|
2002/11/17-18 [Consumer/PDA] UID:26568 Activity:high |
11/15 I have a Sony Vaio... had it for almost 2 years. The screen has started flickering occasionally... it seems to be getting worse. Any suggestions on how/if I can get this repaired? I know alot of people have gone through hell trying to repair Sony's... any info would be welcome. Thanks. - rory \_I think I might know what's wrong. Send me an email. williamc \_ my condolences. GOOD LUCK. I can only offer the advice of keep searching the web, it's likely that someone else has encountered the problem. By the way, the last Sony laptop I tried to get fixed got me pissed because the sony phone tech wanted to charge me $10 before disclosing the part-number (just the part-NUMBER) not including the part itself! I just wanted to make sure it was the right part he was trying to sell me (since their web- site sucks so badly, the part wasnt listed. And the phone tech only had some cryptic part description ("harness jack") and no pictures) There are lots of design flaws in their laptops. Almost 2 yrs is about right. And tell us the damn model number if u want help PCG-F580... does that really help? _/ \_ Sonys seem to have a lot of problems and their tech support is bad. They wanted to charge me (to troubleshoot) because the software on their web site would not install. I haven't had any problems getting Sonys fixed (very fast turnaround) but I spent a lot of money fixing them and they need to be fixed often. A new display will be $700, btw. --dim \_ I guess one thing I'm trying to figure out is what it is that I may need to replace... the display seems fine, it looks clear, etc... but it is just this sporadic flickering that occurs... I'm guessing it is some kind of connecting cable or something. I'd like to be more educated before calling Sony or some other \_ don't kid yourself. Sony's call center is staffed by mostly clueless people. repair service... but have not yet been able to find any info on the web. \_ Send it in to Sony. They will send you a quote back. You will have the option of getting it fixed, having it disposed of, or having it shipped back to you. There is a diagnostic fee, but it's not too bad ($20 or $50). --dim \_ I was trying to replace the screen on a toshiba and found a few websites that sell parts for various laptops (such as new screens). Sorry I don't have it bookmarked but some googling will work. |
2002/11/17 [Science/GlobalWarming, Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:26569 Activity:very high |
11/15 Finally! The right common sense way for the US to deal with the rest of the world. I'm too young to have voted for him at the time but I sure wish the world had more leaders like this. We need this sort of courage in times like these. link:timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?artid=28466990 \_ Like sheep to the slaughter... It's too bad he wasn't around during WWII eh? \_ Do you propose then that we openly violate treaties that we have signed and expect other countries to follow? \_ why propose something that's already being done? \_ Name one. And don't name the anti-nuke treaty with the Soviets. There was an 'out' clause built into the original treaty and we legally exited. \_ invasion of Serbia without authorization of UN security consoul for one. GHB's authorization of invasion of Panama is another. For the rest, US just pressure other nation to sign but not signing it itself, including Univeral declaration of Women's right, Univeral ban on land mind, biological weapon, and nuclear test. \_ Serbia: say what? You're insane. It was a NATO sponsored action. You know, NATO? That treaty created org? Panama? What treaty was that? The one where we gave up control of the incredibly important PC to a bunch of third worlders? And for the rest, if we didn't sign it then we didn't break it. Your debate fu is weak. Try harder. I actually thought you might come up with something but I see I was correct: we didn't break any treaties: you're just spewing your agenda driven ignorance. \_ --"For every time an American gives a dollar, a citizen of Norway --gives 17 dollars," he [Carter] said." I'd love to see the numbers on this. \_ And the tax rates. And how much of American tax dollars have gone to keeping Norway a safe place to live. And how many immigrants they allow in and how easy it is to work or get citizenship there vs here. |
2002/11/17 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:26570 Activity:nil |
11/16 Somalis accuse Lewiston mayor of racism, bigotry http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/790307/posts \_ So tell me, was this posted by an anti-freeper? |
2002/11/17-18 [Computer/SW/Security] UID:26571 Activity:kinda low |
11/17 the last five paragraphs of from this article: http://www.cnn.com/2002/TRAVEL/11/16/airport.security.ap __ Ed Karabinus, 56, was a security manager at Shepard Air Force Base in Texas last winter when he traveled through Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport and encountered inefficient screeners who didn't speak English. He decided to become a screener himself. He took the test, and in March he was one of 61 people hired as supervisors. Eight months later, he has been promoted to federal security director, a new category of federal law enforcement officer, overseeing both Wichita Falls Municipal Airport in Texas and nearby Lawton Municipal Airport in Oklahoma. Federal security directors earn between $108,400 and $150,000 a year. Karabinus, who now drives a used Mercedes, motivates his screeners by saying, "Look where I went, guys, in eight months." -- DAMN, where can I get a job like that? \_ There are always special people in all sorts of jobs doing really well. They are the exceptions, not the rule. The typical airport security jock is making $8.50/hr and will get a COLA in 2 years to $8.75/hr. \_ They are federal employees now making more than that. I don't know how much more, but more than $17k/yr certainly. |
2002/11/17-18 [Recreation/Media] UID:26572 Activity:high |
11/16 MOTD Movie Critic Says, "Harry Potter 2: whatever you thought of the first HP movie, ditto. This one is exactly the same in all ways. This is only a bad thing if you didn't like the first one". \_ No...this one was geared much more for people that are fans of the book. The first one could have been watched (and was in fact watched) by people who are new to HP; this one relied a lot on having already read the story. This HP movie also had a lot of scenes that were excessively long. But I still liked it. -huge HP fan liked it. -huge HP fan (hHf) \_ I couldn't stand the Harry Potter books. I couldn't get past the gee-whiz kiddie feel. I can read the Narnia books or Tolkien as an adult and feel rewarded but for HP I would need a lobotomy. That said, I found the movie to be decent entertainment. \_ Talking about children's books that are worth rereading \_ 1) This movie wasn't such a literal translation as the \_ well, to be honest I was just going on memory for that. but compared to the H.P. I thought it was more original. again, I recently reread the Earthsea trillogy (which somehow grew to six books) for the first time since I was 12 or so, and damn if they aren't good books. -aspo \_ Narnia? I couldn't read Narnia as a HSer. Lord save you! \_ Did you read any of them other than the first? They get progressively darker (and much better). And if that has no significance for you...well then shit, do not carry equal weight. You're dismissed. they really aren't meant to be profound literary classics. They're just kids books that also appeal to older people too. I can't say with certainty that they won't be around in 50 years (like Tolkien, or Shakespeare), but then again I don't know that they won't, either. -hHf \_ Just another passing fad. \_ If it was a literal translation of the book, why did it rely so much on having read it in the first place? \_ 1) This movie wasn't as much of a literal translation as the first one, and 2) by making references to things that weren't explicitly explained or brought up already (or to things in the future, much like Star Wars). -hHf \_ Tsk. The MMC is not a fan of the books and in fact knows nothing about them except what was in the first movie and enjoyed both the first and second movies about the same. As a self proclaimed "huge HP fan" you're in no position to judge how much a non-fan such as the MMC would. Shame on your for questioning an MMC review with your ignorant pap. --MMC \_ Just the same way that you're in no position to judge how much you think everyone else will like it ("whatever you thought of the first HP movie, ditto"). -huge HP fan \_ Silly child. I am the MMC. You are nothing. Our views do not carry equal weight. You're dismissed. --MMC \_ Too bad. -hHf |
2002/11/17-18 [Computer/SW/SpamAssassin] UID:26573 Activity:low |
11/17 Who broke spamassassin? \_ And why hasn't anyone responded to email/motd requests to fix it? |