| ||||||
| 2002/11/10-11 [Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:26493 Activity:high |
11/9 What are some good programs for encrypting files in WinXP? Someone
mentioned PGPdisk recently; is there anything better (cheaper, just
as strong, just as trustworthy)?
\_ gnupg on cygwin?
\_ deltree is closely related to philgp. |
| 2002/11/10-11 [Computer/SW/WWW/Browsers] UID:26494 Activity:moderate |
11/9 remember roving profiles and bookmarks in netscape?
is there something like that for mozilla? - danh
\_ Nope. But it really needs it dammit. |
| 2002/11/10 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:26495 Activity:very high |
11/9 Maybe this was answered a long time ago, but why doesn't the MOTD
displayed on the Soda website?
\_ Someone with "issues" posted some really offensive stuff about
a year ago and thus the web motd was pulled. Now there is nothing
stopping you from keeping a copy in ~/public_html so you can read
the motd via the web.
\_ what was so offensive that it banned free speech? what's the
command to use the melhalf (sp) command to view archived motd's?
(i promise to write it down this time).
\_ ~marco/bin/motdbrowse ... you may need to poke around the
files in ~mehlhaff/tmp
\_ since the motd is offensive just about every day to someone
maybe you could give a general topic? how could someone
decide which particular topic was the one?
\_ Think about something significant that happened last
year (say in sept.). And yes the motd offends people
everyday, but in this case someone was offended enough
to complain to root.
\_ and that someone happened to suck the dick of
the then CSUA president
\_ dude, blowjob beats motd every fucking time, as it
should. what kind of idiot are you? --aaron
\_ dude, blowjob beats motd every fucking time,
as it should. what kind of idiot are you? --aaron
\_ thank you. --erikred |
| 2002/11/10-11 [Computer/SW/Unix] UID:26496 Activity:moderate |
11/9 what's a unix instant messenger client that supports icons?
\_ gaim? |
| 2002/11/10 [Uncategorized] UID:26497 Activity:moderate |
11/9 Everything interesting purged from motd by anonymous censor-coward.
I see business as usual is going strong on the motd.
\_ get a life |
| 2002/11/10 [Uncategorized] UID:26498 Activity:nil |
11/9 Here a time waster for any of you stuck at work on this rainy saturday:
http://www.ericmyer.com/stereotypes.htm |
| 2002/11/10 [Uncategorized] UID:26499 Activity:nil |
11/9 Will 2002 Leonids be better than 2001?
\_ problem is it coincides with a full moon, which will overpower
many of the smaller meteor streaks. Aside from that, this year is
supposed to be better than last. |
| 2002/11/10-11 [Computer/SW/Mail, Academia/Berkeley/CSUA] UID:26500 Activity:high |
11/10 Is it possible for CSUA to automaticall forward all emails sent to
<username>.* to username? So like joe.amazon@csua would go to
username@csua.
\_ no, that would require work
\_ Dumbass
\_ you already have user+detail
\_ How's that again? Does that mean joe+*@csua will go to joe?
\_ joe+<SMTPALLOWEDSTRING>@CSUA goes to joe@CSUA
\_ Do RFCs allow a plus in the user portion of address?
\_ Yes.
\_ Which one?
\_ RFC 822, Sec. 3.3
The localpart is word *(.word) (their notation),
according to sec. 6.1 of the same. 3.1 gives
word as atom or quoted-string. Atoms are
strings of chars except spaces, controls, and
special chars. None of these three categories
includes "+", so "+" is kept as part of the
atom token. The modern mail RFC, 2822, gives
a similar setup in its sec. 3.2.4, where atom
is explicitly 1*atext, with atext defined to
include valid chars, which are (quote):
ALPHA / DIGIT / ; Any character except controls,
"!" / "#" / ; SP, and specials.
"$" / "%" / ; Used for atoms
"&" / "'" / "*" / "+" / "-" / "/" / "=" / "?" / "^" /
"_" / "`" / "{" / "|" / "}" / "~"
...And in all cases, it is left up to the
system to interpret localpart any way it likes.
Note that a lot of MTA's _will_ break on some of
those characters even though the RFC doesn't make
them illegal.
\_ more flexible is something like virtual
hosting username.domain.tld and forwarding
all mail to that smtp virtualhost to
username@domain.tld, letting you having
spamtag@username.domain.tld.
\_ qmail does this better. arbitrary hierarchies and easy
processing. and hyphen looks nicer than plus. --aaron |
| 2002/11/10 [Uncategorized] UID:26501 Activity:nil |
11/10 Don't forget to take your Prozac aaron. |
| 2002/11/10-11 [Computer/SW/Mail] UID:26502 Activity:high |
11/10 In light of recent motd postings, why is pine such a bad mail agent?
\_ It's a bitch to maintain, it has a huge memory footprint, it has
broken locking, it's far less configurable than just about anything
else you can chose, it uses pico by default which is a terrible
thing to give a newbie as their first editor, it enforces bad
habits, ... is that enough?
\_ so in other words you're a lazy sysadmin? Yeah, I really
\_ It's only a bad mail agent compared to all the other ones.
\_ It doesn't embarrass paolo.
wany my Doctor to be concerned about "how to use VI"
in his spare time.
\_ It's nothing about laziness. If your "Doctor" is going to
need a mailagent, have him pop his mail off the server with
his favorite application. Pine has so much wrong with it,
and so much time is wasted on maintaining it, it should be
a non-entity. it amazes me that it's not.
\_ how do you get 'lazy sysadmin' out of 'description of shitty
mail client'? the above also said *nothing* about vi or your
doctor. you're an idiot. i normally don't just flat out call
someone an idiot but in your case it'll do.
\_ "normally don't"? not likely.
\_ I'm not tom.
\_ It isn't.
\_ Exactly. I've been using mutt for about a year now and I'm just
about to switch back. There's things pine did better without me
searching through documentation and config files. Oh. pgp. Mutt
handles pgp encryption better. I'm not a sysadmin so that's
the only thing I've found that works better.
\_ what about firing off external programs to deal with
attachments or HTML mail? what about managing spam filters?
\_ what does being a sysadmin have to do with anything? just
because the motd has one very loud semi-sysadmin who likes
mutt does not mean mutt is worth half a damn. please stop
painting all sysadmins with the same stupidity brush. i know
a few motd reading sysadmins for longer than your mutt using
pseudo sysadmin with the loud mouth and none of them use mutt. |