| ||||||
| 2003/6/7-8 [Recreation/Dating] UID:28659 Activity:high |
6/6 http://www.rootcellar.net/lila/kchang So lila&kchang are bitter suicidal ex? Is lila a psycho? \_ No. -mice \_ i never even met him in real life. i just enjoyed making fun of him on wall along with everyone else. -lila \_ your page certainly makes you look like a psycho. \_ Man, you need to meet some real psychos before you call that stuff bad. \_ nah, it just makes her look childish. it doesn't make kchang look any worse than her. the whole thing looks like a bitter ex-gf and her friend bashing the guy in a bitter psycho ex-gf kind of way. \_ If I was lila, I'd take down the kchang pages. Or better yet, would never put them up in the first place. \_ Isn't this the girl that posts pictures of herself with big black dildos and then wonders why she can't find a job? \_ Depends. Were the pics X, R, PG13, PG, or G rated? |
| 2003/6/7-8 [Computer/HW/Laptop] UID:28660 Activity:nil |
6/6 Why do I get this message when I starts on my debian laptop?
"warning: process set to nice value 0 instead of -10 as requested"
\_ because XFree86 is trying to set its priority to higher than that
of a standard process, (presumably to make things more reponsive
in X but since you're a non-root user, you're not allowed to boost
the priority of a program to higher than normal -dwc |
| 2003/6/7-8 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux, Computer/SW/OS/SCO] UID:28661 Activity:high |
6/6 Why is the SCO case a big deal? If there is indeed copied
code (which is far from certain), what prevents the linux
community from re-writing those files? (Assuming that it is
only a few files, of course - all unknown still).
\_ SCO says: "That's like saying, 'show us the fingerprints on
\_ SCO won't disclose affected source code w/o an NDA.
SCO: "That's like saying, 'show us the fingerprints on
the gun so you can rub them off.'"
\_ Because you can't use someone else's IP and then get caught red
handed and then simply stop using it without penalty.
\_ True - but this doesn't change the fact that the linux
source code is out in public, and once the piece that was
plagarized (if that was truly the case) is known, what is
to stop the community from replacing it and proceeding as
previously?
\_ you're still ignoring the fact that you can't just say, "oh!
we got busted! we'll just change that bit and go on with life!
thanks for letting us use your IP for years at your expense!"
\_ Nothing. But they will claim Linux's success was due in part
to their stolen code, therefore they can claim a percentage
of past and future earnings from Linux distributors. The
analogy is if you stole $1000 and used it to build a very
successful business, then you got caught. Does returning the
$1000 mean no crime has been committed? Does the victim have
any claim to the business?
\_ Linux distributors have no earnings. And the analogy to
stealing money is a false one; most copyright cases don't
involve monetary damages. The likely result is a
patent cross-signing agreement. -tom
\_ BZZZT! That's between real companies and this isn't a
patent case and what patents would IBM swap for the
shitty copyright on some code? Also, they don't always
simply swap patents. Sometimes it's for real and the
thieves owe the IP holders tens or even hundreds of
millions of dollars plus are not allowed to use the IP
in the future. The Linux distributors certainly do
have earnings. The analogy to stealing money is
exactly correct. Unlike you, I've actually worked on
real patent and copyright cases for real lawyers in
real courts in the real world where the 'rules of
slashdot' don't apply.
\_ did you ACTUALLY work on REAL patents for REAL
lawyers? You may be right about this but it
is you racking up the twink points pal.
\_ We greatly value your insight, O anonymous
coward. -tom
\_ Thank goodness his anonymity completely
invalidates anything he has to say. -mice
\_ I'm anonymous and, unlike you, still know wtf
I'm talking about. Patent cross-signing when
it's a copyright claim? Copyright violations
don't involve monetary damages? No earnings at
Redhat, IBM, Dell, and other linux distributors?
You get a dozen twink points *and* you've again
proven that you're a complete idiot. |
| 2003/6/7 [Computer/Networking] UID:28662 Activity:nil |
6/6 where can I find ebook text like the Steven's tcp/ip posted
last time? Kazza? |
| 2003/6/7 [Uncategorized] UID:28663 Activity:nil |
6/6 UT2K4 Screenshots: http://csua.org/u/35z (avault.com) |
| 2003/6/7-8 [Transportation/Airplane] UID:28664 Activity:moderate |
6/6 I need to fly from LAX to Denver in September and the airfare is
like $275, which is ridiculous since I can fly cross country
for barely more than that. Is there some trick to get a
reasonable airfare for a market that obviously doesn't have
enough competition. I'm assuming that I'm not going to be able to
save $100 by using priceline. Am I wrong about that?
\_ why dont you enter your price in priceline and find out..
thats the whole point of priceline.. you name your price
duhhh
\_ Cuz I won't get frequent flyer miles, nor will I be able to
choose the time of day of the flight. Priceline would be a
last resort.
\_ It is ridiculous. Half of that is probably just taxes so
I wouldn't expect priceline to give you that huge of a discount.
\_ laugh, priceline will take your money if u underbid
\_ Try searching on http://www.expedia.com and save the itinerary for
a few flights. The price fluctuates depending on fuel prices,
bookings, phase of the moon, etc., so if you check every few
days you can buy the ticket when the price is lowest. I've
seen fluctuations on the order of 20-30% over a few weeks.
Also, try flying into and out of other nearby airports. Finally
flying on certain days (Tuesdays and Thursdays, I think) is
cheaper. Good luck. -emin
\_ Do you think it could go down by 30% even during the summer
months?
\_ RIDE BIKE!
\_ http://biddingfortravel.com |
| 2003/6/7-8 [Computer/SW/Editors/Vi] UID:28665 Activity:high |
6/7 What are some programs that can automatically word wrap (like how
pine does it)?
\_ pico
\_ emacs
\_ emacs, pico, vi, any vi clone, any emacs clone, any word processor
written in the last 20 years
\_ to be fair, emacs and vi aren't exactly helpful about doing it.
For emacs M-x auto-fill-mode toggles word wrap, M-q rewraps
the lines if you add into the middle of the paragraph, and
in general it is kinda a pain in the ass. I forget how to
do it in vi.
\_ How is M-q any more difficult than, say, Pico's C-j? If you
want constant word-wrapping, use a real word processor.
\_ word-wrap is enabled in pico by default.
\_ and emacs auto-fill can be stuck in .emacs.
\_ and auto word wrap can be inserted into .emacs
\_ duh. I didn't say it couldn't. the point is that
it's not emacs' default behavior.
\_ As for vim, use: set tw=N (number of characters per line).
The "gq" command in vi mode formats unformated lines (over line
ranges if you like) . You can also configure it to use set tw=X
automatically when you open certain types of files (e.g. only
when editing mail messages and /etc/motd.public
\_ and if you don't run vim, you can pipe to fmt:
!}fmt -72<return>
pipes the content of the file from point to the end of the
paragraph to fmt. you can also bind this to a key.
\_ why would anyone want to word wrap when editing /etc/motd.public?
\_ nice. |
| 2003/6/7-8 [Reference/Religion, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:28666 Activity:nil |
6/7 http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/07/national/07DEPO.html?ex=1055563200&en=85b98a6079118552&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE Dubya is deporting 13,000 Muslims who came forward to sign up for his registration list who have no ties to terrorism. \_ Yes but hes giving them each a free pig as consolation. This story was written by Blair no doubt. \_ Racist! |
| 2003/6/7-8 [Uncategorized] UID:28667 Activity:kinda low |
6/7 What are some programs that can automatically add 1 + 1 like my
free 4 function solar calculator does it?
\_ uh, what? are you having trouble adding 1 + 1?
\_ expr |
| 2003/6/7-8 [Reference/History/WW2/Germany, Reference/History/WW2] UID:28668 Activity:kinda low |
6/7 First Wave at Omaha Beach - a recounting by military
historian S.L.A. Marshall from 1960
http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/60nov/omaha.htm
\_ More dead rich white men tooting their horns about how bravely
they murdered and oppressed a foreign peoples. |