It's a communitty, not a corporation. It's the easiest to maintain. Once you've installed it, you can upgrade everything, including the kernel. No need to reinstall a net version later. \_ Suse detects the hardware for you, with Debian, do I have to know what my hardware is? \_ You want hardware detection? Install Knoppix. Knoppix is a Debian distro. Boot from the cd, then do a hdx-install. Knoppix is the best HW detecting distro I've seen. Then use apt-get to get up to date. Did that the other day at the office, was the easiest linux install yet. \_ Debian's hw detection isn't as good as SuSE, but it is fairly good. (SuSE isn't perfect either, we've had lots of problems with video cards/fb's with SuSE 8.1, 9 and SLES). \_ I don't understand why all distributions don't have the exact same quality for HW detection. Aren't the routines open source and GPL?? \_ So? That doesn't mean everyone uses the same one. Each distribution has its own installer. \_ Yes, yes, but underneath what is the excuse for not borrowing the HW detection code for different parts from each other? Why reinvent the wheel? Isn't that supposed to be one of the benefits of OS? \_ Not everyone wants to build all the bits the same way. RH and SuSE build the bits differently (incorporating different patches, testing different kernel versions, glibc version, XFree86 fb drivers, &c.). RH's hw detection requires you to have things built in the same way as RH builds them, since SuSE (and Debian) do things differently (for various reasons, i18n/l10n, stability, &c.) RH's stuff won't work for other distros. \_ what? I'm talking about HW detection, not how drivers are installed or what version. The hardware is the same. So why don't they all *detect* the HW to the same level of quality? \_ which one is debian's hd detection? it doesn't detect much for me.. do i need to run it manually? \_ Hardware is usually obvious. Read the numbers on the chips. and '/sbin/lspci'. Google for specs. \_ If you have never used Linux before but have some familiarity with svr4 type systems (Solaris, HP-UX), then I would recommend RH 8 or 9. RH is easy to setup and provides a pretty good learning environment to get comfortable with Linux. If you want to deploy RH for some real purpose you may start running into problems with their default tool-chain (RH has shipped with buggy snapshot jvms and gcc versions instead of stable versions) and RPM-hell. If you have already used Linux, try Debian; it isn't as easy to get running but it is far more stable than RH and is much easier to maintain (apt is very nice). I've heard good things about Debian-Gentoo which is supposed to provide /usr/src and /usr/ports type source access but I haven't tried it out yet. \_ it's just gentoo, it's got nothing to do with debian. \_ Sorry my mistake. Someone at work told me that Gentoo was part of the Debian GNU/{Linux,HURD} stuff. \_ Define what you mean by "RPM hell" \_ i imagine rpm hell is the situation where you're trying to install an rpm not built by redhat inc. and there is a bunch of other dependencies you have to find rpms for. this doesn't happen in debian or gentoo because they have centralized repositories for this stuff. \_ Rpm dependency handling is problem. Rpm determines the dependencies of an rpm on files and libraries when the rpm is built. If the system that you are installing the rpm on has a different set of files and libraries (say you've applied some security/stability patches) than the system the rpm was built on you often run into install problems forcing you to use --force or --nodeps which can leave your rpm db in an inconsistent state. RH frequently releases updates that must be installed in some specific order otherwise you can't install all the updates. The problem is also present in commercial pgms that try and build one set of rpms for a large set of systems (RH 6 and newer and most versions of SuSE). \_ What are you using now? *BSD? *Windows? \_ http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/10.0/features URL self-explanatory. \_ Isn't that French? Plus it has all that gay star/magic motif. cf. TV magic queers. \_ you'd rather be running "potato"? \_ woody ! \_ forget mr potato head, go with the sarge! \_ Try it. \_ Debian. It's maintained by a communitty, not a corporation. It's the most efficient to maintain. Once you've installed it, you can upgrade everything, including the kernel. No need to reinstall a new version later. \_ You should use SCO UNIX. \_ I like Suse, but ymmv. I'd stay away from RedHat because they've abandoned non-commercial users. \_ I don't have time to mess with Linux now. Back when I did, Mandrake was actually the first one I tried. I don't really see the point of Mandrake now, it seems redundant. If I was going to use one now I'd probably go with Gentoo. I don't know what I'd use for "real work". |
2004/3/12-13 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China] UID:12635 Activity:high |
3/12 Why does the Chinese govt. care about forcing WiFi chipset makers to support WAPI? Is it beaurocrat muscle-flexing, technical advantages of the spec, or added dissident-spying features? \_ They know they have a lot of market muscle. So they want to use that to help the Chinese tech industry. Foreign companies have to license WAPI from China and basically share technical know-how when implementing it. There's no real technical reason for it. They're trying to do this with DVDs as well, with their "EVD". I understand the logic, but still think it's a bad way to go about it. When they split the market for everything it's just annoying for people who travel, and for companies who need to make the different versions. But hey, more useless tech jobs for us! \_ The reason is actually a lot benign than that. China, like rest of the (semi-conductor) manufacturing powerhouse, need to pay royalties for producing equipment that is in compliant of the standards adopted by the West. This Royalties and license fees can be a significant cost to the equipment they manufacturs. Unlike Korea, or Taiwan or Singapore, which essentially said: "we got bullied, but there is nothing we can do about it." China is flexing its market muscle, coming up with thier own standards so they don't have to pay those IP-related fees. Wifi is just one of many moves that China made recently (heard of TDS-CDMA?). Where to go from here is anyone's guess. If I am the Premier of China, I would eventually use these home-grown stardards to influence the existing one, thus, neogiate a better term for licensing technology such as GSM and other specifications. However, there is an undercurrent of unreasonable national pride beneath all these, which may cause Chinese market isolated from rest of the world... similiar to what happened to USA and Japan. And... China's market is going to be too big to be ignored by anyone and thus, they can get away with all that. \_ I was unaware that there are royalties for WEP... \_ I thought WEP encryption was lame anyway? \_ Everyone keeps saying China's market is too big to ignore but doesn't most of China still live in small villages growing rice? \_ you are correct. the rural urban breakup has gone from 80-20 to 70-30, but it is still mostly rural. OTOH, 30% of 1.3 billion ain't bad. WSJ says China is already the world's biggest beer market. I didn't read the details but I would guess it's by volume consumed not average price * volume consumed, cause they drink quite a bit of cheap local brew. \_ So are you saying the 'China is a huge market' thing is for real or bullshit? \_ I am saying it's a huge market for beer. \_ But only cheap local beer, right? of 1.3 billion ain't bad. \_ Well said. \_ So it's basically "We're really big. If you want to sell us stuff you'll have to give us tech know-how and a discount on royalties." \_ the WSJ had a story a few weeks ago about how GE wanted to sell power turbines to the Chinese market, but in return the Chinese government wanted significant discounts AND the plans to the technology used in making the turbines so they can make it themselves cheaper down the road, stuff that GE has invested billions in over the years. \_ Was GE stupid enough to do this? \_ According to the article, they reached a compromise - some technology transfer but the most leading edge part was kept secret. GE had to compromise a little because otherwise China will just go to European companies. The good thing is, as the article noted, often the transferred technology quickly becomes outdated as even newer technology becomes available. The technology itself is important, but even more important is the ability to invent new technologies. \_ I remember the article quoting a chinese manager saying that, in technology transfers, the foreign companies show them what to do, but not why they do it, and not how they discover to invent new technologies. that's the way to do it. |
2004/3/12 [Finance/Investment] UID:12636 Activity:nil 75%like:29867 |
3/12 What's the best/cheapest online brokerage these days? \_ freetrade offers 20 free trades per month. \_ I use scottrade, which is cost effective if you don't trade often. But if you trade more than twice and less than seven times a month, I have a co-worker who started using sharebuilder for a flat monthly fee. \_ OByermom \_ I've been using Ameritrade for some time. I don't know if they are the cheapest but I've never had problems with them and they provide an acct exec for people with more that $50k so that you have someone to talk to if there are any issues with your acct. |
2004/3/12 [Transportation/Car/RoadHogs, Transportation/Car/Hybrid] UID:12637 Activity:very high |
3/12 I know this is a liberal pipe-dream, but imagine that, instead of spending $87B on Iraq every year, hundreds of billions on tax cuts, and the prescription drug [company] benefit, we spent $300B a year on a simple program: Hand in any car that gets less than 30 MPG and you can go out and buy a 50+ MPG hybrid car for FREE. We could replace 15 million cars a year on this program, and oil imports would soon drop like a rock ... This seems a lot simpler than invading country after country, plus domestic car manufacturers would quickly start cranking out competing models so it would help the car industry too. People want to drive big SUVs, not hybrids but I'll bet plenty of people would switch if you get a new car for FREE. \_ Ok, great, and where does the power come from for these cars? Hybrid cars dont make power from thin air. It's a hybrid of a gas engine and a battery. The power for the battery comes from either energy drained off the gas engine and thus reduces MPG and/or from an electric socket. The power for that socket comes from...? Yep, you guessed it, burning oil, coal, or nuclear. I won't even go into the abuse your program will cause when we suddenly see the price of broken ancient $150 gas guzzlers go up just so people can turn them in, nor will I mention that oil is not the source of Islamic terrorism. It isn't a liberal pipe-dream. It is just a pipe-dream. \_ I don't think the point of an electric or electric-hybrid car is to get energy for free. It's to improve efficiency. Electric cars (that plug into a socket) use energy generated from a gas turbine power plant (or nuclear, solar, hydroelectric,etc.). Gas turbine engines are far more fuel efficient than piston engines. Hybrid cars work under the principle of using a low power engine (which tend to be more efficient than a high powered one) and using that to recharge a battery. \_ plus the battery allows regenerative braking, and shutting off the engine quickly when idle. \_ Pretty much no hybrids on the market are built to recharge from an outside electricity source -- you are thinking or pure EVs, which are pretty much on hold. OP is referring to the reduction in required petro due to increased fuel efficiency alone and he is correct that the change would be dramatic. Hybrids can get double the mileage of standard vehicles. \_ Most of the milegage gain is from making the cars lighter. \_ Must research before talking out of ass. Apples vs. apples, hybrids are heavier. http://www.hondacars.com/models/specifications.asp?ModelName=Civic+Hybrid http://www.hondacars.com/models/specifications.asp?ModelName=Civic+Sedan \_ Let's assume we replace around 20% of all cars (because not everyone can or wants to trade-in). We'd cut automotive petroleum use around 10%, and total petroleum use ~5%. We'd probably replace ~30 million cars at a cost of ~$60 billion. $60 billion seems a bit high for a 5% drop in oil use. \_ To my mind that depends how much of a petro decrease would be sufficient to no longer require massive military operations every few years. The cost of the current Gulf adventure is at about $105B. \_ We're not there for the sweet,sweet oil. We're there to battle Islamic terrorists who were operating freely under a secular Stalinist dictatorship. \_ Whoah. Somebody believes this? \_ It's probably just sarcasm, but yes, some people actually believe this. \_ The 105 includes Afghanistan but anyway.... \_ No. Total appropriations in the two wars so far have been about $150b. \_ Oh, I thought you meant the current war plus afghanistan, not gw1+gw2 and not afghanistan. The numbers are similar. \_ The 105B is for Iraq alone, but anyway... http://costofwar.com/numbers.html \_ It's always fun to play with numbers. You do understand that a lot of that money would have been spent on people, weapon's maintenance and training anyway, right? Probably not, but it's cool to think you know what you're talking about. Gives you that "I'm smarter than you" feeling of superiority even if it's false. \_ I like that idea, but I think there is a better way to spend the money. How about instead of buying efficient cars for everyone, we give everyone a lobotomy so they won't _like_ gas-guzzlers (and while we are at it, we can make sure they won't discriminate based on race, or want a handgun in their home). In fact, we might as well make sure they will all agree abortions are ok. Sure, it will be expensive, and there is a slight loss of free will, but think of how much better off our society will be! -- ilyas \_ that was an awesome ilyas style rant. it's quite easy to poke fun at people truly concerned with how global energy resources are being rapidly depleted without offering anything remotely like a viable solution by somehow linking this all to gun ownership, abortion, and paranoid extreme libertarian sexual fantasies. \_ (a) The op was a troll, not a concerned citizen. Buying everyone a hybrid is a stupid idea for practical reasons (as others pointed out), as well as moral reasons. (b) I do have an alternative. Do nothing (at the government level). Let's check back in 20 years to see who is right. If I am wrong, I ll eat my words, like Mr. O'Reilly did. Will you? You didn't even sign your name. -- ilyas \_ [ non-sequitur deleted ] \_ Did that deletion make you feel better, though? \_ The non-sequitur wasn't really insulting, but it was random. Patriot Act? wtf? \_ Ah. So ilyas jumps from hybrids to lobotomies to abortion, but my extending his statement about "loss of free will" to the most recent source of govt infringement of civil liberties is a non sequitur. Just making sure I follow. \_ You are barking up the wrong tree. I don't like the Patriot Act. I also don't like grand schemes for 'societal betterment' at taxpayer expense, which was the point I was trying to make in that clumsy way of mine. Also, I was under the impression the main danger of the Patriot Act was the increase in spying powers of the government, rather than explicit prohibitions. The only possible relevance explicit prohibitions. -- ilyas of PA to op's post is that it is "a bad thing the conservatives did" rather than "a bad thing a liberal is proposing we do." You can always make another thread to laugh at conservative stupidity, there is plenty to go around. -- ilyas \_ Invading Iraq is a pretty grand scheme and it has cost a fortune. So far the big results are: Saddam Hussein in jail so he can no longer \_ Your reaction is very interesting, ilyas, especially all the extensions you make. Did somebody maybe press a button? which use Li, not Pb. threaten us with non-existant WMD, Iraq going from oil exporter to oil importer, everyone in the world even MORE pissed off at us, and 500+ soldiers dead. My point was, if we are going to spend billions and billions of dollars, why not just spend directly on stuff that we know will actually make a difference as opposed to stuff that might fix problems. \_ I thought I was the only conservative isolationist on the motd. Did you vote for Pat, too? \_ Hybrids are a ruse. They make people feel better about wasting resources--it's like residential recycling programs, which make practically no impact on resource usage. If we really wanted 50 MPG cars, we could do that with or without making them hybrid, and hybrids have additional toxic waste problems. -tom \_ By toxic waste, surely you're not refering to the batteries, which use Li, not Pb. \_ Yes, some smaller cars are already close to 50mpg but it would mean making them even smaller and lighter which seems unsafe. \_ bigger, heavier cars are more dangerous than smaller, lighter cars. \_ no. \_ do you not understand the concept of kinetic energy? |
2004/3/12 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:12638 Activity:low |
3/12 Can't his advisors get Kerry to STFU and stop mouthing off? http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040312-120719-7926r.htm \_ Can't his advisors get Reverend Moon to stop trying to destroy our government? |
2004/3/12 [Computer/Domains] UID:12639 Activity:nil |
3/12 Can I provide a PO Box when registering domain? I didn't find a rule against it. \_ If you've ever done a whois you'll see other people put in all sorts of bullshit. This is the internet, there are no rules. |
2004/3/12 [Computer/Domains] UID:12640 Activity:nil |
3/12 What's the cheapest place for registering a domain (or is there a comparison shopping engine for that?) \_ I really like http://gandi.net. They're pretty cheap and I've never had bad service from them. -John \_ I had one domain with http://godaddy.com and two with <DEAD>stargateinc.net<DEAD>. stargateinc recentely raised their fee whereas godaddy's fee went down since I first registered. I just finished moving two domains from stargate to godaddy as well as registering another one. \_ I've used godaddy in the past. This time I went with joker. Other ones I've looked at were gandi and dotster. NSI can suck it. \_ Why did you not use godaddy this time? The only time I used stargate instead of godaddy last time was because godaddy doesn't provide free dns service. |
2004/3/12 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq, Politics/Foreign/Europe] UID:12641 Activity:low |
3/12 Might be a nice gesture to drop some flowers at the Spanish consulate or something. They were pretty decent 2 1/2 years ago. -John \_ never knew the motd was so kind. what was the motd like on 9/11/2001? \_ IIRC, motd was shut down for several days because of excessive kindness. I believe the unofficial part was made less publicly accessible due to kindness poisoning also. \_ I believe it was given a cooling off period because a few jackasses were talking about taking revenge on any "towelhead" they saw. \_ It was shut down because paolo's (he of the every-3-minute MOTD deletion) girlfriend complained. -tom \_ And she was damned right to do so. Did you read some of the posts she included in her email? It was more than casual race baiting; people were talking about guns. If nothing else, that sort of thing would have gotten the csua shut down if it had been made public. \_ You can't shut down an organization because it provides a forum for wackos. Berkeley won't get shut down because of all the nutjobs on Sproul. In fact, you put yourself at more risk by attempting to control a forum, because then you implicitly are approving everything that shows up in it. -tom \_ I guess a broken clock is right twice a day. \_ Kind of OT, but what kind of relegion is Sihkism? All I know is they don't cut their hair, they wear a turban and carry a ceremonial knife. \_ what do you mean pretty decent 2 1/2 years ago? \_ Meaning that after 9/11 a whole lot of people in Spain and other Euro countries were pretty consoling and tried to make whatever symbolic gestures they could. Not a big deal practically speaking, I guess, but I think it meant a lot to them. Dunno, you decide. -John \_ Have you ever considered putting flowers in front of the Israeli consulate? \_ Because that's not terrorism, it's a war. (and "war on terrorism" doesn't count) \_ oh, so you think it's ok if Israeli rolls in the tanks and just flattens all the arab areas? After all it's war and you've just said that killing civilians is ok. \_ good attempt at a troll. \_ Why does the Basque people want independence from Spain? \_ The usual. They feel they are oppressed and ignored by the Spanish political and social support system. \_ Ask not what you can do for your country but what your country can do for you! \_ Why did the Joos want their own country? |
2004/3/12 [Computer/SW/Languages/Misc] UID:12642 Activity:moderate |
3/12 I'm very very impressed at how quickly the motd formatting god formats my intentionally ill formed posts. I'm wondering if it's actually a croned formatting script or something, and if so, can you please post the script? Thanks. \_ It's no script. \_ That's no moon. |
2004/3/12-13 [Uncategorized] UID:12643 Activity:low |
3/12 Will you ever admit you are depressed? ________________________________________ / Uh, why wouldn't you? Half of the fun \ \ of being depressed is wallowing in it. / ---------------------------------------- \ ^__^ \ (oo)\_______ (__)\ )\/\ ||----w | || || \_ denial stage. \_ can you draw one with primary and secondary sexual characteristics? \_ never heard of cowsay? |
2004/3/12-13 [Finance/Investment] UID:12644 Activity:nil |
3/12 Ugh! Why is the online broker thread deleted?! Stop being a selfish self-important asshole! Recommendation on online brokers - \_ I use both scottrade and ameritrade (datek was bought out). advantages of scottrade: * lower commission for market trades * low key branch offices where you can deal with real people if the need arises (mine have 3 persons there), and you can call them instead of some anonymous call center. advantages of ameritrade: * lower commission for limit trades * shorting works (shorting at scottrade always results in a message saying "please call your branch office", and sometimes they can't get the shares I want even when I call them. * extended hours trading |
2004/3/12-13 [Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus, Computer/SW/Languages/Misc] UID:12645 Activity:nil |
3/12 Iway'may eryvay eryvay impressedway atway owhay icklyquay ethay otdmay ormattingfay odgay ormatsfay may intentionallyway illway ormedfay ostspay. Iway'may onderingway ifway itway'say actuallyway away onedcray ormattingfay iptscray orway omethingsay, andway ifway osay, ancay youay easeplay ostpay ethay iptscray? anksThay \_ It's no script. \_ That's no moon. \_ Why do YOU care? \_ Wow, motdedit fixed up my post pretty funny. This was supposed to be on the Jessica Lynch post, but someone deleted it. I can't say it's any less applicable here though... \_ The motd formatting devil was here \_ I'm pretty sure there is no script as this is a pretty complicated problem (context sensitive flow analysis with statistical inference, etc). However, I do think that whoever does the formatting is equivalent a very complicated finite state automaton that runs in an infinite while loop. \_ it's not that hard. parse the motd looking for a newline followed by a number to get the start of a post, then anytime you see a "\_" or "\-" preceeded by tabs or spaces you get a change in authorship. the actual reformat is trivial. FUCK its hard because there are so many corner cases. For _| U example, suppose I interrupt your line in the middle, then C your parser will get fooled. The other example is if I K start posting in ascii pictures. Then what if I jive your F content? And what if the indentation IS indeed unusual like a C/Java code? ANd what if I use letters I_ to indicate a response? And the list goes on and on, but the point is, it's very easy for the naked eye to catch infinite weird cases, but putting them into smart/self-learning generic rules is just as hard as writing spamassassin. \_ Corner cases? fuck em, its the motd. this isn't one of hilfinger's courses. \_ I am Gunnery Seargent Hartman, your Senior Drill Instructor. From now on, you will speak only when spoken to, and the first and last words out of your filthy sewers will be "Sir!" DO YOU MAGGOTS UNDERSTAND THAT?! \_ SIR YES SIR!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
2004/3/12-14 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:12646 Activity:moderate |
3/12 American Research Group: Kerry Increases Lead Over Bush, Democrats more united than Republicans: http://www.americanresearchgroup.com/presballot \_ If I was a foreigner I'd be cheering positive Kerry news, too. \_ why? foreigners cheer for bush. outsourcing, big trade deficit all good for foreigners. \_ gee, and here the left has spent 3 years telling us how the rest of the world now hates us because of bush. which is it? having your cake and eating it too? don't be stupid. \_ oh, that's mostly just the nato allies, and some moderate used to be friendly muslim nations. But India and the east asian nations love bush. In short, the ones with whom we should have good relationships hate us, while those that take advantage of us love us. Bush screwed up both politically, and economically. \_ not really. Which East Asian (i presume you are talking about north east asian countries) you are talking about? Anti-American sentiment is running all time high here in North East Asia. South Korea's president in North East Asia. South Korea's president won won election on his tougher stands against Americans (even though it's all election rhetrics). In short, many countries think Bush is being a big bully, which has a lot of truth in it. \_ there you go. even s. koreans, who honored the US as an old friend by sending troops to iraq, think the bush gang is a big bully and warmonger. \_ no this is just a case of "what have you done for me lately?" france is the ultimate example of this. without the US france wouldn't exist today. how much thanks do we get for that? its just the way the world is. everyone has their own best interests at heart which makes sense and is the way it should be. this is totally normal and has nothing to do with who the president is. if the rest of the world loved our president i'd wonder why and what it was costing *me* and my country so the president can feel popular around the globe. i'd vote against the residing president on that basis alone. \_ without France, there will be USA today. There are more casuaties on the French side than American soldier during the Revolutionary War. \_ yes and so what? at what point did we backstab france? this has nothing to do on that basis alone. War. with anything i said. \_ huh? so you prefer that the rest of the world hate us like say how they hated the soviet union? that will be proof for you that we have a good president? \_ they didnt hate the soviet union anymore they ever hated us. they were just the other super power and all the little countries you're so concerned about played the 2 off each other for most of the 20th century. hating us isn't proof we have a good president, liking us isn't proof we have a bad president but each is evidence in that direction. \_ Complete bullshit. Who loved the Soviet Union? Pretty much all of Europe admired the USA and most of the rest of the world the bush gang is a big bully and warmonger. on that basis alone. that we have a good president? have a bad president but each is evidence in that direction. too. The USSR was simply an empire, and only opportunist dictators found profit in alliance with it. \_ no one ever said anyone loved the USSR where are you getting this shit from? if youre going to post please try to read what you're replying to and dont reply to your own self created straw man arguments that others never made. \_ I think you've got the two directions confusd. each is evidence of the other direction. And no, it wasn't about playing offthe two superpowers. It had always been about supporting the US for what it respresented. \_ Why are you guys babbling about foreigners? The link is a poll of AMERICANS. \_ Because, if you read a news paper or read it online, you'd know about Kerry's recent quote about unnamed foreign leaders who are pulling for him. Of course this was a provable lie, but hey, it's only politics. |
2004/3/12-13 [Computer/HW/Laptop] UID:12647 Activity:kinda low |
3/12 http://home.comcast.net/~groovyr/HELPDESK.WAV (headphones only) \_ and this friends, is why you remove your HD *before* sending it in for service... oh yea... and have backups anyways. \_ Oh my god -- that's freaking horrible! \_ Ha ha! What a dipshit. Is that for real? It sounds like he says "Canon laptop computer"... I didn't know they make computers. \_ He seemed a bit upset. I sent mine in with the drive but I didn't care if I never saw any of the data again. It came back ok. Poor stupid bastard.... |
2004/3/12-13 [Computer/SW] UID:12648 Activity:nil |
3/12 I want to find the inflation rate and cost of living changes from 2001 to now. Does the government have that on some website? I'm not getting any love from google. Thanks! \_ CPI. Train harder and you will find it on the web. \_ Thanks. I didn't know what it was called. \_ Hitler. \_ WHAT??? |
2004/3/12-14 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Politics/Foreign/Asia/Taiwan] UID:12649 Activity:nil |
3/12 So Taiwan seems to be a pretty developed country, why is it still considered a third world country? \_ state your source. \_ because they are not yet white and the quota for nonwhite is 1. \_ idiot, why do you even bother wasting bits with your racist hateful shit? \_ did you really go to cal? \_ because they don't have the political, economic, military, or diplomatic power to be considered a major power. \_ don't forget the congressional brawls. \_ hey, we've got them too now! - random Korean guy \_ Taiwan is *NOT* a developed region, not even close. For one thing Taiwan is lack of rule of law. This is a major issue which most American has overlooked because it is not as cachy as "democracy" and "human right" etc et. Mind you that rule of law is the fundamental building block of democratic government, and a democracy without rule of law is actually in many ways more chaotic than dictatorial form of government. Things you have taken for granted, such as (relatively) independent judicial branch does not exist here. Law enforcement is selective, tend to be charged with either political motive or influenced by bribe. Infrasture wise, when you step out of Taipei, you will find that Taiwan is still pretty damn underdeveloped. Even in Taipei City... give you an example, the waste water treatment plant just went online recently. Can you imagine a city of 1.7 million live on local septic tanks? Lastly, Taiwan is not a country. The Constitution of Republic of China state that Taiwan is part of China and the constitution is designed for entire China in mind. Read them if you can actually read Chinese. \_ I like that argument for the annexation of Taiwan. "Our Constitution says so!" If only the Germans had amended their Constitution to say Austria, Poland, the Low Lands, France, etc. were a part of the Reich, there wouldn't have been a problem! And before you bring this up, most of those territories (along with Spain) were in fact Hapsburg possessions, and part of the Holy Roman Empire at one point or another. -- ilyas \_ Haha, there may be problems in his argument, but not the one you are dwelling on. He was referrring the consistituion of ROC (i.e. taiwan), which claims it to be part of China. You made fun of yourself, again. \_ Ok. Show me where: http://www.taiwandocuments.org/constitution01.htm -- ilyas \_ I don't have to. I don't care about taiwan or china or roman empire. I just saw you misread another post in such an obvious way and went ahead pouring your vast "intelligence." You should ask the guy to whom you original replied to show that and thank me for helping with your reading comprehension. \_ I don't know. Are you sure you schooled me? Taiwanese constitution doesn't say (or at least I couldn't find anything about this) "Taiwan" is a part of "China". It was merely a non-communist constitution which was meant to apply to all of china once the nationalists won. They never did, and it applies to a small island instead. If you really want your 10 motd points, you can have them, however. -- ilyas \_ The constitution specifically said that no one allowed to alter the soverign territory of the Republic of China, and at the time, the constitution covers entire chinese mainland. and this claus of contitution still exists. - someone who actually can read chinese and read the damn constitution, unlike ilyas \_ It has nothing to do with what any constitution says, but has everything to do with the carrier we want to buy from ebay for you. I donate the 10 points toward its purchase. \_ Tell you what. How about I spare you the trouble of replying to me in the future. I am nothing but a stuck-up, stupid, rabidly libertarian, selfish, blind, easily offended, unattractive, smelly, kooky, ridiculous, no life loser with the attention span and reading comprehension abilities of a 10 year old. I should fuck off and die like my libertarian ilk, and keep my rabid politico-sexual fantasies to myself. Can we just agree on that? I default on all the motd points. Any future argument between us you win automatically. I accept any remotely clever jokes you make at my expense in advance. I surrender unconditionally. -- ilyas \_ You're not allowed to. Sorry, but you lose on losing, too. That's impressive! \_ Yes, outside of the big cities, there are people living at shocking levels of poverty. It's really quite frightening, and the gov. seems uninterested in changing anything. \_ When I swang by the mainland China, I was shocked by the difference in standard of living between the city and the country side (and I didn't even wonder off to any really poor country side neither). For a moment, I thought Taiwan is much better in this regard. Then, I realize that I *RARELY* step outside the Taipei city. \_ just because you rarely see outside of taipei doesn't mean taiwan is full of countrysides with poor rural bumpkins. taiwan is much better in this regard. \_ I don't dispute that. However, Taiwan is much smaller and at least in my view should of done a better job closing the gap between the country side and the city than what is on the table right now. \_ I am not very familiar with Taiwan's government system, but are you sure about your claim that Taiwan does not have an independent judiciary branch? Can you back it up? I read a book or two by Li3 Ao2, and even under KMT rule (under CCG, I presume?), which he sharply criticized, he was able to win case after case in the courts. That would be unthinkable in say, commie China. \_ I am sure, because I live in TW right now and I have heard enough share of horror stories, to a point that I had to constantly remind myself that this is not the way things suppose to work. The supreme court, for example, is extremely weak and they are subject to president's political pressue. This is one of the reason why nobody ever bother to ask the supreme court to interpret the legality of laws and the referendum conducted solely by the president right now. The prosecutor general is essentially a servant of the president. Those who doesn't cooperate, including judges and people on the prosecution team, gets rotated out of the trial while the trial is in progress. \_ When I was in Singapore, I remember once where some international organization reclassified Singapore as a developed nation. The local government controlled media started trumpeting the achievement all over the place. Then PM Lee Kuan Yew spoke up and says Singapore is still a third world country. Lee Kuan Yew is smart because one still gets some advantages (trade, loan, etc.) by being a third world country in name. The government controlled media then did a full reverse course and started pumping out articles on why Singapore is not yet a developed nation. It was kind of funny. \_ Funny in the way that government controlled media is funny. \_ pray tell us how else could it have been funny? \_ exactly my point. \_ Guys, you shouldn't compare everything with US. America is an exceptional country, one which is founded on a sound principle and evolve along a sound trajectory, has always had an unbiased judiciary and a functining democracy. If you have to measure against the US, then no other country is developed. \_ blah blah america is bad, the worlds problems are all our fault and if it wasnt for america the world would be utopia, so lets just raise taxes, slash the military to ribbons and pay off the rest of the world to like us because their liking is us is so important as if international politics was a playground game |
2004/3/12 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:29866 Activity:high |
3/12 http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/South/03/12/jessica.lynch.ap/index.html Why do people care about her still? Actually why did people even care about her in the first place? \_ You're supposed to be thinking about how an innocent GI got rescued, not the poor sods blowing up on a roadside bomb \_ ohhhhhhh. thanks. |
2004/3/12 [Finance/Investment] UID:29867 Activity:nil 75%like:12636 |
3/12 What's the best/cheapest online breakfast these days? \_ freetrade offers 20 free tacos per month. \_ I use scottrade, which is cost effective if you don't trade often. But if you trade more than twice and less than seven times a month, I have a co-worker who started using sharebuilder for a flat monthly fee. \_ OByermom \_ I've been using Ameritrade for some time. I don't know if they are the cheapest but I've never had problems with them and they provide an acct exec for people with more that $50k so that you have someone to talk to if there are any issues with your acct. \_ I use both scottrade and ameritrade (datek was bought out). advantages of scottrade: * lower commission for market trades * low key branch offices where you can deal with real people if the need arises (mine have 3 persons there), and you can call them instead of some anonymous call center. advantages of ameritrade: * lower commission for limit trades * shorting works (shorting at scottrade always results in a message saying "please call your branch office", and sometimes they can't get the shares I want even when I call them. * extended hours trading |
3/15 |