|
2001/2/22 [Uncategorized] UID:20642 Activity:nil |
2/21 What's hoserchat and why are so many CSUAers using it? \_ run ~brg/bin/hoserchat and you'll see. |
2001/2/22 [Science/Battery] UID:20643 Activity:nil |
2/21 Someone must have wanted to do this before me: I'm going on a week long backpacking trip. I want to take my digital video camera with me and do a lot of filming. I could buy a BUNCH of batteries but i'd prefer to bring along my charger and rig some sort of a micro-generator. (something lighter than a car battery). Ideas? \_ Blair Witch 3? \_ hrmm... I think I've seen like Brookstone or Skymall or something have hand-powered battery rechargers for everything from rechargeable niCad AA batts to most cell phone types. I've also seen crank type generators for flashlights at sharper image if you want to do some rewiring. \_ Will professional battery packs sold e.g. at http://bhphoto.com solve ypur problem? \_ http://www.bhphotovideo.com -brain \_ Any solar rechargers? |
2001/2/22 [Computer/SW/Security] UID:20644 Activity:nil |
2/21 Using Fsecure's (ssh v2.0.13) i attempted to do a vary large scp -r wich began fine and copied about 223 megs of files before it hung and is not doing anything. On two other machines i got about 13 (of a planned 70) megs worth of files transferred before it stopped and hung there. Has anyone experienced anything like this? What is going on? What should I do? \_ Use OpenSSH. I copy gigs (cd images) with it and have had no problem. \_ thanks, but i already had an rsync binary for these systems and i just popped that on there and ran it over ssh and all was well. |
2001/2/22 [Computer/SW/Editors/Emacs] UID:20645 Activity:nil |
2/21 Why does it seem to me that all text files that come to me from emacs users use spaces in place of tabs in many places. This is really annoying. Does emacs replace spaces with tabs or what? -vim user \_ You can fix it with "unexpand -a". \_ this can be toggled on or off. personally I prefer spaces to tabs, especially in multi-user environments where people use different tab settings. \_ Like the motd? |
2001/2/22 [Computer/SW/Security] UID:20646 Activity:nil |
2/20 How come we are still running OpenSSH 2.3.0? Shouldn't we upgrade to the newer 2.5.1? Also I've read up on that IDEA cypher that tom keeps asking for, it turns out that IDEA is deliberately ommited from OpenSSh because there is a big security whole associated with it. I'm not sure why he wants it anyway, as the other supported methods are much better. \_ Let me try to explain this one more time. We have a choice of using a server which will support whatever client one of our users is using, with whatever configuration they want to use. Or we can use OpenSSH. No one has put forth a reason why OpenSSH is even theoretically better. So why are we running it? -tom \_ Because it's open and open is kewl. Ride bike! \_ OpenSSH is as good as FSecure in terms of protocol support and because its auditing practices are like OpenBSD it is proactively secure. Who knows what buffer overflows are in the commerical closed source alternatives. Besides, Tatu is a much more immature punk than Theo de Raat. \_ OpenSSH is absolutely not as good as FSecure in terms of protocol support. OpenSSH does not support session re-keying, which is a required part of the ssh2 protocol. The ssh server from http://www.ssh.com also supports this, and is, of course, open source. -tom \_ Okay explain to me why you need session re-keying. And Tatu's ssh from http://ssh.com may be "open source", but there are serious restrictions on who can and cannot use it. OpenSSH has no restrictions. \_ I need session re-keying because IT IS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PROTOCOL and therefore PROPERLY-FUNCTIONING SSH2 CLIENTS DO NOT WORK WHEN CONNECTED TO OPENSSH SERVERS. How many times does this need to be explained? -tom \_ Whatever. What is re-keying anyway? What does it do and why is it needed by the protocol? I mean SSH v2 seems to work find without it when using OpenSSH. Are you just being ANAL again? \_ Leave your ssh2 client idle for an hour or so when connected to an openssh server. It will freeze eventually and that makes SSH2 protocol support in OpenSSH useless for people who need it. \_ The fact that openssh does not support rekeying made its ssh2 protocol support nearly useless. Has this been fixed in 2.5.1? \_ Just short by one feature. No big deal. \_ This is a big deal for sites that need a working ssh2 protocol support \_ soda doesn't need ssh2. \_ fsecure ssh 2.3 and earlier have a flaw in their HMAC code. this is documented along with the openssh lack of rekeying: http://www.openssh.com/faq.html#2.3 --jon. |
2001/2/22-23 [Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:20647 Activity:insanely high |
2/22 Come on. How hard could it be for some X savy Gnome lover out there to script up a "minimize all"? It was the best think about windows 98 and after 3 years i can't find it for my linux box (i've searched a little but not a huge amount so point the way if i just missed it). \_ use win98 then, foo. \_ Serves you right for using a shitty window manager with a shitty OS. Personally, I use TWM or a toned down afterstep. GUIs are for little boys. \_ TWM is not a GUI? \_ Yes! A fellow twm user! \_ who besides programmers and sysadmins do you really think uses a command line interface anymore? \_ People who want to get work done and not play with themselves all day changing "themes"? Oh wait, you're a linux user, \_ he said as much. right? \_ he said as much: "my linSUX box" work where you do -Sys. Admin. \_ hey Dummy, "He" wasn't The Original Poster. (and i knew this thread was likely to jump-start the then fresh motd, but this is more than i had hoped for) -TOP \_ programmers know how to use a command line? Boy I'd like to work where you do -Sys. Admin. (TOP2) \_ i wasn't trying to make some coder v.s. sysadmin point, i am neither. I use NT because the comercial software that does what I need that is easy to use is written for nt. I think most artists and writers use macos, and most non-computer related engineers use NT, \_ Uh, no. As an electrical engineer and ASIC designer, you don't use NT. All useful CAD tools are written either for Solaris or HPUX (and in some cases Linux). You won't find Synopshit or Cadence tools for NT (at least none worth using). As for advanced civil, aerospace, geological, or automotive engineering they rely on IRIX machines to do any relevant work. Lets see you do complex fluid dynamics simulation on your NT box. Only E28 AutoCAD weenies use NT. and you're average home user is on 98 or 2000. I'm not saying this a s a holy war starter, just an observation. all 99% of users out in userland care about is ease of use, number of useful software products, and convenience for getting on the web, and that's it! \_ Not sure what software you are talking about, but I find NT to be a POS for anything remotely network related. No inetd, no named, a shitty web/ftp server, crappy userland (MKS and UWIN and CygWin suck), no rcp, ssh barely works, no nfs, no appleshare, crappy browsers, broken ping and traceroute, shitty version of telnet, crappy kernel threads. I could go on, but you probably don't care because you can get 30 FPS in Q3A in NT and that's all you care about in word workds? I really am curious. an OS. Even LinSUX is better than NT. \_ look. try to imagine that you are a mechanical engineer who designes jet ingines for boeing or something. All you need to do is use AutoCAD to make drawings and matlab to do simulations and calculations. that's all. anything else you do at work is either offline, like talking to co-workers and doing pencil and paper calculations or is essentially time-wasting, like surfing the web or fiddling wiht your screensaver. why do you care what OS is running autoCAd and matlab, as long as they work? or tell me whay a writer who never typesets anything but text, and makes regular backups to zip, cd and hardcopy from word which she runs on macOS gives a damn as long as viewed with lynx. word works? I really am curious. \_ I stuided ME, so don't give me this shit. My dad has been a practicing ME (with a PE) for 30+ yrs and designed stuff for the Space Shuttle. They totally care what OS they are running. Try doing a complex Finite Element analysis or stress anaylsis on a WinNT box (even a 4 way Xenon) and you will be sitting there all week praying that it doesn't crash half way through. You need a real computer with a real OS to do this sort of work. Prefered OS are Solaris and IRIX on Origin 2ks. The same is true of almost any kind of numerical analysis that MatLab is used for. I worked on airframes for SST prototypes and no NT machine could crunch our data in MatLab within a acceptable period of time (two days) and an acceptable level of accuracy (it screws up on x86, but not on Sparc or MIPS). BTW, I've also written books and you are right about MacOS. I wouldn't use anything else for writing (I tried Windows and LinSUX). I like MacOS, I can open up a few SSH terms and work on REAL computers, whilst retaining a reasonably friendly GUI environment. Windows can't even do that. \_ OK, ME was a bad example, and i hereby admit to talking out of my ass about what a mechanical engineer actually uses in aerospace, but I think the point still holds for a large number of profesions. for *any* profession, you care about what is available to do your job, not os holy wars. if the best hardware platform for you simulations were a cluster of apple IIgs's networked with OS/2, I claim that's what you would use, even if you hate IBM and apple and have some silly quarel with the individual programmers involved in writing the os. as far as i can tell, most of the linux vs *bsd vs solaris dispute is a matter of issues that are largely personal. \_ for most people who run it at home, its a matter of taste. I prefer *BSD and Solaris because they seem "professional". LinSUX still seems like a toy. \_ sun almost everyone is cli. Used to work at cisco, it was 75% there. \_ I love it when sys admins get a fat head and start acting superior. It's really cute. Maybe you should research the companies or positions you're interested in before applying, bonehead. \_ I've found most coders know how to use a command line just enough to cause themselves trouble. I prefer my current job where the coders don't pretend to know anything outside their c/c++/java/whatever. The smartest people are the ones who know their limits. --not the same sysadmin as above \_ Hmm. Maybe I'm very fortunate then -- most of coders I work with are pretty command-line savvy. <shrug> \_ You are a dumbass. My porn and my stock charts look crappy when viewed with lynx. -TOP \_ But dude, there's all sorts of kewl ascii porn out there and the stocks are just numbers and symbols. WTF is wrong with lynx for that? You need a gui to see your stocks drop? \_ soda [~] % locate squick.vt /home/digital/ari/squick.vt.gz /home/digital/coganman/pub/squick.vt.gz /home/sequent/payam/squick.vt /home/sequent/runes/squick.vt \_ Minimize all is a major factor for you? Dude. You suck. \_ So when another OS or GUI has it, it isn't an important feature but when your religion has a feature someone else doesn't have, then it's a critical issue? RIDE BIKE! USE LINUX! KNOW GNOME! \_ GROW UP! \_ That's my point idiot. Being religiously dependant on such stupid crap is...well...stupid. You suck even more for making it a religious issue. |
2001/2/22-23 [Politics] UID:20648 Activity:kinda low |
2/22 Spring cleaning!!! \_ i thought spring's not until march 20. \_ fascist bastard. - Rik \_ It's not fascism, it's the magic of the market. |
2001/2/22-23 [Reference/Religion] UID:20649 Activity:moderate |
2/22 http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan I'm speechless. Just...speechless. \_ I dunno what to say except... why hasn't Darwinism eliminated such people yet?!? \_ the more I read the less I could believe it... \_ Brrrr. \_ How many kids do you think this guy has molested? \_ Did you see the counter at the bottom of the peter-pan site? over 240,000 people have seen that man's face. That's about a quarter million; just reading about THAT guy. wow. What a fruitcake. I think he needs a guinea worm. http://www.angelfire.com/ms/guineaworm/index.html |
2001/2/22-23 [Computer/SW/Unix] UID:20650 Activity:high |
2/22 Is there any advantage of tcsh over bash? I've always used tcsh for my shell and sh for programming. I'm wondering if tcsh has anything (other than automatically setting $REMOTEHOST) that bash doesn't. \_ one thing I like about tcsh that bash doesn't have is you can hit ^D on an attempted file complete, and it will list possible completions. Pretty useful if you dont remember the exact file name and dont want to have to abort and retype a commandline just to do a 'ls'. (well this isn't a default bash option, it may exist, I just find it easier to 'exec tcsh' than 'man bash') -ERic \_ in bash, you hit tab twice. $ ls foo^I^I[expansion list returned] but you can get this particular interface in tcsh as well. I imagine it's a holdover from csh filec. --jon \_ If you put "set show-all-if-ambiguous on" in .inputrc you will need to hit tab only once in most cases. \_ tcsh has a convenient %~ option for the prompt. Does bash have a similarly simple counterpart? \_ what does the '%~' option do? \_ it prints your current working directory with respect to your home directory (e.g.: ~user/somedir). man tcsh \_ Of course bash can do silly things like that. You can put about anything in your prompt. man bash \_ I did man bash and didn't see anything about this. Is there way to do it that is as simple as in tcsh? And as far as "silly things" goes, realistically, I think that as far as important (ie, "non-silly") features go, bash/tcsh/ksh are about the same, so it's the little things that make the difference. \_ PS1="\u@\h:\w\\$ " \_ this only works for directories off of your own home dir, not off of other users'. \_ okay. I use ksh, I'd use bourne shell if I could hack in filec and arrow keys for history. This sort of stuff is frivolous. \_ Use zsh. The best of both worlds. (In fact, all most all of both worlds) \_ /sbin/sh is the STANDARD shell! Real men know how to type and don't need fancy line editing. Use Bourne Shell as God and Steve Steve intended. Though Korn Shell is the spawn of the Devil and David Korn, its use can be tolerated on systems with clueless admins who think that /bin/csh (Bill must have been intoxicated or stoned when he wrote this) is the best thing since DECNET and LAT came out. \_ LAT! LAT is the STANDARD protocol! |
2001/2/22-23 [Uncategorized] UID:20651 Activity:low |
2/22 So, what's this wall thing? \_ Do a "wall y" at your prompt to find out. \_ not many new users use wall. it has been depricated. |
2001/2/22-23 [Computer/HW/Display, Computer/SW/OS/OsX] UID:20652 Activity:moderate |
2/22 Go watch the streaming video presentation of GeForce3 / Doom3. You'll be impressed (oh wait, this is the CSUA i'm talking to here... n/m) \_ For only $600 too. Why bother paying rent when you can get a GeForce3. \_ I'm still waiting for nVida to release the mac rom flasher for the 2MX card. I'm stuck with a Rage 128 Pro (?) and I really want a card with better 2D. Raedon is waaaay to expensive and the performance is not that much beter than the 128. The 2MX seems like a great card: low price plus good 2D. \_ 2d? Any card can do 2d perfectly fine today. 2d is a done deal. No one buys a new video card for 2d. Any video card built in the last 18 months has 2d performance way beyond anything you'll ever need. \_ Actually the Rage 128 Pro is pretty bad at 2D. It has a lot of visual artifacts that are simply annoying. The 2MX is *much* better. I'm unhappy with the 128 because ATI's XClaim 3D VR Plus didn't have these problems. I was thinking about a Voodoo3, but 3DFX died. Oh well. - still waiting for a 2MX. \_ A year after release it'll be $125 and headed into the "value oriented customer" bin for you cheapos. Doom 3 with be on one of those $2 CD's at the "old news/impulse buy" software section at the check out line at Fry's. The MX2 card I have now would have blown your shoes, shocks, and pants right off only 2 years ago. Today it's a $99 card. It's all just a penis thing. \_ No, it's all just an evolution of technology thing \_ A $600 game card is a penis thing. \_ don't mistaken value oriented with "cheapos". If you don't care about paying too much for something's real worth that only makes you an idiot. \_ Value oriented = cheapos. It's a market definition. I didn't make it up. Go read Intel or anyone else's maps for their future lineup. "Value Oriented" is always the bottom end system suitable for maybe running tetris. This is known as a "euphemism". As a Berkeley student or alum, you should know all about using nice sounding words to make lesser people feel better. You're not cheap. You're a Value Oriented customer. BTW, can I still use the word, "oriented" without offending the Asian-Americans that read the motd? \_ Value oriented != cheapos. Some people just don't need 64MB of VRAM. I don't play many games, and the ones that I do play (old LucasArts games, super puzzle fighter, Gran Turismo) don't require a $600 video card. The 8 MB Rage 128 that I have does just fine. Most of the time I have a browser and a couple of terminals open. That is all I need to do my work (writing protocols and such). Occasionally I need to use Word. The browser, word, terminals look fine even with 4 MB of video ram. I just don't need to spend $600 for "top of the line". There are a lot of people like me. \_ Yeah, and thank god I'm not one of them. You guys a are lame and boring. \_ You are posting this from work because people like me wrote the routing and switching protocols that let your crappy little PEECEE participate on the internet. Its comments like this that make some people wonder if we should just keep all the packets to ourselves. \_ Yeah. They should have the OS automatically mark the "This computer has a bad ass graphics card" flag in every IP packet it sends out so that the routers can automatically adjust the QoS of traffic originating from no-life gamers. \_ Well, you've got to use the TOS bits for something. ;-) (And in case you didn't get it, I was joking about keeping packets to myself). \_ urlP \_ There are a couple of links on http://xlr8yourmac.com. |
3/15 |