|
2002/3/11 [Recreation/Activities] UID:24072 Activity:high |
3/9 Oregon seeded 2 and Arizona 3. Goes to show that RPI isn't looked into as much as Top 25 Rankings. \_ Oregon won the PaolO, and kicked Arizona's ass twice. For winning the tourney, UA got put in the west. \_ You are supporting my point. But UA has an RPI of 6, vs Oregon's 34. But Top25 ranking and other factors were greater factors than the RPI. \_ yermom got seeded last night too \_ Explain Gonzaga then. \_ Or Mississippi State. RPI is only one of dozens of factors. AP rankings are not one of the factors. -tom \_ This is not a troll, I'm serious. Can someone please explain this obsession with sports stats, rankings, etc? When I see stuff like this I only think, "Huh? Who cares?" -not a sports freak \_ So what are you obsessed with? Movies? TV? Music? Masturbation? There's nothing to explain. -tom \_ Nothing. I don't obsess over random statistics. I don't obsess over movie/tv people. I don't own a zillion cd/dvd's. I don't get off thinking about you. I'm not obsessed with anything. I want to know why random sports statistics hold any interest. Why do you care? Is it entertainment? Is it bragging rights at the end of the season that you were right and someone else was wrong? You just like the jersey colors? There's a lot to explain even if you personally don't have the answers. \_ So what do you live for? Like your family or something? \_ Live for? lots of things including my family but I don't obsess over my family or other things if that's what you're getting at. \_ All is empty. |
2002/3/11 [Recreation/Media] UID:24073 Activity:very high |
3/9 Star Trek Bridge Commander. Take the helm. Crush Cardasians. Beat up Ferengi. Bully your crew around. Kick dirt in Klingon faces. Very amusing. \_ Prepare to be boarded! \_ That's one thing it doesn't do. I don't think there's any sort of boarding action unless it was scripted in later in the game where I haven't played yet. There's even a simple Star Trek quality plotline. It's just like watching the show but you get to do stuff. \_ Prepare to be bored! |
2002/3/11-12 [Science/GlobalWarming] UID:24074 Activity:moderate |
3/11 When a nuke hits SF, *this* happens: http://pbs.vicinity.com/pbs/blast.hm?SEC=25pressure&AD2=&AD3=sf%2Cca&AD4=U.S.&x=40&y=16 [ this is for your amusement. it is not a troll. it is not a political statement. it has no other meaning, value, or content. if you see more to this than the mere information go seek help ] \_ yeah and so what you greenpeace beatnik throwback? Genie is out of bottle. if you don't like it, go back to scavenging for food. this is progress. man's M.O. is monopolizing scarce resources for himself \_ Bad Troll. No cookie. \_ Go home you fake peacenik. This isn't 'progress' as you pretend to claim. This is way fucking cool. Where else can you see on something on the net with a phrase like, "Ninety-eight percent of the population within this area are dead"? Sweet. Plug in your favorite city and see who dies! \_ neat or not neat, it's 50 year old technology, and all the mathematics of death associated with it was worked out and published decades ago. of course if you never read anything that's not on the net, i guess you can be impressed. \_ Dummy, it's hooked up to mapquest so you get to see the tonnage on your local area. WTF is wrong with people like you? Yes dummy I know the technology and numbers were worked out years before yermom was born. That isn't the cool part. Stupid loudmouth know nothing ignorant jerks.... \_i'm just sick of all the motd assholes who demand a reference for something, and then just ingnore you when you supply a written reference that would actually require a trip to the library. fucking stupid ass webmonkey motherfuckers. oh, yeah. go fuck yourself. \_ look genius, this has *nothing* to do with info you can get in a library. I can not get info from a library that says what'll happen if I drop a nuke on Walnut Creek, Santa Clara, Fremont, or a long list of other fun places. stop taking crack. \_ This is silly. I'd aim for the Valley, like Christopher Walken in that bond movie. Destroying MAE-WEST would be bad, right? |
2002/3/11-12 [Academia/Berkeley/UCSEE] UID:24075 Activity:nil |
3/11 Hey any interest in BroomBall? Is UCSEE or EJC or whoever still doing BroomBall? How about the CSUA organizing a BloodBath, er BroomBall? ok tnx. |
2002/3/11-12 [Computer/SW/Unix] UID:24076 Activity:kinda low |
3/11 I need to start a daemon as a specified user at startup time, or soon after, on FreeBSD. How can I do this? \- you might be able to do it with su, but if it needs to bind to a privilaged port and then relinquish priv, then it is more involved, say if you want to run named as an unpriv user, as we do. so the daemon is in fact in the details, e.g. if you are also chrooting etc. --psb \_ Actually, it's not so complicated-- ideally, it would simple enough to do with a nologin/nopass user and an rc.d script. It doesn't need any special privileges. su wouldn't really work, because it requires a shell. If I try sudo -u user daemon then sudo complains that I'm already root and don't need to sudo. \_ Are you insistent on not having a shell for "user." I don't see why su -u user -c "daemon" wouldn't work for you (assuming you allow user a shell). Or try: chsh -s "/bin/bash" user; su -u user -c "daemon"; chsh -s "/bin/false" user. And let me know if that works. \_ Do you have the source for the daemon? If so, just patch main so that it takes two additional args one for the uid/user and the other for the gid/group to switch to after starting up. If the daemon needs to bind to a port, it might be more complex, |
2002/3/11 [Computer/SW/Languages/Java] UID:24077 Activity:nil |
3/11 Java Q: Are these Perl codes possible in Java? |
2002/3/11-12 [Uncategorized] UID:24078 Activity:nil |
3/11 http://people.debian.org/~branden/official_motto.jpg |
2002/3/11-12 [Uncategorized] UID:24079 Activity:moderate |
3/11 does anyone get this riddle, I don't. "what grows up while growing down?" answer: a goose. \_ This took me a while. "down" is a term for feathers of a young bird. --PeterM \_ I thought maybe the op was trolling, badly... \_ oh that kind of down. thanks. and no trolling here. -op \_ "A tree," also seems to work since the roots grow downwards, but I think your answer is better. -emin \_ What was the answer to te "what is wrong with this picture" puzzle the other day in the MOTD? The picture with the table and chair with the screaming face? \_ nothing wrong with the picture. the gag is that you're looking so intently for a flaw that doesn't exist that the screaming face scares the living shit out of you. |
2002/3/11-12 [Uncategorized] UID:24080 Activity:nil |
3/11 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8927-2002Mar11.html Walk like an Egyptian! |
2002/3/11-12 [Computer/SW/Languages/Java] UID:24081 Activity:kinda low |
3/11 Java Q: How to do function pointers in Java? Specifically, are these Perl codes portable to Java? $hash = { 'var1' => { 'class' => 'Foo', 'fnct_ptr' => 'fooMethod', 'args' => ['a', 1, 'b'] }, 'var2' => { 'class' => 'Bar', 'fnct_ptr' => 'barMethod', 'args' => {'arg1' => 'hello', 'arg2' => 'John'} } }; sub process { $type = shift; my $class = $hash->{$type}{'class'}; my $fnct_ptr = $hash->{$type}{'fnct_ptr'}; my $args = $hash->{$type}{'args'}; return $class->$fnct_ptr($args); } I know I can do something like Class myClass = Class.forname($classname); for the class and either pass in a vector or hash for the args. However, I have not been able to figure how to do the function pointer concept. Any suggestions and/or pointers would be greatly appreciated. \_ Java explicitly forbids direct function pointers b/c of its security policies. You can kind of do it with interfaces (define interface FooInterface with methods foo_1 ... foo_n; then implement the interface in FooClass; foo = new FooClass(); and pass foo (the object) to whatever needs to run foo (the method). \_ Assuming security policies are set to allow it, you can do function pointer-like things using the java reflection API. |
2002/3/11-12 [Politics/Foreign/MiddleEast/Others] UID:24082 Activity:insanely high |
3/11 Please recommend a first-time 7 day tour of Egypt. We are independent minded travellers but want to take advantage of the discount a tour package would offer as well as the convenience for someone who have not been to Egypt before. We will depart from Europe. Ok tnx. \_ risking your life there eh? you are nuts to travel in middleeast \_ It's not like Egypt and Israel have actually declared open war on each other yet. That'll probably take a few months. Like if the Israeli's do some brutal pounding in Gaza and a few hundred thousand flee south to Egypt. God knows the Egyptians don't have any use for the Palestinians. Who wants that coming over their border? \_ Search google using: egypt tourist kill It's the anti-Egyptian-govt forces that'll kill you If anything, Egypt govt is pro-israel. \_ It was all way back in 1997! It's safe now! Really! Come back to Jamai-- I mean Egypt, your new isla-- desert home! \_ it was also a suspected al-queda-sponsored attack [formatd] \_ Egypt? Pro-Israeli government? You're nuts. Try reading any of the Egyptian newspapers which are all government controlled mouth pieces. You'd think they were in the middle of a hot war the way they talk about Israel. With friends like that.... Anyway, definitely not a great place to tour these days if you value your life. \_ Egypt is safer than most US cities. Email if you want some \_ Cairo is safer than most US cities. Email if you want some advice from someone who has visited there. -ausman \_ when was the last time you visited? A friend of mine got into a rough spot earlier this year. \_ End of 2000. I had to chase some leering men away from a female traveling companion at one point, but it did not seem particularly dangerous to me. She might have felt differently about it. Egypt has very defined gender roles, which is what I wanted to talk to the op about. -ausman \_ very defined gender roles = need to chase leering men away from female tourists? uh say what? |
2002/3/11-12 [Uncategorized] UID:24083 Activity:nil 66%like:36272 |
3/11 restored, as usual. |
4/14 |