|
2002/3/31 [Transportation/PublicTransit] UID:24272 Activity:high |
3/30 What's up with SFO BART station? Wasn't it supposed to be open back in December? \_ it was actually supposed to open in 1998, I think. \_ What's up is it's a 1.5 billion-dollar boondoggle--a torturous solution to a non-problem. If they'd just done the wise thing with an inter-modal station west of 101 hooked up to the monorail and CalTrain, it would have been half the cost and been done by now. Thank Quentin Kopp. -tom \_ Can you run more than the current 40 train schedule (about every half hour) without grade separation? If you can't expand the schedule, and have to build overpasses and underpasses, wouldn't you also run into the same issue? \_ You mean CalTrain? The CalTrain issue is orthogonal, but you could electrify it and do grade separation for the entire system for less than BART-to-SFO cost. -tom \_ I'm unfamiliar with this plan. Is this something that was considered and rejected? Is there a report somewhere that says why? \_ They wouldn't have had that tax revenue for the city for all the hotels that they expected to be built next to the BART station. I think it was Millbrae. --oj \_ Nobody wants to transfer 10 bazillion times to different buses/cars/trains just to go between SF and SFO. If *you* still want to do it go ahead, then *you* carry your luggage in the rain before going to your meeting with some COO who you hope buys your product. Oh yeah, that's right you have a job that gives you no sense of reality. \_ You'll still have to transfer to the monorail unless you're going to the international terminal. There wouldn't be any "luggage carrying in the rain" with an intermodal station--have you ever been to an airport with a monorail? And BART-to-SFO means that people coming from the south on CalTrain will have to transfer to BART at Millbrae, and then to the monorail. It's a planning disaster. -tom \_ if you have the kind of job where you're meeting with COO's, take a fucking cab and expense it. tom is not the one with no sense of reality - public transportation should designed for the common man/woman. \_ Oh my God! And THINK OF THE CHILDREN! \_ Do you believe in babies? \_ Do they vote or donate to political campaigns? |
2002/3/31 [Uncategorized] UID:24273 Activity:insanely high |
3/30 #4 Queen Mum. #5 Ed Turner. \_ How many people will it take until this AWFUL, HORRIBLE CHAIN OF DEATH reaches a CHILD??????!?!? WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN??????? \_ It takes a Village to Think of a Child. \_ Or a priest. \_ You know what they say... they always come in groups of 5,793. -geordan \_ I told you that threes stuff was bullshit. Who is Ed Turner? \_ former bigwig of CNN. hired Ted Turner (no relation). \_ How is it bullshit? Don't you know *anything* about the science behind numerology? Sheesh. |
2002/3/31 [Politics/Domestic/California, Politics/Domestic/Immigration] UID:24274 Activity:high |
3/30 Liberal - a euphemism for vote buying. http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/656420/posts \_ I object to the misuse of the word 'liberal' which traditionally has meant "open minded". If you mean Left or Democrat or Socialist or whatever, just say so. Waitress at the Oakland Zachary's with the shortish blue hair has a great set. Just thought you should know. \_ I think he means "liberal" in the political meaning. That started out as "more willing to spend money" and has lately come to mean very little. Contrast "conservative" that started out as "less willing to spend money" but now means something like "Jingoism". I can't get to Zach's anymore but the Mountain View Hobbee's has a couple lookers. \_ Then go ask her out. \_ Just because shes got doesnt mean need to ask her out. Anyways I've felt what she's got and not OP. |
2002/3/31 [Uncategorized] UID:24275 Activity:nil |
3/31 are there any movies out now that are decent? ive already been warned about time machine, and already seen lotr. \_ Blade2 for standard matinee quality vampire slaying. |
2002/3/31-4/1 [Computer/Theory] UID:24276 Activity:very high |
04/730 I forgot my calculus, please help me out. does the line integral of a function f(x,y) compute the length of the function on top of that line, or the area of the function above that line? (e.g. does the line integral of a hemisphere calculate the length of the arc above the line, or the area of the half-circle above the line?) \_ i predict that you will be much more satisfied with the responses to your question of you tell us *exactly* what the problem is. \_ I did already, look in the parens. \_ the "line integral of a hemisphere" makes no sense. one takes the line integral of a *function* along a *path*. \_ a hemisphere is a function. \_ a hemisphere is not a path. a half-circle is perhaps what you're thinking of? \_ You want a surface integral if you're integrating over a surface. \_ asking these type of questions on a sysadm infested forum will get you nowhere \_ i am not a sysadmin, and i have a math degree. it's justa badly phrased question. \_ ditto. The MOTD: Not Just For Taos Monkeys Any More (tm) \_ Isn't Taos dead? \_ Taos Never Ended |