|
2003/9/18 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:10238 Activity:nil |
9/17 Anyone uses Mozilla Firebird? I already have jvm installed, but my browser doesn't detect java plugins. How to install java plugin manually on firebird? \_ Firebird can't do Java \_ I'm using FireBird 0.6.1 with JRE 1.4.2, Win2k and WinXP without problems (assuming you're on Windows).. Check http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/faqs/phoenixwin.html for hints and tips. Most likely, you need to to apply a registry patch so Plugins know where to find Mozilla. The generic Plugin FAQ is located at http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/faqs Note: I also have Netscape 7.1 installed, so FireBird may be getting the JavaPlugin info from my Netscape Plugin folder. |
2003/9/18 [Politics/Domestic/President/Clinton, Politics/Domestic/Crime] UID:10239 Activity:moderate |
9/17 Wesley Clark: General Issues http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=9522 Wesley Clark's command at Fort Hood lent 17 pieces of armor and 15 active service personnel under his command to the Waco Branch Davidian operation. \_ food for thought- he's the Chairman of a electric car company. maybe the voters can help the environment by bringing in corporate influence from the opposite direction! http://www.wavecrestlabs.com/news/pr042103.html \_ He is a soldier. Soldier doesn't make decisions. They execute orders. \_ I imagine alot of German's said this during WWII. \_ It's not a war crime to lend out personnel for a mission. \_ And the Imperial Japanese. \_ And the Americans in Vietnam. \_ Vietnam is hardly comparable to Germany/Japan in WWII. \_ In scale, no, in principle, yes. \_ Sorry, I normally don't reply to motd posts with insults, but this statement marks you as an idiot beyond the pale of the ordinary ignoramus. -John \_ We are talking about the principle \_ We are not talking about the nature of the wars, but the principle that soldiers should not always blindly follow orders. "It's my orders" had been used as part of legal defense for trials of Vietnam atrocities. Don't get too excited. \_ Wasn't excited, was calling you an idiot. My apologies, you've clarified yourself, I take it back. \_ Officers are expected to make decisions. \_ People accusing how China dealing with FaLunGong... The way USA dealing with cult within its territory is not all that different neither. \_ Uhm no. The situation was largely unacceptable and there was a LOT of criticism and debate that resulted from that fiasco. Do you really think a situation like this would hit the chinese press as anything but glorious victory of chinese nationalist forces over subversive insurgent criminals??? \_ Perhaps the better analogy for PRC-Falungong is US-Muslims. \_ Perhaps not. Where are Muslims being rounded up and put in prison or insame asylums? Take it home, Jack. We know about China. \_ Perhaps the better analogy would be US-Mormons in the past. \_ Many muslims were rounded up and detained for weeks or months post 9/11. \_ Do FaLunGong members stock up firearms? \_ no, firearms are hard to come by. They did disrupt TV signals, etc. I guess anything they do is legit because they are against a "communist" government, right? \_ Gasp! Stocking up firearms! They must DIE DIE DIE. \_ Since when is this illegal? Koresh jogged daily through Waco. |
2003/9/18 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:10240 Activity:high |
9/17 Should the 30 million dollar reward for Saddam be offered and eligible to the soldier who bags Saddam? \_ The 30 mil is for information leading us to him. If the soldiers have found him, we don't need the info. \_ yeah but if we get him without info, that would be more incentive for a soldier to capture him or kill him. \_ I bet the soldiers have plenty of incentive already. \_ our soliders aren't bounty hunters. they don't need extra incentive to follow orders. if they do we're really fucked. \_ Has Saddam Hussein put a reward on Bush's head yet? \- isnt this like offereing your company headhunter a referral bonus? i thinkt eh real question is do you shoot him down like a dog, or take him alive. --psb dog, or take him alive. --psb \_ I bet this was moved to a different point on the thread. dog, or take him alive. --psb Yay idiot humor. \_ Saddam's in my basement. How do I get my $30 mil? -John |
2003/9/18 [Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:10241 Activity:nil |
9/17 http://www.moveon.org/firerumsfeld \_ I've got a long list of what you might call 'neocon' websites but I don't waste motd bits posting obvious right wing drivel. Do us a favor and don't post left wing drivel? \_ Left wing? The man is a fuckup. It's not a party issue. |
2003/9/18 [Computer/Companies/Yahoo] UID:10242 Activity:low |
9/18 Top floor, Scotty! http://csua.org/u/4da \_ Anyone who wants a space elevator should read Kim Stanley Robinson's "Red Mars". And that's a small one. \_ Why? Because he described the fictionalized effects of a space elevator in a rapidly decaying orbit above Mars? I think you're reaching here. |
2003/9/18 [Finance/Investment] UID:10243 Activity:high |
9/18 I'm a stock holder and I get the following question on the proxy vote: "PROPOSAL FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE ADOPTION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2004 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN. Directors Recommend: FOR" Except for the greedy ass execs, why would any stock holder in their right mind vote for "FOR"? \_ Everyone washing everyone else's back. Your vote doesn't matter anyway. \_ maybe you *haven't read* the thing and it's actually decreasing their bonuses or something. and if not, the answer is, invariably, some people are stupid! duh. \_ The presumption is that by giving these bonuses the execs will be better motivated to increase the value of your stock. Whether or not it works is another question. \_ The big shareholders (corporate or institutional) fear change in leadership even more than slightly below average leadership. By approving bonuses, they keep the current execs and avoid possible randomness in stock price, speculation, lack of direction, etc. \_ don't worry, the NASDAQ board is going to give themselves a bonus for ousting Grasso \_ what is FOR? |
2003/9/18 [Health/Women] UID:10244 Activity:high |
9/18 Somebody settle an argument between my wife and I. She says that a woman's ovaries contain *ALL* the eggs that she'll ever have. The menstrual cycle simply releases one egg every month. I remember in high school bio that ovaries work like testicles. Sperm cells die or are ejaculated and new ones are produced every day. Who is right? Are eggs produced once a month just like sperm cells are produced every day or are they simply released every month? This came up because women in their 20s produce healthier babies than women in their 30s. [yes, I've searched the web and can't find anything that specific]. Thanks. \_ She is correct. The ovaries release one egg per month. \_ I pity your wife. How did she get stuck with such a moron? \_ Pity. \_ heh, well some women like their men dumb. btw, not only do women not produce more eggs, they have a fairly limited supply, like several hundred. good for normal use, but not for lots of egg donation. \_ Nyet! They've got gazillions. Some women like their men both dumb *and* arrogant. \_ MYSTERY SOLVED BRO: During fetal life, there are about 6 million to 7 million eggs. From this time, no new eggs are produced. The vast majority of the eggs within the ovaries steadily die, until they are depleted at menopause. At birth, there are approximately 1 million eggs; and by the time of puberty, only about 300,000 remain. Of these, 300 to 400 will be ovulated during a woman's reproductive lifetime. The eggs continue to degenerate during pregnancy, with the use of birth control pills, and in the presence or absence of regular menstrual cycles. -maxmcc \_ How do birth control pills cause eggs to degenerate more than not? \_ The sentence structures out to "no matter what, the eggs degenerate." \_ That's right. When a woman is born, she's got all the eggs she's ever gonna have. \_ you learned this in CS classes? - a dumb man |
2003/9/18-19 [Computer/HW, Computer/SW] UID:10245 Activity:high |
9/18 How does one prevent the motd from being truncated? For example, cp /etc/motd.public ~/foo; mv ~/foo /etc/motd.public results in a permission denied error, even though the file is world-writable. \_ what are you trying to do? \_ rewrite /csua/bin/me to use diff and patch... minimize the amount of time holding an exclusive lock. \_ Hell, just use cvs... \_ Yeah, but don't you need a server for this? \_ you can't do that with mv, use cp and then delete foo |
2003/9/18-19 [Uncategorized] UID:10246 Activity:nil |
9/18 Could anyone recommend a good and cheap ISP in Washington DC. |
2003/9/18-19 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:10247 Activity:high |
9/18 Hans Blix gets in his parting shot: http://csua.org/u/4dl Too bad America didn't listen to him, instead of that boob in the White House. \_ Yeah, there'd still be hundreds of people getting summarily executed, tortured, and disappeared off the Iraqi streets everyday by Hussein's thugs if we had listened to Blix. Your moral strength is overwhelming. \_ How do you feel about the US propping up tyrants all over the world? If you really believe in the Jimmy Carter school of foreign policy, I respect you, even if I think you are a bit naive. But I suspect you are just a Bush apologist who has suddenly found civil rights as a causis belli. \_ Well said. --scotsman \_ U.S. can't depose every cruel dictator on earth, but the only guy worse than Hussein is someone who can reach S.F. and/or destroy Seoul with nukes. Granted, that Hussein was bad to his own wasn't the reason U.S. went after him, but why are so many people wringing their hands about what a mistake it was to get rid of him? Why are so many people hoping Iraq descends into anarchy so that U.S. can be "taught a lesson"? Why do so many people want U.S. out so that this can happen, paving the way for Iraq to become the next Yugoslavia or Sudan? And how can these same people claim to be on the side of "civil rights"? I personally would be wrong than have millions suffer. Why is this not so with so many of the self-anointed "civil rights" activists? \_ It wasn't a mistake to remove Hussein. The error was the method. Anarchy already exists in Iraq, and since the US is unwilling to relent or give up power, few are interested helping promote a failing policy. And the term you are misusing should be human rights. Plus the US isn't allowing others into Iraq unless they bend their knee to Washington. \_ The reason many liberals opposed the war was not because we think the U.S. should ignore brutal tyrants, but because the war was sold to the public based on half-truths and lies. Also invading another country without U.N. approval and pissing off other countries... \_ So you would have supported it if they said it was to free the Iraqi people? I think not. What does the UN have to do with it? Since when did the UN become the ruling world body? I don't recall voting to allow a bunch of third world actually Fox News, lies. Almost all (all?) of them have unelected dictators, tyrants, and enemies of the US decide what my country is "allowed" to do. \_ If they'd said it was to free Iraq, I'd've suggested that they consider freeing Burma, Angola, and Syria first. I'd've also suggested that they lean more heavily on Saudi Arabia and Egypt before they start invading Iraq. And finally, I would have suggested that they demonstrate that they can actually "free" a country from oppression and install democracy by first finishing up the process in Afghanistan. Show me you can do this, and I'll march in your army. \_ So I'm assuming you can prove it. Ooops. Proof left to reader since it's obvious to BushCo! \_ I've seen the Eiffel tower. I've stood at the observation platform and looked out over Paris. I can not prove I have done so, nor can I prove the Eiffel tower exists. However, to say that the Eiffel tower does not exist because I can not prove it to your level of comfort does *not* make the Eiffel tower *not* exist. You're probably right. All those mass graves reports are just BushCo lies. \_ Most of those "mass graves" reports really are BushCo or Fox News, lies. Almost all (all?) of them have turned out to be regular graveyards. You know, like the kind every country has, even the US. The US killed 10k civilians in this war at least. How long would it take Saddam Hussein to kill this many? \_ Saddom would look fairly moderate on the large list of tyranical regimes that the US has not only tolerated but also supported in the past. \_ And the racism of today would look downright tame compared to that of the past. Is that your only way of evaluating right and wrong - precident? The sins of Ike should be upon Bush? \_ "I find your lack of faith disturbing.." |
2003/9/18-19 [Computer/SW/Languages/Java, Computer/SW/Languages/C_Cplusplus] UID:10248 Activity:low |
9/18 I have an embedded C++ application that passes around a lot of 68-byte structs-- the struct is a wrapper around a binary message, and just about every function call includes one of them (usually passed by copy). Today I changed the struct into a class which contains an empty Constructor/Destructor, and Configure() method which initializes every field. Basically nothing else was changed: the 68-byte struct became a 72-byte object. No inheritance, no virtual functions, everything is allocated on the stack. My test suite is taking 300% longer to run, even with -O3. Any ideas about what might be causing this? I'm going to look into gprof, but if there are any hints and tips I'd like to hear them. Thanks. \_ WAG: From your description, I gather you changed the definition from: struct Foo { ... }; to: class Foo { ... }; Try changing "class" back to "struct" and see if that changes anything. \_ It does-- it cuts the running time by 2/3. I've got 2 parallel (except for the class stuff) directories and I'm running the tests side by side. \_ Well, are you passing these structs by value? Are you constructing and deconstructing tons and tons of classes now? Calling all those empty constructors and deconstructors can get quite expensive. Also do you have RTTI turned on? That could explain the extra bytes, \_ I don't have RTTI on explicitly (how would I check?), and I'm not using any template stuff. The compiler is gcc 3.2. Is there a way to optimize the (de|con)structor calls to nothing? I had figured that -O2 would take care of that for me. Also, I think that extra 4 bytes is just a pointer to the dispatch table, which is completely expected. --op \_ If you have no virtual functions you don't have a dispatch table, and you shouldn't have a pointer. Trust me when your basic math objects are classes and you have umpty millions of them, doubling the size for a dispatch pointer would be really annoying. \_ Aaah! You're totally right. Out of habit I had put "virtual ~Foo() { };". I removed the virtual and the code is now about 5-10% *faster* than the struct version. Thank you thank you thank you. \_ Two more suggestions: Did you define Configure() in the header file? If so, move it to the implementation file and see if that makes a difference. Also, try compiling with -Os, which optimizes for size (at least on my gcc). - struct guy \_ Configure is defined in the .cc file; I'll give -Os a shot now. \_ Try swapping the the definition of the ctor/dtor and Configure from .cc to .h or vice-versa. \_ Why did you change working code in the first place? That's where your real problem is. \_ Obviously so he could put C/C++ on his resume! |
2003/9/18-19 [Recreation/Shopping] UID:10249 Activity:high |
9/18 I need to buy some decent running shoes, but I don't know jack about them. Any advice for a big guy looking to seriously take up jogging/running? TIA. -mice \_ Sign your name. Run on dirt, not sidewalks. \_ On The Run, 9th St / Irving in SF \_ Go to La Foot on College (near Ashby). They will watch you walk and suggest good shoes for you. Expect to pay between $80 and $130 or so. \_ What about $40 Saucony's? \_ Athletic Performance (55 W. Main St., Los Gatos). Everyone has different requirements & feet (eg, do you over-pronate?). They'll help you find the right shoe. \_ a rec based on personal experience -- asics. If they fit your particular foot shape, they're good shoes. --jon \_ can you trust what they tell you at these specialty stores or are they just there to convince you to buy more expensive shoes? \- at minimum they should look at the bottom of your shoes and watch you walk. you can tell a lot based on the wear pattern. also they will at least measure your footwidth. some companies make many widths [like NewBalance] ... so if you have unusual foot dimensions, NB is a good company to go with. Nike has some good shoes but they fall apart easily ... then again that is why I havent bought any Nikes in yrs. --psb \_ With good shoe salespeople, not at all. I was actually recommended a cheaper shoe than the one I was looking at. The key is, they want repeat business from you, because shoes are really only good for 500 miles or 8-12 months (that's assuming regular running). Chains like Foot Locker don't give a flying fuck... they just want all your money now (not to mention they dunno anything about shoes beyond what's in the pamplets). |
3/15 |