|
2001/6/23 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:21606 Activity:very high |
6/22 John Woo doing TMNT! http://scifi.ign.com/comics/7000.html \_ Face/Off and MI2 both sucked raw sewage. John Woo is on thin ice for me. \_ Face/Off and MI2 both rocked. Sure, they weren't anything like Harboiled, Hard Target, or Broken Arrow, but hey, they were entertaining and over the top, and that's why I go to see John Woo films. If JW's doing TMNT, he's got my $8. --erikred \_ They are going back to the "grittier" comics. This is going to suck. I liked the cartoons more, the turtle van, Rockstead and we (and yes, it's a we) have come up with the people who are actually posting to the motd; enough so that we can BeeBop, the evil aliens, etc. poster's login. soon to come: /etc/motd.authenticated! \_ BeeBop? Is that like a BeeBoy? \_ Jaysis, yer a cunt. \_ paolo is that you? \_ No I worte this. I liked the cartoons much more \_ wow. that really sucks ass. Now the motd is going to be boring and lame. This is going to kill the best part of motd. Everything changes, I guess, and not always for the better. -mice \_ I am unable to parse this post. "ya know what we have come up with the people who are posting; enough so that we can write a script..." huh? than the comic books (I had original copies of 1-32 when I was in HS). The only one I liked was the one where they go to china, I think it was #18. ----ranga \_ no. i have the balls to sign my posts. Ya know what? We (and yes, it's a we) have come up with a way to id the people who are actually posting to the motd - so we can write a script that will annotate each post with the poster's login. Soon to come: /etc/motd.authenticated! - paolo \_ R.I.P. MOTD --mice \_ This is really missing the point of the motd. Except for people who censor and delete, why do you care who did what to the motd? \_ This is a terrible idea that will ruin the motd. \_ who's we? Anyways, it seems like the tool would be more useful if it were not widely released to sodans, but rather accessible by a limited cabal of users. \_ The cabal already have an id method. This new script is being developed by us for use by everyone else. \_ Weren't you the one aruging for unrestricted and possibly anonymous posting on the motd just a few days ago? \_ I think I've seen both TMNT movies the first week they were released and liked them pretty much. |
2001/6/23 [Recreation/Dating] UID:21607 Activity:moderate |
6/22 Are you intimidated by a significant other who is smarter or has more education than you? will you date someone smarter or has more education or is more accomplished than you? \_ I'm unlikely to find a chick smarter than me. But if I do find one, and she's funny, and we make good conversation, it would be cool. \_ just the kind of attitude I was expecting from this group. or at least from some of the motd responses. \_ pussy is as pussy does. why would it matter? we're all college educated. if she wins the nobel prize then good for us, more money for me. \_ if she's truly smart, she would go out with me and only me babaay \_ Save your money, save your life, save your future. Do not date women. They are evil and will suck the very life from you. \_ Are you saying all men should be gay? This reminds me, I just saw 'Keep the River on Your Right' tonight. I thought it was a great movie. Anyone else like it? \_ Women do that all the time. But they often won't respect a man who is less intelligent or wealthy than them. \_ Women date up. Men date down. It all works out. \_ that kind of attitude means that the dynamic will never change for the better. =( \_ What makes you say this 'dynamic' needs to change for the better, or indeed that a better 'dynamic' exists? Maybe this state of affairs is optimal. \_ i used to only date geeks who were as smart or smarter than me. then i figured out that even though it sounds like a good idea in theory, two very smart geeks in a relationship isn't necessarily a good thing. now i'm in a great relationship with a non-geek who's reasonably intelligent but not brilliant. -chick who's "dating down" \_ My very smart friend with a Stanford engineering masters and high tech industry management experience not to mention a rich parents married a Berkeley dude with education degree who is a school teacher. I always say Berkeley guys are the coolest. I just met two more pretty Stanford babes married to Berkeley geeks, and another pretty one who digs me. \_ spareH074ZNCH1Xp? |
2001/6/23 [Computer/SW/Languages/Perl] UID:21608 Activity:high |
6/22 Is there a utility that helps you decode a hex dump? I want a tool that lets you enter each field and the size of each field. Then it takes in an ASCII hex dump and then decodes it according to the field information. I'm getting a headache reading all these hex dumps. Thanks. \_ perl is your friend. \_ Perl is the jism of satan. \_ is that a bad thing? \_ I didn't know Saddam Hussein had a csua account. \_ Get off my dick. \_ I'm the hot gay dragon. \_ What kind of a Marine are you??? \_ indeed. try "perldoc -f pack" \_ scanf("%x", ...)? \_ listen guys, I do not want to write any code to do this. I'm looking for an application already written. Free or shareware would be nice. thanks. \_ An application to do this would require you to specify the format of your particular dump in some kind of detailed manner. Jeez, just write the 5 or 10 lines of code it will take. \- possibly emacs hexl-mode --psb \_ what platform? if Windows, frhed will let you do something like this, although it's a bit limited (byte/short/int/long/float/double fields only; can't specify bit-fields, can't specify arrays, etc.) \_ exactly. you could specify a text file with type/size information with each field, etc. ok, making a custom program to do it wouldn't be hard, but an already-existing, general program would be still be easier. |
2001/6/23 [Computer/SW/Database] UID:21609 Activity:high |
6/22 I have a select() and read() question. I'm using select() in order to figure out whether or not a given socket fd has anything to read within the timeout. If the socket doesn't have anything to read, then I close the connection, as I'm trying to prevent a dos connection attack. Now my problem is this: if select() returns a given socket fd I try to read from it, read() will block if there are less than the specified number of bytes available on the socket, which is bad because someone can still do a connection based dos. What's the standard way of dealing with this problem? Threads? Alarm timers? \_ the solution is to make the fd O_NONBLOCK using ioctl() after you open the fd. subsequent reads will not block if there isn't enough data. instead, they read as much as is available and return it. -ali \_ Thanks. I'll try it out. |