| WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ | |
 http://csua.com/feed/ | |
| ||||||
| 2003/11/14 [Politics/Domestic/Election] UID:11064 Activity:nil |
11/13 http://www.townhall.com/columnists/robertnovak/rn20031113.shtml This is so great! Ann Coulter talking action figures for sale! God damn, I love the net! You can find anything! |
| 2003/11/14 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:11065 Activity:nil |
11/13 http://tinyurl.com/uya4 "Abandoned" building has owner and textile machinery which got wrecked by US plane strafing it. Or is that a different building? \_ Same building. Is Bush personally directing the strikes? \_ Yes, it's just like Johnson in Vietnam. He's actually on the radio counting down to tell the pilot when to drop each set of bombs. War is so cool when you're the king! |
| 2003/11/14 [Politics/Domestic/California, Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:11066 Activity:nil |
11/13 Anyone else get a California - Microsoft Settlement mail?
what are you going to do about it? (postal mail)
\_ I already sent in my claim. When will we get our money
back?
\_ how did they get all of our mailing addresses?
\_ We are Microsoft. All your info are belong to us!
\_ That's what I'd like to know.
\_ addresses are public info. stop being an ignorant paranoid.
\_ Yes, and I plan to milk them for as much as I can. Is there
somewhere we can look to find out more information about this
settlement/suit?
\_ You need proof you bought something in that time frame. Your
warez copy of office and win2k doesn't count.
\_ It says you don't need a receipt. |
| 2003/11/14 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush, Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:11067 Activity:kinda low |
11/13 The other day on the motd, I said that there are only like 200
guerillas in Iraq. Now, the Bush administration is saying that it's
like 5000. Guess I am wrong. Sorry for being a moron.
\_ Bastard piece of shit. *I* said it was 200-300 and the Bush admin
today said it's more like 3000. Do you have to lie while being an
asshole? I'd rather be wrong than a liar like you. And I didn't
get my 200-300 from the Bush admin. It was my own guess for the
number in the Sunni triangle area, not the entire country.
\_ I am sorry you believe what Bush tells you, too. But thanks for
the apology.
\_ Who do you think you are to not believe what our president
tells us? He is a most honest man. Besides, he got the
data from the most seniorest American commander in the middle
east. Even Christian lass Condoleeza Rice agreed. She never
lies. Have you even been to Iraq?
tells us? He is a most honest man. Besides, he got it from
the most seniorest American commander in the middle east.
Even Christian Condoleeza Rice agreed. She never lies.
Have you even been to Iraq? |
| 2003/11/14 [Reference/History/WW2/Japan] UID:11068 Activity:nil |
11/13 Destroying empty building boost moral. Consider what we and others
has done in the past for devastating other's moral or boost our own
(i.e. drop nuclear bomb, fire bombing defendless Dresen, and killing
300,000 in Nanjing), I would say this is, though stupid, pretty
civilized.
\_ The firebombing of Dresden was done not to boost morale, but to
destroy the enemy willingness to fight. The allies believed,
and Hitler's rhetoric supported this belief, that WWII was a total
war, not just a war between opposing armed forces. The nuclear
bomb was dropped as a message to Stalin, and perhaps to force
the japanese surrender (though there are indications the
japanese were ready to surrender as is).
\_ That is the point. I really hate the idea of doing something
for the purpose of devastating enemy's "willingness to fight."
We've done it in Dresen, German has done it in Russia, and
Japanese have done it in Nanjing. Yet, somehow, only German
got punished. Japanese got a slap on the wrist, and Americans,
some of them (see below) still felt that their action was
justified, not realizing that they have gotten away with
crime against humanity only because they won the war.
\_ No way in hell was it worth the estimated 100,000 American
lives to take the mainland vs any number of Japanese to drop
the bomb. Not 1 American life. The idea that we magically
knew they were ready to surrender and nuked them anyway just
because is pure bullshit.
\_ You may really hate the idea of destroying enemy's
willingness to fight, but that is the essence of war.
Some Sun Tzu and Clausewitz might be helpful.
\_ I agree. When in war, you do what you have to
do to end it quickly.
\_ That's not what Sun Tzu said though.
\_ sounds good enough, but that's what I heard
some generals say.
\_ Powell Doctrine.
\_ The Japanese didn't surrender even after the first bomb hit
Hiroshima. They surrendered only after the second bomb hit
Nagasaki. So they weren't ready to surrender without us bombing.
\_ Dresden was a key transhipment (something ~ 3rd largest) for
the German military. As we all know (or should) war is all
about logistics. It was a valid military target. The Japanese
had ample time and warning to unconditionally surrender.
Realistically invasion of the home islands would have
incurred millions of casualties. There were 300,000+ on
Okinawa alone. We also had to stop the Russians from
entering the war, etc. etc.
\_ (1) "moral" != "morale"
(2) destroying buildings in a "regime change" operation
may undermine morale of the civilian population who
is supposedly on our side. I much prefer bombing
the shit out enemies types of operations as opposed to
gnarly regime change types of operations.
\_ Yea, like when commie chinese attacked commie vietnamese,
they had a really bad time cause the vietnamese were
like very tough after fighting usa for a long time, so
the chinese commie gave up, but instead of like admitting
defeat, they blew up the two vietnamese cities in their hands,
dynamiting like every single damn hutch they found, to
boost morale and show they have big penis.
\_ i forgot. all commies, aside from the size of penis, are all
the same.
\_ Yea, like Microsoft bombed Netscape out of existence and will
soon finish off Realplayer and then screw Google.
And if they can't win, they'll ship old Java.
\_ Screw google. They haven't returned decent results in months.
And Netscape, too, while you're at it. They had given up and
stop improving their browser around version 3.x or 4.x depending
on who you ask while MS continued to work on theirs. Go load up
an old NS and feel the pain. NS sucked and deserved no less
than death by that point.
\_ What about NS 6.x and 7.x?
\_ 7.x is broken mozilla 1.0 and 6.x was unspeakably bad.
Did anyone actually use 6.x if there was any other
choice for their OS? Anyway, by then NS was long gone.
\_ I'm using 7.1 and it seems much better than 4.8 except
bigger memory footprint. |
| 2003/11/14 [Politics/Foreign, Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Others] UID:11069 Activity:nil |
11/13 Ex-Mexican consul arrested in connection with trafficking of
illegal Arab migrants
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1021304/posts
\_ Government Employees (Foreign or Domestic) - The Enemy Within!! |
| 2003/11/14 [Uncategorized] UID:11070 Activity:nil |
11/13 Socket question: how do I reduce the timeout for a socket to connect()? |
| 2003/11/14 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:11071 Activity:nil |
11/13 Is there a politics code (a la the geek code)?
\_ 3 choices: (D) (R) (I)
\_ Yeah man, DRI rules! But Sick of it All is better.
\_ play pac man and i watch TV!
i'm so happy cause it pleases me!
couldn't really ask for anything else
maybe my own chain of taco bells!!!!!!!
\_ my favorite category is poor whites who vote based on coded
appeals to race. boy the republicans are fucking those guys
up the ass.
\_ wow, what a weak ass troll! go home, boy! there's no room for
little boys on this ride. |
| 2003/11/14-15 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/Gay] UID:11072 Activity:high |
11/14 About Judge Moore, I'm curious about the anti-Moore people here.
Moore was elected by the people to his office. Do you think it
is ok that some appointed body removed him from office? If so,
did you think it was *not* ok for the people of CA to vote to
remove an official the people of CA elected? If so, how do you
reconcile that double standard and why place an appointed body
above the will of the people in the greater scheme of things?
What was so wrong about the 10 commandments statue that it required
Moore's immediate removal by an appointed body while we were supposed
to wait until the next election to remove Davis in a time of crisis?
It's 8am. I hope that's not too early to try to start a real non-troll
discussion on a hot topic.
\_ it's worth pointing out that the decision to remove him was a
*unanimous* one, made by a group of legal experts from both the
Democrat and Republican party, which included elected officials.
The issue at stake was not the ten commandments statue, it was
an open contempt for the law.
\_ Judge Moore is a complete moron, I don't see how anyone can
defend him hauling his 10 ton commandments monument
INTO THE ROTUNDA OF THE STATE CAPITAL BUILDING. the
mind boggles.
\_ Yeah. The guy keeps saying that he's being forced to "deny god".
What an absolutely refrickindiculous statement. Hey Christians,
do you have giant statues with biblical crap on them in your
workplace? If not you're denying god and will BURN.
\_ this "judge" reffered to homosexuality as a "violation of the laws
of nature and of nature's God upon which this nation and our laws
are predicated." That means that 10 percent of the Alabama
citizens who walk through his courtroom door have already commited
a mortal sin in his eyes before their guilt or innocence
is determined. This man cannot be allowed to be a judge.
I believe this case is severe enought to warrant *any* action
to remove this man from power. Don't forget that majority will
of the people of Alabama was to hold *slaves* until we beat
them in a war, and to have black people live as second class
citizens until we had to send troops down there in the 60's.
If it comes to war again, so be it.
\_ In the 1700s there were more slaves in New York than
all of South. Only a few percent of Southerners, ie.
landed aristocrats, were slave holders.
For 2000 years homosexuality has been considered
unnatural - they can't reproduce! Don't you secular
humanists see the contradiction with evolution?
\_ I want more fags and less lesbos in the world.
That way there's less competition for the women.
\_ And i suppose that all the animals who demonstrate
homosexuality in the wild are just victims of an
evil liberal conspiracy by the Clintons?
\_ Being gay may be an evolutionary disadvantage, but having
some 'gay' behaviors may be an advantage, so the gene
lives on. Sort of like a heterozygus recessive, if
you'll pardon the pun.
\_ So then it would be morally wrong for a guy to just work
all the time and never date? I mean he can't
reproduce!
\_ The question is why some minority group deserves
special protection under the law simply because
of what the do in the bedroom. The irony is
this exact was predicted in a concurring opinion
in Griswald vs. Connecticut.
\_ This is a canard. No one (almost no one, okay)
wants special protection, just equal treatment.
\_ That is not what existing statutes
provide for. So now "equal treatment"
based on how you have sex is a natural
right? As dictated and
regulated by who? How do renconcile
this with freedom of association. Now
the government tells us how we have to
treat people because of what they do in
the bedroom.
\_ No, the government is telling us we
must treat all people equally
_regardless_ of what they do in the
bedroom. How this is not simply
common sense seriously boggles the mind.
\_ So if a congregation believes
homosexuality is a sin the
government has the power to force
it to accept a gay pastor in the
name of being 'fair'. The term 'fair'
when related to sexual choice
is so vague that its invites
gross abuse and the infringement
of freedom of association.
Now bestiality fetishes
and trangenders have the right
to force businesses them to hire
them because its 'fair'. Sorry,
you are a fascist. You should
not have the right to force
your bizarre agenda on other
people. If you want to do
it through 1) referendum
2) the legislature, fine.
However, as you know that will
never succeed.
\_ Bestiality involves non-
consensual sex. It is possible
(and preferable) to make rules
that allow for certain conduct
while continuing to outlaw
other conduct. The Santorum
argument ignores the ability
of people to make moral
distinctions outside of Biblical
proclamations. Stop trying to
throw the baby out with the
bath water.
\_ Never is a long time. People
thought slavery would last
forever, too.
\_ I think it's unnatural to drive a car. Thus, it's
immoral! And airplanes are even more immoral. Fire
too! Let's all go back into our caves.
\_ RIDE BIKE! LIGHT CANDLE! USE LINUX!
\_ Dead wrong. The Catholic Church widely condoned
homosexuality until about the 13th C, and even allowed
gay marriages. -- hetersexual catholic
\_ I think you mean clerical marriage.
John Boswell died of AIDS complications at
age 42 - think he could have had an agenda?
This is called historical revisionism, an art
perfected by the left.
http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/2002May/may23tru.htm
\_ That's right. And the banner that read
"Mission Accomplished" was mysteriously
hung on the aircraft carrier by leftist
insurgents.
\_ Yawn, redirection with a puerile
display of stupidity.
\_ Yet another classic case of right-wing
of civil disobedience, but if you are at all familiar with the
concept as practiced by Ghandi, King and Thoreau, you understand
issue dodging. No, seriously, you
don't believe the right engages in
historical revisionism?
\_ I agree. the left does historical revisionism
\_ To a Christian, all men are sinners, and all sins are
mortal. Adultery is sin too, for example. That doesn't
book, just a simple political power struggle, which he lost.
\_ nice.
mean they would advocate criminalizing adultery.
\_ Well, yes and no. Most sins can be forgiven if the sinner
repents or feels remorse and goes to confession. You can be
in a state of grace at least some of the time. Homosexuality
is unrepentant, ongoing sin. Isn't alabama one of the states
that has sodomy laws which are technically still enforced?
the US Circuit Court judges for ignoring the 1st and 10th
amendments.
\_ there are also venal sins. er, venial.
\_ Do you have a source that 10% of people are homosexual?
I don't believe this claim to be true, from personal
experience. -- ilyas
\_ Even if it's one percent or half a percent -- the man is a
JUDGE -- he's supposed to be passing judgement based on the
laws in the LAW books...not the religious ones. The exact
figure is kind of irrelevant.
\_ When has he ever stated that he ignores the law
in favor of the Bible. In the interviews I've
seen he states just the opposite.
\_ The 10% is based on the Kinsey study, which I personally
think overstated it, since they based it on lifetime
behavior not self-identification. But there are many
studies (use google) that indicate that the real percentage
of active GLBT in the general population is at least
4-5% -ausman
\_ I don't know. I lived in San Francisco, Berkeley, and
Los Angeles, not the most sexually repressed places
in the world. The figure of 4-5% still seems quite high.
-- ilyas
\_ My estimate is kind of on the conservative side,
actually. I am only including people who are
sexually active. Look at this study:
http://www.qrd.org/qrd/www/youth/tremblay/app-a.html
Do you think that 4-5% of SF is gay? You have got
to be kidding me. The real number is more like 15-20%.
\_ I don't think ilya gets out much.
\_ When I was in the co-ops, I'd guess 2% gay,
additional 2% Bi
\_ 2% bi? Heh, not among the girls. Sweet!
\_ Straights have notoriously bad gay-dar.
\_ A judge takes a vow to uphold the law. Moore believed himself to
be above the law and willfully violated it. So yes, I think
he should have been removed. I am well aware of the principle
of civil disobedience, but if you are familiar with the concept
as practiced by Ghandi, King and Thoreau, you understand
that you accept the punishment that comes from violating the law
as part of the deal. Additionally, they were not judges. I think
by holding himself above the law, he made a mockery of the
whole idea. He was not engaging in civil disobedience in my
book, just a simple political power struggle, which he lost.
\_ nice.
\_ he's preparing for a senate run, or governorship, duh
he's happy to be removed, do you think he's that dumb?
\_ If you support his removal then you must also support impeachment
the US Circuit Court judges for ignoring the 1st and 10th
amendments.
\_ If you think that boolean logic applies to the real world,
you must be a hopeless twink.
\_ If an appreciation of the historical context of the
amendments and their authors designates a twink,
I suppose so.
\_ Nice try, but your twinkness hinges on your inability
to see the shading between black and white, a disability
that will make you a great and courageous crusader, but
a poorly socialized member of society and a twink. |
| 2003/11/14-15 [Uncategorized] UID:11073 Activity:nil |
11/14 BLAM!! Take that you mean and humorless juvenile motd! BLAM!!!! |
| 2003/11/14-15 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:11074 Activity:insanely high |
11/14 Story time! Everyone add five words.
There once was a hoser
Who owned a bulldozer
And rode it to Cal every day
His major was EECS
His Classmates were freaks
And now he's decided he's gay.
He had posted to the motd
He could not go potty!
And now he is messy all over.
So then he did yermom.
or so he thought--but it was tom!
yermom looks like tom?
Then MOTD censor erased everything.
because of his small thing.
Who needs the Quick-E-mart?
To buy condoms, you say.
That does not make sense
"It does if you're making spunk parfait!
Fuck you, MOTD censor"
So said the Fuzzy Bunny.
Who forgot to add zinc
\_ Apparently a lot of you either don't know how to read instructions
or don't know how to count to five.
\_ IFILE. |
| 2003/11/14-15 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:11075 Activity:high |
11/14 Do I have to register as a Democrat to vote in the primary?
\_ I believe the 'open primary' law was struck down. Stil plenty of
time to register, though. Also, party registration is not needed
to vote on any ballot measures on the primary.
\_ Open Primary was squished by Supreme Court. If you want to
vote for a particular Dem candidate, you'll need to register
as a Dem.
\_ what was the reasoning for the squish?
\_ Private organizations (the parties) have the right to
control who can vote in the organization. Althouth I
liked the open primary, it sets bad legal precedant.
\_ I think private organizations should pay for the
poll and hold it themselves then. If the government
(public) is paying for it then everyone should be
able to vote in it. --dim
\_ Well, they can vote in the other primary. Why do
people want to help choose a different party's
candidate? You don't support that party anyway.
Would the repubs vote for someone they like, or
someone they think would be a bad candidate?
\_ Personally, I voted for the guy I liked most. If
this is a Party thing then the Party should
conduct its own selection process and let us
all know who they chose instead of putting it
on a general ballot.
\_ If my heart is with the Republicans, can I register as
a Democrat and then vote for the lamest one among the
Democratic candidates in their primary? And vice versa?
\_ No, you may not. As a Republican, you're bound by
the supposedly higher morality that your kind
constantly bray about to vote your conscience, not
for political gain. Anything else would be
hypocritical. The rest of us godless heathens,
OTOH, are free to make sure that bozos like Bill
Simon represent you in close elections.
\_ nice.
\_ no, you have to register as a hypocrite first. |
| 2003/11/14-15 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:11076 Activity:very high |
11/14 ausman, stop overwriting other people's posts, you bastard.
\_ motdedit is not an excuse for just overwriting what people
have written. grow up and take some responsibility.
\_ Why do programmers use CVS? If you are a CS person and you
do not understand the need for version control, they I pity you.
\_ What about re-writing motdedit to patch/merge the new file with
an updated motd.public? It would reduce lock-contention and
would make the pseudonymous posters (who don't use the locks)
happier.
\_ Write your post in a separate editor. Use motdedit. Paste your
your post in. Save. Haven't gotten a warning to overwrite
someone else's changes in a long time.
\_ Or not. Motdedit isn't a requirement. It's an option some
choose not to use. Look, we've been down this path before and
you can't force people to use motdedit. Using motdedit doesn't
provide the moral authority to overwrite other people's comments
either. I neither use motdedit not do I overwrite other's
comments. It is possible to do. But when I see some arrogant
self righteous motdedit using asshole overwrite stuff I feel
no guilt smashing over their shit immediately no matter whose
comments they rudely destroyed.
\_ Whoever you are, you just overwrote _two_ other people's
comments, at least one of whom(me), who doesn't overwrite
other comments.
\_ Acutally, that probably me. I had an ohno-second. Sorry.
\_ the overwrite happened at the same time(2:48:40) as
the above post. Both overwrites now restored.
\_ If you cannot see the impossibility of resolving
simultaneous conflicting edits, you are a moron and
I am annoyed that you matriculated from Berkeley.
\_ out of curiosity, shouldn't it be possible to make the motd file
such that it can ONLY be modified by people using an access script,
forcing the serialization of edits?
\_ yes, with root level support and the like, but then you lose
pseudonymity, which people seem to like. If we improve motdedit
to use patch/merge, then we reduce the window of opportunity for
overwrites.
\_ I'll think about it. I still think you should stop jumping the
queue and expecting others to merge your changes. -ausman
\_ I use JOVE. It tells me when changes have been made to the
doc since I started working on it. I then copy whatever I've
just written, exit without saving, open the motd again and
paste. If everyone did something similar, we wouldn't have
this problem.
\_ I use MOTDEDIT. It tells me when someone else is editing the
motd. I then wait for that person to stop finish, then write
my post. If everyone did something similar, we wouldn't have
this problem. |
| 2003/11/14-15 [Politics/Domestic/Election, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:11077 Activity:moderate |
11/14 Posted on slashdot yesterday, Gore Vidal interview.
http://www.laweekly.com/ink/03/52/features-cooper.php
\_ [Franklin:] I am in favor of this Constitution, as flawed as it is,
because we need good government and we need it fast. But then,
Franklin said, it will fail, as all such constitutions have in
the past, because of the essential corruption of the people. He
pointed his finger at all the American people. And when the people
become so corrupt, he said, we will find it is not a republic that
they want but rather despotism government suitable for such a
people.
\_ In other words, we get the government we deserve. |
| 2003/11/14-15 [Consumer/CellPhone] UID:11078 Activity:very high |
11/14 What's a good site for getting FREE (I say FREE) cell phone ring tones.
It could even be the kind you have to enter the notes by hand. Gracias.
\_ FOAD
\_ I'll second that. -mice
\_ for the love of god, don't use custom ring tones, okay?
\_ HEY MACARENA!
\_ If I owned a gun, you'd be dead.
\_ this little one's not worth the effort.
now, come, let me get you something...
\_ I have ten.
\_ All it takes is one.
\_ What, one for each finger? Go, Johnny Socko!
\_ Please die. Cell phones are annoying enough. Now we're going to
have another 100 million cell phone using idiots using the cell
as their only phone soon and each moron thinking they're special
unique with their obnoxious and tweaky ringtone set so loud it
wakes up the dead two BART cars over. Put it to rest.
\_ there are technical solutions to deal with assholes who use
cell phones, but then you become an asshole as well.
\_ Wow, I never know what's going to set you socially-retarded geeks off.
You know, I know how to set the ring volume to low. - o.p.
\_ *clap* Nice troll op. Nice follow up troll too.
\_ *we're* the social retards? you're the one who wants to annoy
everyone around you with a ring-tone.
\_ Here's the California Fight Song! Not free though.
http://csua.org/u/50e |
| 2003/11/14-15 [Uncategorized] UID:11079 Activity:very high |
11/14 why did They travel millions of miles just to stick metal things up
our asses?
\_ Huh?
\_ Because they can.
\_ All the asses on their home planet already have metal things in them
\_ Exactly. It's a limited resource issue.
\_ wrong, too much metal on their planet, have to put it
somewhere
\_ if they were all R2-D2's, that's the only access ports their
dimunitive bodies could reach. |
| 2003/11/14-16 [Uncategorized] UID:11083 Activity:nil |
11/14 job opp:
http://list.nten.org/lists/arc/501techclub-sf/2003-11/msg00000.html |
| 2003/11/14-16 [Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:11084 Activity:nil |
11/14 macboy here. I updated Office to 10.1.2, then had to update Entourage
(?) to 10.1.4, then updated to 10.1.5. No crashes so far. BTW, this
isn't my computer, I run Win2k, I'm helping out a friend who loves Macs
but is more clueless than me.
\_ try reversing the polarity.
\_ if you vector the tachyon particles through the deflector grid array
then surely the muon flux capacitor will align with the anti matter
wave field. Or maybe the entire universe will disappear. I'm not
sure. Give it a try.
\_ and if that doesn't work, read the man page, look at the source
code, and recompile the kernel. |
| 2003/11/14-15 [Uncategorized] UID:11085 Activity:nil |
11/14 In Fortran, runtime can be found by t1=TIME(), t2=TIME(),
runtime=t2-t1. What's the equivalent to TIME() in C?
\_ man gettimeofday (time in seconds + useconds since 1970)
\_ Or, if you're lazy and just want seconds, you can use C's
own time() function: time_t t1 = time(NULL); |
| 2003/11/14 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:29634 Activity:nil |
11/13 CNN: "An AC-130 Spectre gunship was called in to destroy a warehouse
in southern Baghdad used by Iraqi insurgents to meet and plan attacks
against U.S. forces around the Iraqi capital, the officials said.
There were no known casualties in the incident."
Great, so we shoot up an empty building (so we won't accidentally kill
civilians) with a plane with a big cannon, and this is the war on
the insurgency?
\_ Hey! It helps to build morale.
\_ According to _Jarhead_ by Swocroft, this is true. Blowing
things up will most certainly raise GI morale.
\_ that's Swofford. and I wouldn't exactly describe his state
at the end of the book as one of "high morale" after
blowing shit up.
\_ They destroyed an abandoned building instead of wasting troops
sitting there to patrol and guard it. What's your beef?
\_ my troll is bigger than yours!
\_ uh? yermom!
\_ That's great. But why stop at "abandoned" buildings? Just
get rid of Baghdad altogether, and go home. |
| 2003/11/14 [Uncategorized] UID:29635 Activity:nil |
11/13 I heard somewhere that Kuninich supports an anti flag-burning
constitutional amendmant. Is this true? It seems out of character.
\_ You're thinking of Clark:
link:www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/politics/7237425.htm
\_ I know about Clark. But et tu, Kuninich? -op
\_ Check the bottom of the article.
\_ What about burning hair pieces?
\_ Banned. Too smelly.
\_ Does it matter? He's not getting more than 5% anyway. |
| 2003/11/14 [Uncategorized] UID:29636 Activity:nil |
11/14 Story time! Everyone add five words.
There once was a hoser
Who owned a bulldozer |
| 3/15 |