|
2002/11/26-27 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux] UID:26632 Activity:very high |
11/26 on Linux file system (ext2/ext3)... I know that the superblock is repeated every X of blocks. and yes, my linux partition's superblock got fucked up... block 8193 is corrupt as well... which superblock is next? --googled and find no answer \_ From the mke2fs manpage: -S Write superblock and group descriptors only. This is useful if all of the superblock and backup superblocks are corrupted, and a last-ditch recovĀ ery method is desired. It causes mke2fs to reiniĀ superblocks are corrupted, and a last-ditch recovM-- ery method is desired. It causes mke2fs to reiniM-- tialize the superblock and group descriptors, while not touching the inode table and the block and inode bitmaps. The e2fsck program should be run immediately after this option is used, and there is no guarantee that any data will be salvageable. Never tried this myself, but I try to avoid redhat. --scotsman \_ Depends on the options to mke2fs. Default options depend on your distro. \_ Some versions of newfs when given the proper parameters will give you the alternate super block list. I'd give you the exact options but I'd rather you checked the man pages for newfs and got it exactly right for your distro. I don't want to be responsible for wiping your drive by telling you something that might be wrong on your system. \_ anything is welcome. I don't have that many thing important on that Linux box, and worse comes worse I will reinstall it. Just that I have encountered this very very often, and I would like to find a way to fix it... in case that there is something important on my linux box in teh future. \_ Ok then, try "newfs -N <device>", where <device> is going to be something like /dev/hd0c or whatever the path is to the hard drives on your distro. Please check the man pages that -N option exists and that it only prints the parameters for the device in question as it does on mine. You want the character device, not the block device. \_ there is no newfs. only zuul. \_ tried newfs prior to my post on motd, newfs doesn't come with Redhat. \_ I believe it repeats every 8192 blocks, so just add 8192 to 8193, try to restore the superblock from there, rinse, repeat. \_ tried... "Bad Magic Number in super-block while trying to open /dev/hdc3" \_ are you assuming the first superblock is at 0? then you need to re-check your math. --aaron \_ man fsck.ext2 and look at -b option. tune2fs -l /dev/whatever will tell you if you have sparse superblocks --dwc |
2002/11/26 [Uncategorized] UID:26633 Activity:nil |
11/25 Birds of Prayer officially dead. Firedfly is next. |
2002/11/26 [Recreation/Media] UID:26634 Activity:high |
11/25 I saw attack of the clones on DVD saturday. It wasn't THAT bad. Why were you people bitching and moaning about it? My expectations were so low going into it that I actually enjoyed the movie. Next time espisode III comes out, don't expect anything! \_ it sucks that a movie that looks so pretty and obviously had so much effort put into it... just sucks. the acting sucks. the plot makes no sense. did you really care who's army was fighting who at the end? what's with the stupid dialogue? ok the fett and yoda scenes were cool. [formatd] \_ Yeah, the acting sucked. And I thought the romance scenes were overdone. But I think you really weren't supposed to care about siding with an army. They are all just puppets in the grand scheme and nothing can be done about it. \_ It was that bad. The rest of us had only modest expectations for a movie that simply didn't suck and paid money for that shit. \_ I thought Attack of the Clones was better than Return of the Jedi, but not nearly up to the first two. Sure the dialog was stupid and the acting was bad, but that is true of all the Star Wars movies. -tom \_ I agree with Tom. You others sound like bitter old men. \_ wait, I'm supposed to be the bitter old man around here. -tom \_ you're not old, a man, or particularly bitter. you're just overly self centered and have an overblown ego which are entirely different flaws. \_ gee, anonymous insults are so enlightening. -tom \_ All 3 of the first movies were better than these last 2. The only problem RotJ had was the friggin Ewok warrior teedy bear for-sale-in-stores-now! thing it had going. \- immediately after seeing CLONE i might have ranked it above RoJ but after seeing it again, I would probably give the nod to RoJ. You cant easily recover from the "Phantom Legacy". I have added to ~psb/When_Clones_Attack --psb |
2002/11/26 [Uncategorized] UID:26635 Activity:nil |
11/25 I think I'm rather sick, because when I glanced over a Yahoo News headline "U.S. busts largest-ever identity theft ring" all I saw was "U.S. busts largest-ever ......". \_ why were you sick? you not into the girls? |
2002/11/26 [Computer/SW/OS/FreeBSD] UID:26636 Activity:high |
11/25 i have just downloaded the freebsd 4.7 *.iso files. now, how do i burn these *.iso files to the cdrom? like what search words to search for more info at google, softwares capable of this, etc. would be greatly appreciated. \_ assuming you are using windows you will need roxio easy cd or nero or something similar.. xp built in cd writer wont burn from an iso -shac \_ there is also the free cdrecord software available for win32. actually i guess they call it "cdrtools". \_ just use whatever CD burning software that you have. \_ What platform are you working from? If it's FreeBSD w/ ATAPI (ie, not-SCSI) search for "burncd". I believe it's in the handbook as well. \_ uh what OS did you download them with? \_ please rethink if you want to run freebsd \_ you just never quit do you? \_ yeah, see the thread below. \_ hi paolo! |
2002/11/26 [Uncategorized] UID:26637 Activity:nil |
11/26 motd sex poll. intercourse during menstrual period: always: sometimes: .. never: only: |
2002/11/26 [Uncategorized] UID:26638 Activity:nil |
11/25 http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2002541855,00.html She's still so hot after all these years! MJ eat your heart out! |
2002/11/26-27 [Computer/HW/CPU, Computer/HW/Drives] UID:26639 Activity:very high |
11/26 A serious question about this: http://www.apple.com/xserve I have zero experience with recent apple hardware or software. My company needs rock solid NFS hosts at low cost. Performance isn't an issue. The clients will be Solaris 2.7 and Linux 2.4. Do any of you have any experience with this? Does it sound good/bad to you and why? Any info, urls, whatever is much appreciated. BTW, this isn't a religious issue. I just want something that will work and isn't going to cost me an arm and a leg like EMC, Hitachi, or IBM and I sure as hell don't want to start building my own. Thanks! \_ I'd be wary of any ATA array. IDE just isn't designed for large file service projects. Also, this sort of thing looks like super overkill for what you describe. I suggest finding a good supplier of prebuilt *nix boxes, preferably something running a BSD tcp stack for the sake of NFS. I found a fibre channel array from http://corpsys.com that runs $1700 per .5TB. Had no trouble with it yet under windows 2k, mandrake, and freebsd. Alternatively, you may want to look at the Sun A1000 line. --scotsman \_ I would not consider the XServe as a general-purpose server at this point. Apple just doesn't have a server pedigree (except a pedigree of abandoning their server products). -tom \_ apple's xserve is an incredible piece of hardware, but overkill for what you need. build a box from http://pixelusa.com. also, dell has $1k 1U servers with one year of on site support and two more years of by-mail support. \_ Solaris has a great NFS support and the most featureful NFS implementation. Why would you want to serve Solaris client with anything other than a Solaris server? \_ because Sun's low-end server hardware sucks. \_ In what respect? Do you really need 3GHz Athlon CPU on an NFS server? Take a look at Sun Fire V120, a very decent low-end server. \_ their hardware also is unreasonably expensive, as is support as well as people who know solaris. \_ A configuration with 1 GB RAM, 72 GB of disk, and a 650-mhz processor is $6000. You can get 3 much faster Intel boxes for that much. \_ What they gain in speed, they loose in software robustness and support. Specially, if you need an NFSserver, the question should be a no brainer. Also, who pays the list price for Sun hardware? Talk to a salesman. They'll slash the price by up to 50% depending on how deep your pockets are. \_ Mylex DAC960 controller. You can put together a real good x86 server for <<< $5k. Equivalent performance (and yes reliability) from Sun is gonna cost you three times as much, at least. And don't tell me Sun equipment is more reliable; some of my clients run thousands of high-load servers, and the Compaqs and Dells and other PC boxes of their world don't suffer any more outages. -John \_ I don't want to 'put together' 20+ new boxes. \_ ah. nweaver. \_ what software robustness and support do they lose? only if you screw together some parts from Fry's. \_ You get incomplete and unstable NFS support and funky RAID software. See the original poster's requirements. In addition to the IDE flakiness that someone mentioned, AFAIK, you can't mirror the boot disk on the xserve since it does not have an internal RAID controller and OS X probably does not support putting / on a software RAID device. Would you really like to take your server down for hours when the boot disk fails? If you're looking for a cost effective SCSI array consider the new Sun D2 (JBOD) or the 3310 series (hardware RAID). \_ Read the link above: OS X supports RAID devices. \_ But it doesn't support putting your root file system on software RAID. \- does apples weird file system with its weird case issues manifest themselves over nfs? this is a real annoyance for me when Makefile = makefile, configure = Configure etc. ok tnx. --psb \_ Forget software RAID anyway. Performance *is* an issue, although it may not be the determining issue. Buy yourself a hardware RAID card and stick it on a cheap PC with a gigabit NIC. --dim |
2002/11/26 [Recreation/Dating] UID:26640 Activity:nil 66%like:26642 |
11/26 Why do h07 azn chix have better looking skin? \_ than non-h07 azn chix? dunno. |
2002/11/26 [Uncategorized] UID:26641 Activity:high |
11/26 How to make six figure salaries working in IT? This is a serious question. -undergrad IT worker wannabe. \_ Get an MBA instead. \_ go back in time to 1999. \_ don't worry, with the new gestapo being started up under john poindexter, there will be *plenty* of government teat to suckle from. your job will be to help the effort to spy on everyone and track down thought crime. |
2002/11/26 [Recreation/Dating] UID:26642 Activity:nil 66%like:26640 |
11/26 Aaron, where did you get your noiseless h07 azn chix? |
3/15 |