|
2002/11/3 [Politics/Domestic, Politics/Domestic/SocialSecurity] UID:26389 Activity:high |
11/2 http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/20/magazine/20INEQUALITY.html Ok freepers out there, you can all start ranting about this now. \_ Why would anyone bother ranting about a NYT article? It's the NYT. Everyone knows in advance what they're going to say on any topic, so why bother? \_ and the same isn't true for the Free Republic? what's your point, anyway? |
2002/11/3-4 [Uncategorized] UID:26390 Activity:low |
11/02 What's the state of secure (i.e. encrypted) pop/imap these days? \_ Alabama I believe. YMMV. |
2002/11/3-4 [Uncategorized] UID:26391 Activity:low |
10/28 Someone posted a prepaid 2.7c/minute long distance provider. What was the url \_ http://onesuite.com is 2.5 cents/minute. http://bigzoo.com (2.9 cents/minute) is not bad either. |
2002/11/3-4 [Computer/SW/OS/Linux, Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:26392 Activity:nil |
11/2 Anyone use good OCR software for Windows or Linux? If so, please list it here. Thanks. \_ if you know any good OCR for CHinese for Linux, list here please |
2002/11/3-4 [Science/Space] UID:26393 Activity:very high |
11/3 Physics/Chem question: when I microwave water for tea (usually it gets to a superheated state w/o boiling over) I can often see an oily layer at the top. Anybody know what causes this? oktnx \_ film from soap or something left in the cup/glass? \_ You're drinking city water. \_ moron, you can't superheat water without pressurize it \_ wrong. \_ it's just the oils within the tea. \_ It's filtered tap water (no tea yet) and I never see it except when the water is very hot and not boiling. \_ Are you interested in BS speculative answers? \_ Definitely. It's a slow day. \_ Well, then, maybe it's not oil at all but a thin layer of very hot water. Alternately, maybe it IS oil, but it was oil that was sort of embedded in your teacup, and didn't float to the top until things got very hot. To test that, put tap water in, heat, pour out \_ Try it with distilled water hot water + oil, put more water in, heat, and see if the oil eventually runs out. \_ I already told you: you're drinking shitty city water. \_ Try it with distilled water vs. tap water. Also try cup vs sterilized microwave-safe glassware. Basically, use all of that science training they tried to beat into you. \_ Clean your damned turdcovered microwave. \_ yeah i am guessing the oil spatter in your \uwave floats around when you are nuking or there is oil floating around your kitchen which lands in the mug. kitch != fab lab. --psb \_ Speak for your own kitchen. *Mine* is cleaner than the best fabs IBM has. \_ dude, you are SO gay. admit it to yourself. \_ I'll let you know as soon as your cock ring stops bouncing off my teeth, loverboy. \_ Dude it's rat pee. From rats stuck in the sewage system, which is where your "drinking" water comes from anyway. You think they filter it? Ha ha, you fool. They just send it through the giant underground CIA rat pee farms and add some fluorine. -John |
2002/11/3-4 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:26394 Activity:moderate |
11/3 the town i live in votes for mayor every two years. this week we will vote on a measure to change the term length to four years. proponents say this will allow the mayor to focus on more long term issues than the next election, and opponents say that longer terms just mean more corruption. both cite other cities that have very corrupt city government with either a strong mayor or weak mayor model. what does the motd think? right now, our city government works better than most(obviously i don't live in berkeley). \_ If it ain't broke, don't fix it. But I'd think that a four year model would work better. If the mayor really sucks, you could always try and force a resignation or early elections. \_ you can never get rid of someone before their term. dont be naive. \_ I am not a crook. \_ Whatever, as if your mayor is going to send operatives into the political opposition's hotel room. Anyway, this sort of thing happens all the time now and no one gives a shit anymore. See Harkin. |
2002/11/3-4 [Politics/Domestic/California] UID:26395 Activity:insanely high |
11/3 Even though in California my vote is meaningless I still plan to vote: Yes: . No : . Already have : . \_ Practically useless, yes. Meaningless, no. \_ you can directly affect the quality of your life by voting for or against the measures on your local ballot, even in California. - danh \_ Not really. You can believe that if you want but you're just one tiny grain on a huge beach. No one will miss you. \_ Political BS aside, Bush's margin of victory came down to a few hundred Florida voters. And more locally, the 90 Berkeley mayoral race came down to 12 votes short of 50% in the main, and less than a hundred in the runoff. Sometimes one vote does matter. \_ yeah, and it's pretty predictable where that can happen. both parties knew florida was going to be close, as did the press and anyone who followed politics. i live in a state where neither party even bothered to campaign, and, as predicted, one party beat the other by tens of percentage points. my vote in that election did not count for shit, thanks to the electoral college system. \_ Please, don't vote, be my guest. The more morons like you stay out, the more my opinions will matter. \_ And you figure your opinion counts how? You're a genius! That's the very topic we're trying to discuss until you came along and simply decided it because you're so smart! \_ How is it meaningless? \_ Because this is such a heavily Democrat state there's no point in voting for anything. All the Democrats will win so why is reelected. COmpanies are fleeing this state in untold #'s bother? \_ Meaningless depends on party affiliation. I'm a democrat. \_ Damn commie. In ten years CA will be in the dumps if Davis is reelected. COmpanies are fleeing this state in untold #'s \_ So am I. So what? Your vote is still meaningless. As if your going makes a damned bit of difference. Your party has nothing to do with it. I guess if you're Green then it could matter but everyone else is wasting their time. \_ But imagine if more and more democrats started to believe that, eventually they'd start losing. \_ Yeah if like 85% of them did that, maybe. I can't imagine it. It's too silly. \_ that is why I don't particularly believed in democracy. Having said that, I would have to say in the case of United States democracy has worked pretty well. And if you accept the "democracy" which the founding fathers has envisioned, you probably would have less complaint. It was not meant for people of common at begin with, so, embrace it. \_ How to govern country? Mass executions and state security? \_ This isn't China, thanks. \_ I was making fun of the awful nonsensical English of the post I was responding to. \_ how good is your Chinese? \_ Doesn't matter. This is an American hosted computer at an American University and you're writing in what is supposed to be English. How well the poster knows or writes Chinese is about as meaningful as how long you've had herpes (sorry about that, I swear I didn't know I was shedding virus at the time). \_ Insulting someone who has a better command of two languages than you do, for not having a good enough command of the language, is rather curious. \_ Get over it, nobody gives a shit how well he speaks chinese. \_ Oh really? See above... \_ *laugh* Yes, a motd poll. That's a real good way to measure anything here. I'm *sure* the motd poll is a pure gold standard quality measurement just like voting in Broward, FL. How fucking funny you'd fall back on a motd poll for 'proof' of anything. \_ wan ba dan, gai si. \_ Get a life. |