Berkeley CSUA MOTD:2003:May:27 Tuesday <Monday, Wednesday>
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
2003/5/27-28 [Transportation/Car, Politics/Foreign/Asia/China] UID:28559 Activity:very high
5/26    What happens when OSHA isn't looking:
        http://ridah.net/stuff/safety.jpg
        \_ Does Toyota make forklifts?  If not, we know this is a toyota plant.
        \_ Does Toyota make forklifts?  If not, we know this is a toyota
           plant.
           \_ Yes, Toyota does make forklifts.
        \_ That's hilarious.  But the 2 guys on the orange lift should be
           sitting on the back of the yellow one to keep it from tipping.
           \_ The yellow forklift won't tip over.  If there weren't any
        \_ I bet this is in China.
                                - Chinese geek
              guys on the orange forklift, how could they operate the
              orange forklift?
           \_ Forklifts have counterweights to prevent tipping.
        \_ I bet this is in China. - Chinese geek
           \_ Except those guys don't look Chinese.
              \_ They look kind of Philipino to me.
                 \_ Hmmm, all Filipino workforce...that narrows it down to
                    about a hundred coutries.
                    \_ could be Indonesian, Malaysian, Vietnamese
                 \_ Filipino
                    \_ Pilipino
                        \_ that is a valid option
           \_ It's an Iraqi WMD plant.
        \_ Never ever hire anyone named Homer Simpson at your work.
2003/5/27 [Politics/Domestic/California, Reference/Tax] UID:28560 Activity:insanely high
5/26    I don't understand why people are opposed to raising taxes for
        people who have more children. It is a fundamental question of
        fairness.  For example, primary and secondary education is funded
        mostly by property taxes at the county and city level.  Two couples
        buy similary priced house and pay roughly the same amt of property tax.
        One couple has 1 kid and another couple has 3 kids.  The couple with
        3 kids is using up more tax payer resources so why shouldn't they
        pay more.  We can't easily restructure the property tax system.  And
        everybody should chip in to make public education work regardless of
        whether you have kids.  But the people whoe use it more should pay
        more.
        \_ keeping kids in school lowers crime rates. Think about it as
           social insurance. If you want to pay less in taxes for schools,
           live in a low property value area. You get the idea.
        \_ public education is a service to everyone.  a better educated
           populace (should) translate to a better and more productive
           \_ because everyone who isn't a single male sysadmin making 6 figures
              is a degenerate freeloader who should pay for their own damn
              social services.  haven't you been paying attention? are you
              a commie?
        \_ You can't argue about taxes like this.  You need to state your
           moral philosophy, including what you believe the inherent human
           rights are.  After you do this, the tax system will naturally
           follow.  Without doing this, you are just chewing the fat endlessly.
           workforce.  The benefit is not only to the family with kids.
           So, we have decided (however reluctantly and increasingly
           underfunded) to provide a publicly funded education system.
        \_ What if you look at it this way:  every kid is a future tax
           resource.  Each kid is likely to pay for his own education
           in his life via taxes he pays.  So why stick it to his parents,
           who're kindly providing this future tax resource at great
           expense already?
           \_ because everyone who isn't a single male sysadmin making 6
              figures is a degenerate freeloader who should pay for their
              own damn social services.  haven't you been paying attention?
              are you a commie?
              \_ what is wrong with Commie?
                 \_ maybe you missed the part where the Berlin Wall fell?
                        \_ Perhaps you forgotten your "facts" after
                           leaving Berkeley. The fall of the berlin
                           wall was a due to the uncontrollable
                           destructive, oppressive, exploitive,
                           racist, profiteering, non-collectivist,
                           anti-abortion, anti-worker, earth
                           and woman raping, genocide commiting,
                           firearms bearing, suv driving, slave
                           owing, gay-murdering, witch-hunting,
                           arab hating tendencies of theistic
                           judaea-christian greco-roman anglo-saxon
                           indo-european materialistic capitalist
                           millionare fat-cat pig dog vultures.
                           \_ After I left Berkeley I was free to express the
                              truth without fear of some club bearing, man
                              hating, unshowered butch lesbian trying to beat
                              me to death.  Free at last!  Free at last!  Thank
                              God Almighty, I'm free at last!
                    \_ Perhaps you forgotten your "facts" after leaving
                       Berkeley. The fall of the berlin wall was a due to the
                           \_ I agree.  uncontrolled capitalism of
                              the late 19th century causes the rise
                              of commies.  the kindler, gentler
                              version advocated by liberuls
                              resulted in the fall of the commies.
                           \_ Oh you poor oppressed upper middle class
                              white men!
                       uncontrollable destructive, oppressive, exploitive,
                       racist, profiteering, non-collectivist, anti-abortion,
                       anti-worker, earth and woman raping, genocide commiting,
                       firearms bearing, suv driving, slave owing,
                       gay-murdering, witch-hunting, arab hating tendencies of
                       theistic judaea-christian greco-roman anglo-saxon
                       indo-european materialistic capitalist millionare fat-cat
                       pig dog vultures.
                       \_ After I left Berkeley I was free to express the truth
                          without fear of some club bearing, man hating,
                          unshowered butch lesbian trying to beat me to death.
                          Free at last!  Free at last!  Thank God Almighty, I'm
                          free at last!
                       \_ you forgot the part about 'goat sodomizing
                          baby-murdering, gluttonous'
                       \_ I agree.  uncontrolled capitalism of the late 19th
                          century causes the rise of commies.  the kindler,
                          gentler version advocated by liberuls resulted in the
                          fall of the commies.
           the children!", "family values" issue.
                       \_ Oh you poor oppressed upper middle class white men!
                          \_ Who here is upper middle class?
           \_ Indeed.  Growing up, my folks' income was marginal poverty
              level. I got through Cal on merit- and need-based scholarships,
              loans and work.  In 2000 I paid of the last of my student
              loans and cashed in stock options--and paid more in taxes than
              my parents annual income the year I started Cal.  (Oh, and I'm
              still in CA forking money over in state taxes, so I believe the
              investment has paid off.)
              \_ Are you voting Republican yet?
                 \_ If he's smart, he is.
                 \_ Yes--I have been since I was 18.
              \_ I never paid enough tax for myself in CA before I had to
                 leave in order to get a job.  Damned economy.  I liked CA.
                 \_ CA just got a few billion in bailout (2.x billion?) from the
                    latest budget plan.  Everyone in the US subsidized CA this
                    year.
                    \_ Only fair since CA pays more in taxes than it gets
                       back almost every year.
                    \_ Too late for me.  I had to leave CA a year ago.  And
                        $2G is a drop in the bucket of CA's problem.  Further,
                        it won't help anyone get a job, it'll just help keep
                        the CA gov't going.
        \_ they have that.  it's called one-child policy in China.  while
           nothing wrong with tax policies to encourage certain birthrate
           pattern, I don't like the way you talked about "fairness"
           in tax policies.  The tax policies is never fair for anyone.
        \_ there's no such thing as a "fair" tax policy.  even a flat tax
           will hurt lower income people more than higher income people.  it
           is time for you to understand that life just isn't fair.  once you
           fully absorb this concept, you'll find the rest of your life is
           much more enjoyable.  sometimes you gotta break an egg to etc etc.
           I've got no kids, I'm married and plan to not have kids and don't
           have a problem with the current system.
        \_ "fairness" is an important criterion for designing and evaluating
           a tax system, however it is not the only criterion.  I tend to
           agree with you that there is too much tax benefits for breeding
           like pigs (dependant, child tax credit, etc., etc.).  However,
           you are going to be very lonely on this cause it's a "think about
           the children!", "family values" issue.  both the democrats and
           the republicans are suckers for these.
           \_ No, actually it's about spending money on them now so they don't
              break into my home later.  Prisons are expensive.
              \_ do it with progressive tax which doesn't encourage breeding
                 as much as child tax crdit.  or give child tax credit to
                 the first two kids only.   if you can't educate your kids
                 well, stop breeding, or at least, don't expect me to
                 subsidize your breeding.
                 \_ Right -- it's much better to subsidize a larger police
                    force and much more extensive and overcrowded jails after
                    those kids break into your home and rape your wife when
                    they become adults.
                    \_ education hasn't worked.  The current system already
                       subsidizes the poor.  How has that worked out?  Kids are
                       still dropping out.  Throwing money at the problem
                       hasn't done anything.  Washington DC has the highest
                       tax burden of any region.  It still has one of the
                       highest murder rates in the country.  Taking away these
                       subsidies and steralizing people on welfare will get
                       rid of the problem once and for all.  No bad kids, no
                       problem.  Also sterlizing illegal immigrants arrested
                       in the U.S.  Just to cover all the bases.
        \_ Actually, all tax laws in CA are hard to change. You need the
           magic 2/3+1 supermajority to pass tax laws. Perhaps you're thinking
           of charging a "fee" for use of public education? Think about how
           hard that is for the UC and CSU system and multiply it by 10.
           \_ Not hard at all.  Didn't they just raise UC rates by $500 or
              more?  I also read summer students got hit with a bonux $150
              charge only a few days before summer classes started.  -alum
           \_ No you don't.  They changed the law, or didn't you hear to only
              require 55%.
           \_ A judge can change the law whenever he feels like it.  It used to
              be the case that local property taxes went to local schools.
              Judicial fiat changed that.
2003/5/27-28 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Israel] UID:28561 Activity:high
5/27    Not a big deal, just funny in a absurd way:
        AP - Late Monday, Israeli soldiers fired on four diplomatic vehicles
        in the northern Gaza town of Beit Hanoun, diplomats said. No one was
        hurt. ... two bullets hit the windshield of the Swiss Consulate's
        armored car, and diplomatic cars of Sweden, Denmark and the European
        Union also came under fire.

        The military expressed regret, saying soldiers fired to break up a
        crowd of Palestinians and bullets inadvertently hit the diplomat's
        vehicle.  http://csua.org/u/317
        \_ http://www.masada2000.org
        \_ Israel has no respect of international law whatsoever, this is just
           one of many acts.  Intercept ship in interntaional water a week
           ago is just another example.  If Israel really want to win the
           legimacy, it will need to play by the rules, otherwise, it is no
           different from the sucide bombers it is fighting against.
           \_ Bad Jew!  Stop defending yourself!  Bad Jew!  Bad!  Role over
              and die to make French and Arabs happy!  Bad Jew!  Die Jew!  Die!
              Never again, son, never again.
2003/5/27-28 [Consumer/Audio] UID:28562 Activity:insanely high
5/27    Want to see the latest super-expensive home theater & audiophile gear?
        http://www.he2003.com in SF June 6-8 -eric
        \_ yeah but it sounds pretty much the same as the sub-$1000 crap.
        \_ I always find it fascinating how people can still build expensive
           audio replay equipment when everything involved is basically really
           old technology which has been more or less replicated by $30
           digital equipment. As for the quality difference, only if you are a
           dog can you really hear the difference. It's like Rolex, a $5
           digital kid watch probably keeps better time.
           \_ that's why it is for audiophiles and not for everyone.
           \_ Ever met a real audiophile?  If you think $30 digital crap from
              best buy can equal a $5k tube system in quality, you're tone
              deaf or you've never heard the tube system.  I'm not at all an
              audiophile nor do I have a great ear but I can hear it easily.
              \_ Define what a "real audiophile" is. I've met "real" physicians
                 and studied under them. I know that the human ear is
                 incapable of telling the difference that the majority of
                 this equipment is claiming to reproduce. The
                 ear just isn't that sensitive, and the rest is just
                 placebo. Next thing you're going to tell me that "real"
                 chronometerphiles have an inbred ability to tell
                 time better than everyone else and that's why
                 they need a Rolex. Face it, it's the same
                 as buying a Fendi bag vs. just a regular handbag. It's
                 all just snob value after a certain price point.
                 \_ Nice try.  I knew a doctor on TV once, too.  That makes me
                    know all about TV broadcasting equipment.  Or something
                    like that.  Just because you know *nothing* about a field
                    doesn't mean others don't.  I don't believe in Java, Unix,
                    or Intel chips.  They just can't possibly work!  I knew an
                    engineer once so I know this is true!  Yeah!  That's the
                    ticket!  I'm a midnight motd posting uber genius, like you!
                 \_ Can you provide an example of something an audio equip.
                    manufacturer claims to reproduce that the human ear
                    ear is incapable of detecting?
              \_ can ordinary people distinguish $1500 and $6000 equipment?
                 \_ this is for audiophiles, and not everybody.
           \_ It starts getting crazy when these people can hear differences
              just by using different cables.
        \_ I once auditioned speakers around the $300-600/pair range. I was
           surprised I could actually hear differences among them (I was quite
           skeptical that I could), but the problem was, I couldn't tell which
           speakers actually sounded "correct." I read reviews with words
           like "warm" and "neutral sound" and "imaging" and I'm thinking WTF?
           \_ If you are buying, then you should trust your ears. Go with
              whatever sound you like.
        \_ for those who like speakers, what speakers do you have and how
           much did you get them for?
           \_ B&W DM601 (first series I believe). $500/pair at the time.
              Absolutely no complaints with them. The center channel cost me
              an extra $250.
              \- the audiophile stuff is sort of like wine: you should
              feel welcome to listen to/drink the $100speakers/$5bottle.
              if you think there isnt a difference between $100 speakers
              and $1000 speakers or a $10bottle and $100bottle, you are a
              moron or physically defective. yes, the expensive stuff is
              sometimes hype. yes some people go overboard ... like the
              "magic liquid stereo cable" people or the "grapes grown 10feet
              apart have different terroir effects" ... and have their head
              up their ass. --psb
                \_ $100 to $1000 is easy... i'm a total nonaudiophile and
                   i can tell the difference there. it's $1000 -> $10000
                   for speakers and $100->$1000 for wine that are
                   much harder to differentiate..
                        \_ I find it hard to believe that anyone who says
                           there's no difference between $10/bottle wine
                           and $50-$100/bottle wine can actually have
                           gone up to Napa and *tasted* some of the
                           expensive stuff.  It's easy to tell the
                           difference.  (Whether it's worth the price to
                           you is another, more personal matter.)  Above
                           $100 you start getting into real hype, yeah.
                          (ps:  whoops, originally misread psb... read
                           "is" for "isn't".  We're all violently agreeing...)
                           \- well i think part of the qustion is "does a
                              $60 reidel glass make the wine taste better
                              than a $5 wine glass" ... supposedly there is
                              a reason for the different shapes of wine
                              glasses. i think that is where a lot of the
                              bunko is. same for some of the ridiculous
                              claims about audio cables. --psb
                              \_ Try drinking wine from a coffee mug.
                   \_ I think wine is a bit different. I've tasted expensive
                      wine, and I will agree it tastes different from a $10 or
                      $50 bottle, but whether it's better is debatable. It's
                      just different with no negative or positive connotation.
                      I suppose if I knew what to look for when tasting (beyond
                      just if I like the taste or not), then I could appreciate
                      and perhaps even justify ordering the pricier stuff at
                      a restaurant.
2003/5/27-28 [Politics/Foreign/Asia/China, Politics/Domestic/President/Bush] UID:28563 Activity:high
5/26    Bush Ban on Chinese Imports
        http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/5/27/133053.shtml
        \_ Good for Bush.
        \_ Even a broken clock tells the right time twice a day.
                \_ I love Chinese proverb. Where can I find more?
           \_ Yeah, it would be terrible to give Bush credit for doing
              something you like.
              \_ If Bush did it, he can't like it.  If Bush found and shared
                 the Fountain of Youth, he'd complain about how all these
                 newly young people are hiking through the woods and killing
                 the owls' natural habitat and it's all Bush's fault.  There's
                 nothing like raw blind hatred to get you through the day.
                 \_ mmm, conservative hypocracy...
                    \_ I don't think that word means what you think it means.
                    \_ Hell, I don't think that word is spelled the way you
                       think it is.
                    \_ Conservatives do not believe in hate. They believe
                       in tolerance and using reason to convince their
                       opponents. See Rush Limbaugh, Micheal Savage, Ann
                       Coulter, Fox News, etc.
                        \_ and if that doesn't work, we can always invade
                           the country in the name of WMD and democracy.
        \_ Generally, not a Bush fan - op
        \_ hypocrisy written all over.   If anything, USA is the one
           who has the global ambition of be the hegemony of the world.
           It is USA that has the 2nd large stockpiles of WMD and had
           history of unleashing on defendless civilians for "moral"
           "communication" and "scientific" reasons.  USA is the
           largest arms dealer in the world.  And many of its product
           is also manufactured by prisoners.
Berkeley CSUA MOTD:2003:May:27 Tuesday <Monday, Wednesday>