|
2002/11/10-11 [Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:26493 Activity:high |
11/9 What are some good programs for encrypting files in WinXP? Someone mentioned PGPdisk recently; is there anything better (cheaper, just as strong, just as trustworthy)? \_ gnupg on cygwin? \_ deltree is closely related to philgp. |
2002/11/10-11 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:26494 Activity:moderate |
11/9 remember roving profiles and bookmarks in netscape? is there something like that for mozilla? - danh \_ Nope. But it really needs it dammit. |
2002/11/10 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:26495 Activity:very high |
11/9 Maybe this was answered a long time ago, but why doesn't the MOTD displayed on the Soda website? \_ Someone with "issues" posted some really offensive stuff about a year ago and thus the web motd was pulled. Now there is nothing stopping you from keeping a copy in ~/public_html so you can read the motd via the web. \_ what was so offensive that it banned free speech? what's the command to use the melhalf (sp) command to view archived motd's? (i promise to write it down this time). \_ ~marco/bin/motdbrowse ... you may need to poke around the files in ~mehlhaff/tmp \_ since the motd is offensive just about every day to someone maybe you could give a general topic? how could someone decide which particular topic was the one? \_ Think about something significant that happened last year (say in sept.). And yes the motd offends people everyday, but in this case someone was offended enough to complain to root. \_ and that someone happened to suck the dick of the then CSUA president \_ dude, blowjob beats motd every fucking time, as it should. what kind of idiot are you? --aaron \_ dude, blowjob beats motd every fucking time, as it should. what kind of idiot are you? --aaron \_ thank you. --erikred |
2002/11/10-11 [Computer/SW/Unix] UID:26496 Activity:moderate |
11/9 what's a unix instant messenger client that supports icons? \_ gaim? |
2002/11/10 [Uncategorized] UID:26497 Activity:moderate |
11/9 Everything interesting purged from motd by anonymous censor-coward. I see business as usual is going strong on the motd. \_ get a life |
2002/11/10 [Uncategorized] UID:26498 Activity:nil |
11/9 Here a time waster for any of you stuck at work on this rainy saturday: http://www.ericmyer.com/stereotypes.htm |
2002/11/10 [Uncategorized] UID:26499 Activity:nil |
11/9 Will 2002 Leonids be better than 2001? \_ problem is it coincides with a full moon, which will overpower many of the smaller meteor streaks. Aside from that, this year is supposed to be better than last. |
2002/11/10-11 [Computer/SW/Mail, Academia/Berkeley/CSUA] UID:26500 Activity:high |
11/10 Is it possible for CSUA to automaticall forward all emails sent to <username>.* to username? So like joe.amazon@csua would go to username@csua. \_ no, that would require work \_ Dumbass \_ you already have user+detail \_ How's that again? Does that mean joe+*@csua will go to joe? \_ joe+<SMTPALLOWEDSTRING>@CSUA goes to joe@CSUA \_ Do RFCs allow a plus in the user portion of address? \_ Yes. \_ Which one? \_ RFC 822, Sec. 3.3 The localpart is word *(.word) (their notation), according to sec. 6.1 of the same. 3.1 gives word as atom or quoted-string. Atoms are strings of chars except spaces, controls, and special chars. None of these three categories includes "+", so "+" is kept as part of the atom token. The modern mail RFC, 2822, gives a similar setup in its sec. 3.2.4, where atom is explicitly 1*atext, with atext defined to include valid chars, which are (quote): ALPHA / DIGIT / ; Any character except controls, "!" / "#" / ; SP, and specials. "$" / "%" / ; Used for atoms "&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" / "/" / "=" / "?" / "^" / "_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~" ...And in all cases, it is left up to the system to interpret localpart any way it likes. Note that a lot of MTA's _will_ break on some of those characters even though the RFC doesn't make them illegal. \_ more flexible is something like virtual hosting username.domain.tld and forwarding all mail to that smtp virtualhost to username@domain.tld, letting you having spamtag@username.domain.tld. \_ qmail does this better. arbitrary hierarchies and easy processing. and hyphen looks nicer than plus. --aaron |
2002/11/10 [Uncategorized] UID:26501 Activity:nil |
11/10 Don't forget to take your Prozac aaron. |
2002/11/10-11 [Computer/SW/Mail] UID:26502 Activity:high |
11/10 In light of recent motd postings, why is pine such a bad mail agent? \_ It's a bitch to maintain, it has a huge memory footprint, it has broken locking, it's far less configurable than just about anything else you can chose, it uses pico by default which is a terrible thing to give a newbie as their first editor, it enforces bad habits, ... is that enough? \_ so in other words you're a lazy sysadmin? Yeah, I really \_ It's only a bad mail agent compared to all the other ones. \_ It doesn't embarrass paolo. wany my Doctor to be concerned about "how to use VI" in his spare time. \_ It's nothing about laziness. If your "Doctor" is going to need a mailagent, have him pop his mail off the server with his favorite application. Pine has so much wrong with it, and so much time is wasted on maintaining it, it should be a non-entity. it amazes me that it's not. \_ how do you get 'lazy sysadmin' out of 'description of shitty mail client'? the above also said *nothing* about vi or your doctor. you're an idiot. i normally don't just flat out call someone an idiot but in your case it'll do. \_ "normally don't"? not likely. \_ I'm not tom. \_ It isn't. \_ Exactly. I've been using mutt for about a year now and I'm just about to switch back. There's things pine did better without me searching through documentation and config files. Oh. pgp. Mutt handles pgp encryption better. I'm not a sysadmin so that's the only thing I've found that works better. \_ what about firing off external programs to deal with attachments or HTML mail? what about managing spam filters? \_ what does being a sysadmin have to do with anything? just because the motd has one very loud semi-sysadmin who likes mutt does not mean mutt is worth half a damn. please stop painting all sysadmins with the same stupidity brush. i know a few motd reading sysadmins for longer than your mutt using pseudo sysadmin with the loud mouth and none of them use mutt. |