1/13 http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/13/edlife/13BAND.html?pagewanted=print
The article mentions 'Direct Connect.' What other file sharing
programs are in use these days besides this and Morpheus and other
FastTrack variants. Any CSUA members in the dorms or otherwise with big
pipes care to comment?
\_ irc
\_ yeah, I've got a big pipe for ya
\_ http://vadim.berkeley.edu
\_ hi paolo!
\_ nice going vadim, taking scheme.xcf.berkeley and changing it to
vadim.berkeley. fucking tactless egomaniac.
\_ I thought the useless xcf was shut down years ago? -alum
\_ It was. It has become... the Vadim Computing
Facility.
\_ This is probably funny but I don't know who Vadim is
or the current xcf situation. Is it dead or what?
\_ Not dead. There's one member.
\_ Just using your powers of deduction, see if you
can infer what that one member's name is.
\_ check http://zeropaid.com for an extensive listing of file sharing
prorams. -- jj
\_ the Dec207 warez club!
\_ The dorms don't have a big pipe anymore. They're collectively
limited to ~20Mbit. That's 4,000+ hosts. UCB dorm net is pretty
much useless these days. Residents keep trying to get DSL
installed because it's faster.
\_ Buncha whiners. I felt lucky to have 14.4 access after I got
access to the staff/professor modem bank and off the busy and
broken 1200-9600 student bank. Doing classwork on campus was
better anyway. Easily block remote connections to your
workstation and keep all those other pesky students dialing in
at 2400 on some other machine.
\_ in my day, we used smoke signals. on a clear day with a
small enough wind we could get ten bits per minutes, and
we were damn pleased with that.
\_ They allowed you to have smoke? And you knew what the sun
looked like? And wind? You had wind?? You must be new
around here....
\_ Petition them to increase the size of the big pipe. This is
not 1991 anymore, when I spent big bucks to upgrade to a 9600
modem.
\_ The problem with the dorms is that they'll use (for napster
clones, mostly) all the bandwidth you'll give them, and the
campus pays for bandwidth used to the commodity net. Dorm
traffic isn't limited if it goes over Internet 2. -tom
\_ Cool. Now they just need a multi-campus I2 p2p thing
going and they're set. I've got this idea for a business
model... I just need $325m in funding now....
\_ Two words: traffic shaping. Eliminate this bandwidth
cap bullshit, and use traffic shaping to limit obscene
traffic caused by p2p filesharing apps. Dorm net
becomes useable again.
\_ A few more words: apathy, money, unimportant. It
isn't worth anyone's time to fix the dorm net
situation. Who cares? Let them eat cake! Is
there a minimum bandwidth promised or an SLA in
the current dorm contract? Do people *really*
choose the dorms because they have net? Was the
<DEAD>dorm.net<DEAD> the deciding factor for anyone's living
arrangement? If so they need to get over it.
\_ Clearly, that's the way campus wants to go, but
it's rather difficult in our environment. -tom
\_ that's 20Mbit to off campus. |