|
2002/12/27-28 [Computer/HW/Laptop] UID:26921 Activity:very high |
12/26 My sister is looking to buy a laptop under $500. Has to be new but obviously not top of the line. Anybody know of a good reputable place that sells NEW but older model laptops? She just need the basic stuff like built in CD, floppy, modem, ethernet, etc. Recommendation on brand and model would also help. Thanks. \_ i think this is impossible. \_ not bloody likely, but it's possible she could get lucky on an auction site like ebay or ubid. also check http://techbargains.com for sales. but ultimately, it's snowball meets hell. \_ I want world peace. \_ "Has to be new" and "under $500" is a problem. Get a USED IBM Thinkpad. \_ For 500, you can get thinkpads with a year of warranty left. \_ How about refurbs? You might be able to get a refurb from Dell, IBM or Apple for ~ $500. \_ Or a used pismo. \_ iBooks are quite durable. I just sold one for $400 on craigslist. \_ The pismo's (PowerBook G3 (2000)) are also quite reliable. \_ is your sister hott? \_ yeah does she give good head? i have extra laptops. \_ Get a new PDA with a keyboard. \_ I really think this is a bad idea... even if by some miracle you were able to find a "new" laptop for this price, all the technology would be so old, it'd be obsolete in 5 minutes. What's wrong with buying a refurb'ed one (often come with same or similar waranties) that has newer features? \_ How does a Pentium II system get obsolete? Mine has a dvd player, pcmcia slots for wireless. Unless I want to game, it does everything. \_ Just wondering, has anyone here ever bought a refurbished piece of hardware and not had problems with it? -!OP anything that is neither here nor there. \_ Yes. I've bought a refurb macs, suns and sgi's (for home and work). The only problems I've had was with stuff like memory and sbus cards that didn't survive UPS/USPS's brand of tender-loving care. The systems all worked. --ranga \_ we've set up entire companies with refurb sun's from recurrent. \_ Either get something really cheap and disposable like under $175, or get something decent for like $800 or above. Don't get anything that is neither here nor there. More precisely, get something cheap and disposable, or get something that can run w2k, that is, if you are going the windows route. \_ I have had a lot of luck with used laptops from EBay. \_ ObIsSheHot? \_ ObYou'reAnIdiotSomeoneAskedThisAlready |
2002/12/27 [Recreation/Computer/Games, Recreation/Sports] UID:26922 Activity:high |
12/26 What is the best way to make a Linux game (xlander) run slower? \_ hit the turbo button on your 386 \_ on a pentium. \_ Change the program so that it doesn't run faster if it gets extra CPU time. Use the Source, Luke! |
2002/12/27-28 [Computer/SW] UID:26923 Activity:kinda low |
12/26 What's the proper way to endorse a check over to a third party? \_ what does endorsing a check to a third party mean? (serious question) \_ what does endorsing a check to a third party mean? (serious question) \_ Allowing a check to be cashed by someone else other than the stated recipient. Note that when you sign the back of the check that is endorsing it. In normal cases, the third party is a bank. \_ Signature Pay to the order of Third party or something like that. anything that makes it very clear. Or, you can just sign it, give it to them, and trust they don't lose it. http://www.pekinhigh.net/academics/voced/godby/03mcgina/mcginnis.htm \_ I got a rebate check from dell payable to the fictional company I used while buying from their small business division (I now know to just put my name as the company's name). The check says not to allow third party endorsements (above where you are supposed to endorse it). Nevertheless, I signed my own name and deposited it into my credit union account. Being on friendly terms with the teller lady and explaining the situation to her might have helped \_ I think generally if the check is small and you are depositing it in an account that has been around for a while banks just really don't care much. They figure the chance that you are going to scam them and they wont be able to just take the money out of your account if something is screwy just ain't worth the money carefully checking all those checks would take. |
2002/12/27-28 [Politics/Domestic/Crime, Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Iraq] UID:26924 Activity:very high |
12/27 http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N27279375 http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/27/science/27CLON.html Rael UFO cult clones human. According to the above news link, a raelian woman has actually given birth to a human clone yesterday. heres a link to the cult website: http://www.rael.org it seems to be down right now, however. \_ It's all over the place. You don't need hokey unheard of sites to read about it. There's also no proof yet. \_ more normal link added to appease whiner. \_ wanting a real news source is not whining. you want me to direct you to my personal website for real news? i think not. you'd find it equally questionable. and there's still no proof clonaid created a real clone, dolly style. (it's like "duh i read it on the net, it must be true!!!!") \_ You're too good for Reuters? You're so l337, duud. \_ http://alertnet.org? Whatever. If it doesn't have a real url from a real source, it's suspect. And no in general reuters is biased crap. youd see that if you read it with a critical eye and questioned the material instead of swallowing it like a sheep. \_ How is reuters any more biased than any other news source in the whole fucking world? If you had any idea what a critical eye is, you would have avoided looking so stupid here by actually looking for more info on this yourself instead of abusing the OP with your nonsense. And, if you would, please point out where the original article posted is biased. \_ Idiot, I had already read other news sources long before the OP posted here. It doesn't even take a mildly critical eye to note I said the news was already all over the place. You're an idiot and only look that much more stupid falsely accusing someone of something they're not guilty of but *you* are. Sheesh, motd posters. And the article is *still* just about some nutty cult making some claims. Nothing is proved. Come back when some one reputable has verified it. |