| ||||||
| 2003/9/18 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:10238 Activity:nil |
9/17 Anyone uses Mozilla Firebird? I already have jvm installed, but
my browser doesn't detect java plugins. How to install java plugin
manually on firebird?
\_ Firebird can't do Java
\_ I'm using FireBird 0.6.1 with JRE 1.4.2, Win2k and WinXP
without problems (assuming you're on Windows)..
Check http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/faqs/phoenixwin.html for
hints and tips. Most likely, you need to to apply a registry
patch so Plugins know where to find Mozilla.
The generic Plugin FAQ is located at
http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/faqs Note: I also have Netscape
7.1 installed, so FireBird may be getting the JavaPlugin info
from my Netscape Plugin folder. |
| 2003/9/18 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Domestic/Crime] UID:10239 Activity:moderate |
9/17 Wesley Clark: General Issues
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=9522
Wesley Clark's command at Fort Hood lent 17 pieces of armor and
15 active service personnel under his command to the Waco Branch
Davidian operation.
\_ food for thought- he's the Chairman of a electric car company.
maybe the voters can help the environment by bringing in corporate
influence from the opposite direction!
http://www.wavecrestlabs.com/news/pr042103.html
\_ He is a soldier. Soldier doesn't make decisions. They execute
orders.
\_ I imagine alot of German's said this during WWII.
\_ It's not a war crime to lend out personnel for a mission.
\_ And the Imperial Japanese.
\_ And the Americans in Vietnam.
\_ Vietnam is hardly comparable to Germany/Japan in
WWII.
\_ In scale, no, in principle, yes.
\_ Sorry, I normally don't reply to motd
posts with insults, but this statement
marks you as an idiot beyond the pale
of the ordinary ignoramus. -John
\_ We are talking about the principle
\_ We are not talking about the nature
of the wars, but the principle
that soldiers should not always
blindly follow orders. "It's my
orders" had been used as part of
legal defense for trials of Vietnam
atrocities. Don't get too excited.
\_ Wasn't excited, was calling you
an idiot. My apologies, you've
clarified yourself, I take it back.
\_ Officers are expected to make decisions.
\_ People accusing how China dealing with FaLunGong... The way
USA dealing with cult within its territory is not all that
different neither.
\_ Uhm no. The situation was largely unacceptable and there was
a LOT of criticism and debate that resulted from that fiasco.
Do you really think a situation like this would hit the chinese
press as anything but glorious victory of chinese nationalist
forces over subversive insurgent criminals???
\_ Perhaps the better analogy for PRC-Falungong is US-Muslims.
\_ Perhaps not. Where are Muslims being rounded up and put
in prison or insame asylums? Take it home, Jack. We know
about China.
\_ Perhaps the better analogy would be US-Mormons in the
past.
\_ Many muslims were rounded up and detained for weeks or
months post 9/11.
\_ Do FaLunGong members stock up firearms?
\_ no, firearms are hard to come by. They did disrupt
TV signals, etc. I guess anything they do is legit
because they are against a "communist" government, right?
\_ Gasp! Stocking up firearms! They must DIE DIE DIE.
\_ Since when is this illegal? Koresh jogged daily
through Waco. |
| 2003/9/18 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:10240 Activity:high |
9/17 Should the 30 million dollar reward for Saddam be offered and
eligible to the soldier who bags Saddam?
\_ The 30 mil is for information leading us to him. If the soldiers
have found him, we don't need the info.
\_ yeah but if we get him without info, that would be more incentive
for a soldier to capture him or kill him.
\_ I bet the soldiers have plenty of incentive already.
\_ our soliders aren't bounty hunters. they don't need extra
incentive to follow orders. if they do we're really fucked.
\_ Has Saddam Hussein put a reward on Bush's head yet?
\- isnt this like offereing your company headhunter a referral
bonus? i thinkt eh real question is do you shoot him down like
a dog, or take him alive. --psb
dog, or take him alive. --psb
\_ I bet this was moved to a different point on the thread.
dog, or take him alive. --psb
Yay idiot humor.
\_ Saddam's in my basement. How do I get my $30 mil? -John |
| 2003/9/18 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:10241 Activity:nil |
9/17 http://www.moveon.org/firerumsfeld \_ I've got a long list of what you might call 'neocon' websites but I don't waste motd bits posting obvious right wing drivel. Do us a favor and don't post left wing drivel? \_ Left wing? The man is a fuckup. It's not a party issue. |
| 2003/9/18 [Computer/Companies/Yahoo] UID:10242 Activity:low |
9/18 Top floor, Scotty! http://csua.org/u/4da \_ Anyone who wants a space elevator should read Kim Stanley Robinson's "Red Mars". And that's a small one. \_ Why? Because he described the fictionalized effects of a space elevator in a rapidly decaying orbit above Mars? I think you're reaching here. |
| 2003/9/18 [Finance/Investment] UID:10243 Activity:high |
9/18 I'm a stock holder and I get the following question on the proxy
vote: "PROPOSAL FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL
YEAR 2004 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN. Directors Recommend: FOR"
Except for the greedy ass execs, why would any stock holder in
their right mind vote for "FOR"?
\_ Everyone washing everyone else's back. Your vote doesn't matter
anyway.
\_ maybe you *haven't read* the thing and it's actually
decreasing their bonuses or something. and if not, the
answer is, invariably, some people are stupid! duh.
\_ The presumption is that by giving these bonuses the execs will
be better motivated to increase the value of your stock. Whether
or not it works is another question.
\_ The big shareholders (corporate or institutional) fear change
in leadership even more than slightly below average leadership. By
approving bonuses, they keep the current execs and avoid possible
randomness in stock price, speculation, lack of direction, etc.
\_ don't worry, the NASDAQ board is going to give themselves a
bonus for ousting Grasso
\_ what is FOR? |
| 2003/9/18 [Health/Women] UID:10244 Activity:high |
9/18 Somebody settle an argument between my wife and I. She says that
a woman's ovaries contain *ALL* the eggs that she'll ever have. The
menstrual cycle simply releases one egg every month. I remember in
high school bio that ovaries work like testicles. Sperm cells die
or are ejaculated and new ones are produced every day. Who is right?
Are eggs produced once a month just like sperm cells are produced
every day or are they simply released every month? This came up
because women in their 20s produce healthier babies than women in
their 30s. [yes, I've searched the web and can't find anything
that specific]. Thanks.
\_ She is correct. The ovaries release one egg per month.
\_ I pity your wife. How did she get stuck with such a moron?
\_ Pity.
\_ heh, well some women like their men dumb. btw, not only do
women not produce more eggs, they have a fairly limited
supply, like several hundred. good for normal use, but not for
lots of egg donation.
\_ Nyet! They've got gazillions. Some women like their men both
dumb *and* arrogant.
\_ MYSTERY SOLVED BRO:
During fetal life, there are about 6 million to
7 million eggs. From this time, no new eggs are produced.
The vast majority of the eggs within the ovaries
steadily die, until they are depleted at menopause.
At birth, there are approximately 1 million eggs; and by
the time of puberty, only about 300,000 remain. Of these,
300 to 400 will be ovulated during a woman's reproductive
lifetime. The eggs continue to degenerate during pregnancy,
with the use of birth control pills, and in the presence
or absence of regular menstrual cycles. -maxmcc
\_ How do birth control pills cause eggs to degenerate
more than not?
\_ The sentence structures out to "no matter what, the eggs
degenerate."
\_ That's right. When a woman is born, she's got all the eggs
she's ever gonna have.
\_ you learned this in CS classes? - a dumb man |
| 2003/9/18-19 [Computer/HW, Computer/SW] UID:10245 Activity:high |
9/18 How does one prevent the motd from being truncated? For example,
cp /etc/motd.public ~/foo; mv ~/foo /etc/motd.public
results in a permission denied error, even though the file is
world-writable.
\_ what are you trying to do?
\_ rewrite /csua/bin/me to use diff and patch... minimize the
amount of time holding an exclusive lock.
\_ Hell, just use cvs...
\_ Yeah, but don't you need a server for this?
\_ you can't do that with mv, use cp and then delete foo |
| 2003/9/18-19 [Uncategorized] UID:10246 Activity:nil |
9/18 Could anyone recommend a good and cheap ISP in Washington DC. |
| 2003/9/18-19 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:10247 Activity:high |
9/18 Hans Blix gets in his parting shot:
http://csua.org/u/4dl
Too bad America didn't listen to him, instead of that boob in the
White House.
\_ Yeah, there'd still be hundreds of people getting summarily
executed, tortured, and disappeared off the Iraqi streets
everyday by Hussein's thugs if we had listened to Blix. Your
moral strength is overwhelming.
\_ How do you feel about the US propping up tyrants all over
the world? If you really believe in the Jimmy Carter school
of foreign policy, I respect you, even if I think you are
a bit naive. But I suspect you are just a Bush apologist
who has suddenly found civil rights as a causis belli.
\_ Well said. --scotsman
\_ U.S. can't depose every cruel dictator on earth, but the
only guy worse than Hussein is someone who can reach
S.F. and/or destroy Seoul with nukes. Granted, that
Hussein was bad to his own wasn't the reason U.S. went
after him, but why are so many people wringing their hands
about what a mistake it was to get rid of him? Why are so
many people hoping Iraq descends into anarchy so that U.S.
can be "taught a lesson"? Why do so many people want U.S.
out so that this can happen, paving the way for Iraq to
become the next Yugoslavia or Sudan? And how can these
same people claim to be on the side of "civil rights"? I
personally would be wrong than have millions suffer. Why
is this not so with so many of the self-anointed "civil
rights" activists?
\_ It wasn't a mistake to remove Hussein. The error was the
method. Anarchy already exists in Iraq, and since the US
is unwilling to relent or give up power, few are interested
helping promote a failing policy. And the term you are
misusing should be human rights. Plus the US isn't allowing
others into Iraq unless they bend their knee to Washington.
\_ The reason many liberals opposed the war was not because we think
the U.S. should ignore brutal tyrants, but because the war was
sold to the public based on half-truths and lies. Also invading
another country without U.N. approval and pissing off other
countries...
\_ So you would have supported it if they said it was to free
the Iraqi people? I think not. What does the UN have to do
with it? Since when did the UN become the ruling world body?
I don't recall voting to allow a bunch of third world
actually Fox News, lies. Almost all (all?) of them have
unelected dictators, tyrants, and enemies of the US decide
what my country is "allowed" to do.
\_ If they'd said it was to free Iraq, I'd've suggested
that they consider freeing Burma, Angola, and Syria
first. I'd've also suggested that they lean more
heavily on Saudi Arabia and Egypt before they start
invading Iraq. And finally, I would have suggested
that they demonstrate that they can actually "free"
a country from oppression and install democracy by
first finishing up the process in Afghanistan. Show
me you can do this, and I'll march in your army.
\_ So I'm assuming you can prove it. Ooops. Proof left to reader
since it's obvious to BushCo!
\_ I've seen the Eiffel tower. I've stood at the observation
platform and looked out over Paris. I can not prove I have
done so, nor can I prove the Eiffel tower exists. However,
to say that the Eiffel tower does not exist because I can not
prove it to your level of comfort does *not* make the Eiffel
tower *not* exist. You're probably right. All those mass
graves reports are just BushCo lies.
\_ Most of those "mass graves" reports really are BushCo
or Fox News, lies. Almost all (all?) of them have
turned out to be regular graveyards. You know, like the
kind every country has, even the US. The US killed 10k
civilians in this war at least. How long would it take
Saddam Hussein to kill this many?
\_ Saddom would look fairly moderate on the large list of tyranical
regimes that the US has not only tolerated but also supported
in the past.
\_ And the racism of today would look downright tame
compared to that of the past. Is that your only
way of evaluating right and wrong - precident? The
sins of Ike should be upon Bush?
\_ "I find your lack of faith disturbing.." |
| 2003/9/18-19 [Computer/SW/Languages/Java, Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:10248 Activity:low |
9/18 I have an embedded C++ application that passes around a lot of
68-byte structs-- the struct is a wrapper around a binary message,
and just about every function call includes one of them (usually
passed by copy). Today I changed the struct into a class which
contains an empty Constructor/Destructor, and Configure() method
which initializes every field. Basically nothing else was changed:
the 68-byte struct became a 72-byte object. No inheritance, no
virtual functions, everything is allocated on the stack. My test
suite is taking 300% longer to run, even with -O3. Any ideas
about what might be causing this? I'm going to look into gprof,
but if there are any hints and tips I'd like to hear them. Thanks.
\_ WAG: From your description, I gather you changed the definition
from: struct Foo { ... }; to: class Foo { ... };
Try changing "class" back to "struct" and see if that changes
anything.
\_ It does-- it cuts the running time by 2/3. I've got 2
parallel (except for the class stuff) directories and I'm
running the tests side by side.
\_ Well, are you passing these structs by value? Are you
constructing and deconstructing tons and tons of classes
now? Calling all those empty constructors and deconstructors
can get quite expensive. Also do you have RTTI turned on?
That could explain the extra bytes,
\_ I don't have RTTI on explicitly (how would I check?),
and I'm not using any template stuff. The compiler is
gcc 3.2. Is there a way to optimize the (de|con)structor
calls to nothing? I had figured that -O2 would take
care of that for me. Also, I think that extra 4 bytes
is just a pointer to the dispatch table, which is
completely expected. --op
\_ If you have no virtual functions you don't have a
dispatch table, and you shouldn't have a pointer.
Trust me when your basic math objects are classes
and you have umpty millions of them, doubling the
size for a dispatch pointer would be really annoying.
\_ Aaah! You're totally right. Out of habit I had
put "virtual ~Foo() { };". I removed the virtual
and the code is now about 5-10% *faster* than the
struct version. Thank you thank you thank you.
\_ Two more suggestions: Did you define Configure() in the
header file? If so, move it to the implementation file
and see if that makes a difference. Also, try compiling
with -Os, which optimizes for size (at least on my
gcc). - struct guy
\_ Configure is defined in the .cc file; I'll give -Os
a shot now.
\_ Try swapping the the definition of the ctor/dtor
and Configure from .cc to .h or vice-versa.
\_ Why did you change working code in the first place? That's where
your real problem is.
\_ Obviously so he could put C/C++ on his resume! |
| 2003/9/18-19 [Recreation/Shopping] UID:10249 Activity:high |
9/18 I need to buy some decent running shoes, but I don't know jack
about them. Any advice for a big guy looking to seriously take up
jogging/running? TIA. -mice
\_ Sign your name. Run on dirt, not sidewalks.
\_ On The Run, 9th St / Irving in SF
\_ Go to La Foot on College (near Ashby). They will watch you walk
and suggest good shoes for you. Expect to pay between $80
and $130 or so.
\_ What about $40 Saucony's?
\_ Athletic Performance (55 W. Main St., Los Gatos). Everyone has
different requirements & feet (eg, do you over-pronate?). They'll
help you find the right shoe.
\_ a rec based on personal experience -- asics. If they fit your
particular foot shape, they're good shoes. --jon
\_ can you trust what they tell you at these specialty stores or are
they just there to convince you to buy more expensive shoes?
\- at minimum they should look at the bottom of your shoes
and watch you walk. you can tell a lot based on the wear
pattern. also they will at least measure your footwidth.
some companies make many widths [like NewBalance] ... so if
you have unusual foot dimensions, NB is a good company to go
with. Nike has some good shoes but they fall apart easily ...
then again that is why I havent bought any Nikes in yrs. --psb
\_ With good shoe salespeople, not at all. I was actually
recommended a cheaper shoe than the one I was looking at. The
key is, they want repeat business from you, because shoes are
really only good for 500 miles or 8-12 months (that's assuming
regular running). Chains like Foot Locker don't give a flying
fuck... they just want all your money now (not to mention they
dunno anything about shoes beyond what's in the pamplets). |
| 5/16 |