| ||||||
| 2004/2/22 [Computer/SW/Languages/Java, Computer/SW/Languages] UID:12347 Activity:nil |
2/21 http://biz.yahoo.com/bizwk/040220/b3872001mz001_1.html Software War - Deepa Paranjpe vs Stephen Haberman One thing I find funny is how some think the US can keep the design jobs and "people skills" jobs like project management while outsourcing just the boring programming work. I think India will quickly move up the ladder and be able to do everything. \_ pffft, why bother with India? Just take the whole thing to China. Much better trained engineers and they already do all the hardware manufacturing. Add in Taiwanese investment in knowledge and capital into the mix and we'll bury you dot head Indians. \_ you forgot about the language barrier. \_ There's no real language barrier since on the US side we don't talk to the grunt workers, only the 1 project manager. \_ developers that don't talk to each other? you'd better have a fuckin good project manager. \_ The developers talk in mandarin or tamil or whatever. There won't be any developers in the US, they will all be in India or China. |
| 2004/2/22-23 [Uncategorized] UID:12348 Activity:nil |
2/22 Can someone point me to an RFC that specifies which ascii characters
are valid in email addresses? I can't seem to find it in 2821 or
2822. -John
\_ It's scattered around RFC 2822. The actual definition of an email
address (addr-spec) is section 3.4.1, but it refers to a lot of
stuff from earlier in section 3.
\_ Cool, thanks. I noticed that a lot of online email
address parsers reject 'a+b@domain.com'--was just sort of
wondering whether there's anything they're "supposed" to
accept. -John
The upshot is that nearly any ASCII character is allowed if quoted
properly, including whitespace and control characters. The only
thing you can't have at all is a NUL character -- and even that
used to be permitted, so RFC 2822 still requires you to handle it
properly. Non-ASCII characters (anything above 127) are not
allowed; RFC 2047 specifies the =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= syntax for
encoding them.
Of course, you may not want to send mail to anyone belligerent
enough to have control characters in their email address. --mconst
\_ ooooh, sweet. I never thought of that. If I had control chars
in my email address do you think that would avoid all spam? |
| 2004/2/22-23 [Health] UID:12349 Activity:nil |
2/22 Dear motd personal trainer: Is using an elliptical machine as
effective as a treadmill? (the goal is weight loss and i'm worried
about impact on the knees).
\_ why are you considering the elliptical machine over treadmill?
\_ He said "i'm worried about impact on the knees".
\_ I've been losing weight at the rate of about 2lbs per week
largely on an elliptical trainer. I work hard, though: 52
minutes/day in 140-150 heart rate range. If you believe the
calorie count, it is MORE effective than equivalent time/effort
on a treadmill.
\_ Elliptical training is for the weak - the numbers make it
look far more impressive than it is. Stairmaster creams it
by a factor of 2x on a calorie count.
\_ ellipticals are not at all for the weak. they're meant
to be a very low-impact way of getting aerobic exercise.
they work slower than some machines and quicker than
others, but it has nothing to do with being weak or not.
nice try.
\- the stairmasters that have real steps in an infinte loop
rather than the pedals that just go up and down seems
pretty good to me. i ran up those for a couple of months
before heading off to nepal. i also operate those on manual
rather than program modes and just always push pretty
hard with a sprint at the end and maybe a breather now
and then. treadmill with a manually varied slope is also
reasonable, --psb
\_ Calorie count is worthless. You can't lose significant weight
from exercise alone.
\_ My 2lbs per week weight loss and I beg to differ. Is
14 lbs "significant"?
\_ i've been using the elliptical due to knee problems as well,
and it is good at low angle and low resistance, but i have now
found that my knees are again the limiting factor, as my cardio
conditioning is now good enough that i can't get my heart rate
up without causing too much strain on my knees. i've recently
added treadmill to my workouts for short periods of time and so
far my knees have been okay with it, but we'll see! it's a much
more intense cardio workout and if you are interested in training
for actual activity like hiking or whatnot, gives a realistic and
transferrable muscle workout, unlike the elliptical, which has
helped my overall cardio conditioning, but otherwise hasn't really
seemed to help my hiking all that much. -lila |
| 2004/2/22 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:12350 Activity:nil |
2/22 It's official. Ralph Nader is running.
\_ Read the far far far left debating Nader's presidential bid:
http://publish.portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/02/281004.shtml
About the same level of dialog as freerepublic, on the other side.
\_ God dammit. I hope he runs off the edge of a cliff. It's not
worth another 4 years of BushCo just to have a "viable third party"
that no one would want in power anyway!
\_ Actually, it would be great to have a *viable* third party.
One egotistical asshole running as an idependent in a few states
and getting about 1% of the vote has no relation whatsoever to
establishing a viable third party other than making poeple
mistrust future third party attempts, however.
\_ Go Ralphie go! Four more years!
\_ Whee. I wonder how many states will have <1000 vote margins this
year? Freeper and Naderboy should go get drunk together.
\_ When is BushCo going to start donating to Nader's campaign? |
| 2004/2/22-23 [Computer/SW/OS/OsX] UID:12351 Activity:high |
2/22 It seems that iPhoto isn't able to change the resolution of an
image. Does anyone know of a good shareware utility for OS X to
let me do simple image editing like this?
\_ You can crop the photo in Edit mode or do File: Export.
\_ I don't want to crop, but rather change the resolution
to a lower one. -op
\_ **** File: Export. ****
\_ I guess I'm not the only one who thinks iPhoto is pretty dumb.
Reminds me of some article that said something about OSX making
easy tasks easy, but the rest impossible.
\_ Dude: it makes stuff easy for non-computer users.
What do you expect? GUI blowjobs from your keyboard?
It isn't Photoshop light, it is a digital photo album. That's it.
\_ weak troll. There are a million ways to do this on a Mac.
\_ that is the same philosophy as Microsoft Windows' GUI.
Anyway, get FINK installed and then get GIMP installed. Works
fine here.
\- have you used darwin ports rather than fink? i think ports
may have more legs --psb
\_ Haven't tried darwin port but when recently I skimmed over
its packages it seems that its intersection w. fink <<
than their union. As for fink, I haven't been able to
upgrade it since moving to Panther despite following the
"instruction" on fink site. Fortunately, most of the existing
packages still works and did not get removed.
\- i havent given this tremendous thought but i think
the ports system/philosophy is a better approach for
packages that need tighter integration with the OS ...
say X11 or in my case some networking libraries. it is
possible i dont understand all the apple-specific
implications, however. --psb
\_ I just think it shouldn't be so hard.
\_ I use Pixel NHance, which is better than photoshop for a lot
of things. Doesn't resize though. Have you tried iResize?
\- hey do the "less well known" programs have worse generational
loss/re-encoding issues if you rotate/resize/crop etc jpgs
or does everyone use standard functions/algorthms so say a
2degree rotation is photoshop vs. "joe's graphics manipulator"
will be essentially the same. ok tnx. --psb
\_ Try http://www.yellowmug.com
There may be a utility there. If not ask the guy to write one
for you. He responds to emails and may be willing to. He is
a berkeley eecs dude. |
| 2004/2/22-23 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:12352 Activity:nil |
2/22 Who will Cal Deaniacs support now that Dean is out of the race?
\_ I wasn't a Deaniac, but I think most people will do what I do:
not necessary get involved in the process, nor donating money, but
*WILL* do his/her part cast his/her vote to make sure Bush out of
office.
\_ oh yeah? which of the half dozen or so states where your vote
actually matters are you planning to move to before november?
\_ No one can get elected without the support of independent voters.
If you put up some zero like Kerry who has no draw from that
demographic you're doomed. Instead of worrying about the other
guy with that "anyone buy Bush" theme, why don't you support a
real candidate that you actually like? Success will follow.
\_ I'm not the guy above, but there were two candidates who
I actually liked, and they've both left the field before
I even had a chance to vote. By super tuesday, it's
already become a lesser of evils game.
\_ So Deaniacs should just go ahead and vote for Dean in the
general election no matter what? I'm sure that will work.
\_ no, your party already screwed it up by voting for someone
based on their belief about his ability to defeat the
other guy as opposed to their faith in him as a person.
meaning they think they know how independent voters will
vote and tried to second guess them by presenting the
candidate they believed would get the most (I) voters,
but instead ended up with a passionless elitist cog who
is going to get his ass handed to him. as one of those
(I) voters you so badly need I assure you that Kerry isn't
on my short list.
\_ Passionless elitist cog? are you talking about
George Bush, who achieved NOTHING on his own?
got into Harvard with 1200 on SAT, using family
connection to get him out of Vietnam (serving
national guard instead), won presidency by asking
his brother perform what I considered as vote
fraud.
\_ Can you please elaborate on what he 'asked'
his brother to do? Jeb Bush recused himself
from the recount.
\_ As an (I) I'm totally turned off by your anti-Bush
rhetoric. This is exactly the reason you're going
to lose to Bush again. You attack the other guy
but say nothing about why I should vote for your
guy. As an (I) I prefer the evil I know to the
unknown but certain evil of your guy. You don't
even like your own guy, so why should I?
\_ You don't get it. Most of the time, people vote
*AGAINST* someone than *FOR* someone. I have no
idea who Kerry is, but I know that 1. He is not
Bush, and 2. everyone around me who think like me
will vote for him. and that is good enough. For
many of us, nothing can be worse than President Bush
right now.
\_ And your friends are a fair mix of the general voting
public? I doubt it. Give people someone to vote
*for* and you'll see Bush out of office by a landslide
but instead you give us (I) voters no choices.
\_ You need to wake up. Everyone is basically an (I). You
are obviously liberal, therefore you're stuck with the
Democrats. That's the way it is, kid. The conservatives
don't all like Bush either. Kerry and Edwards are the
candidates the most people are comfortable with. They
never act weird like Dean, and have a political history
unlike Clark. Sorry the world is too boring for you.
If you don't like it, voting for a third party doesn't
change anything. It's a lazy way to pretend you actually
care while doing nothing. Just stay home.
\_ I'm not liberal. I'm also not conservative. I am
definitely *not* stuck voting for Kerry. I can stay
home or vote for Bush or Nader or anyone else I like.
I'm not voting for Kerry if I show up.
\_ Go away, Naderboy.
\_ whatever, wrong call.
\_ I'm a decline-to-state and I hate Kerry and Dean both as
well as Bush. If Clark or Kucinich made it I'd probably
vote for them, and perhaps for Edwards. I might vote for
Kucinich anyway. I despise Bush, but I'm not voting Kerry
to keep Bush out of office.
\_ why do you "hate" all those guys? |
| 2004/2/22-23 [Recreation/Activities] UID:12353 Activity:nil |
2/22 I'd like to go backpacking in the Yosemite wilderness in June.
Looking for a good 4-5 day hike that preferably loops back to
the starting location. Recommendations? tia. --sky
\_ maybe you can talk to people at REI?
http://www.swsmtns.com/backpacking_and_survival
\- how tough of a hike are you looking for and what are your
priorities? [avoiding people, seeing the classic views etc].
for classic hike so at hikes out of little ymte valley [tough
to get permits]. fewer people in hetch-hetchy, and hikes out
or Toulemne Medows. the mosquito sitution in jun may be pretty
bad in some higher parts. you will need anti-bear technology--psb
\_ I haven't backpacked since cubscouts, but my gf and I
aren't in horrible shape, so I'd say a medium difficulty
hike. Avoiding people is prolly #1 priority, as well as
actually being able to obtain a permit. thx. --sky
\- getting a first come first serve permit depends a lot
on what day you get there. if midweek, not a problem.
otherwise you might need to stay outside the park and
then drive to the park at liek 7am and get a backcountry
permit for whatever area is avail. rather than loop,
you might want to consider the hub-spoke model [hike in
and then do some day hikes from base camp] ... like say
out of the voglesang area. you may wish to GOOGLE or
AMAZONG for "Yosemite Jeffrey Schaffer". toughness not
just about what you *can* do but what you *want* to do ...
i.e. walk 6+ hrs a day. --psb
\_ thanks partha. --sky |