|
2000/10/13 [Academia/GradSchool, Industry/Jobs] UID:19468 Activity:nil |
10.13 http://www.rackspace.com/goconfigure/recommended/server_freebsd.php \_ Why post this? I wouldn't recommend rackspace as a colo --oj |
2000/10/13 [Uncategorized] UID:19469 Activity:nil |
10.13 http://www.vaio.sony.co.jp/QR |
2000/10/13 [Uncategorized] UID:19470 Activity:nil |
10/13 aaron and ali are cool, they are cruising the labs looking for chicks |
2000/10/13-15 [Reference/Religion] UID:19471 Activity:very high |
10/13 Does the term Arab apply to all the middle eastern people? Or is it more specific or more generic than that? Does it imply religion (e.g. Muslim) in which case includes most of the middle eastern countries EXCEPT Israel? \_ arab is not synonymous with middle eastern. nope, not at all. many countries which aren't in the middle east have substantial arab populations, such as much of northern africa. it has nothing to do with religion-- there are muslim arabs, christian arabs, jewish arabs, atheist arabs, whatever. i think irani people don't consider themselves arab, or something like that. \_ You're mostly right. Most Iranians (not Irani, but who cares?) consider themselves "Persians", but there are also Iranian Arabs. Mostly from the south, where the oil is. There is tension between Persian and Arab Iranians. House of Kabab is owned by an Arab Iranian, but he considers himself Arab first. Arabs usually speak Arabic, so that's an easy way to tell. Afghans and Iranians don't speak Arabic (as their first tongue), and they don't consider themselves Arabs. \_ As far as I'm concerned, Israelis == Arabs. But I'm a stupid 'Merican so hey. \_ yah they are all just a binch of camel jockey sand niggers anyway right? Fucking idiot. \_ Cool it jewboy. It's just some Hatfields + McCoys shit. and the way all them nationalistic fundamentalists act, man, it's more like "sand _honkeys._" Israelis == Arabs == Bible-beatin' Southerners. troll troll troll troll! \_ hey look at the cute little oriental girl! \_ Ali AlabedAlafaelMohammedAhalaha Rahimi, you wanna answer this? \_ what about the Iraqians? \_ What about them? Shitheads lead by So-dam Insane. Arab (n): An Arabic-speaking gentile-ass who lives in Arabia or \_ so what about the Iranis or the Saudians? How they differ from Israelians? More moderate than the Jordani? \_ Sorry to inject reality into this discussion, but: Arab (n): An Arabic-speaking person who lives in Arabia or North Africa (Therefore not Israeli). -tom \_ As usual, you are an idiot. Tell the Syrians and Iraqis that they are not Arabs for me. \_ changing "person" to "jewass" or "gentile-ass" is juvenile and boring. -tom \_ defining Arab, as if it needed defining, is juvenile and boring. The song "Ha" is Juvenile and boring. But "gentile-ass", while juvenile, is not boring. ha! \_ They are not Arabs, they are camel jockeys or sand n*grs (whichever racial slur you prefer) \_ Regardless nationalistic fundamentalists are the same the world over, they freakin' SUCK ASS. \_ muslims are not synonmous with arab btw \_ E.g. Malaysia and Indonesia are Islamic SE Asian countries. \_ note how there are no muslim 1st world countries. wonder if it's mutually exclusive \_ Note that there are no Indian 1st world countries. wonder if it's mutually exclusive \_ To build a 1st world nation requires intelligence, rationality, tolerance, humanity etc. These attributes are completely orthogonal to the muslim nature. \_ What about the era of Persia? It was more "1st world" than Europe at that time. \_ They were Persians, not (as you might say), dirty Arabs. \_ yeah, before Islam took over and ruined it \_ What about it? Alexander the Great conqured Persia, and then the Romans and later on the Russians. Face it, the height of Muslim glory came during Akbar's reign in India. Even then, he entrusted the daily affairs of empire to a Hindu, because he felt (and stated in writing) that no muslim could ever posses the requisite intelligence to run an empire. \_ Your lack of historical knowledge is disturbing. The Arab empires during the "Dark Ages" in Europe were larger, more civilized, and longer lasting than any Christian empire. \_ Perhaps in the years between the fall of the eastern empire and the beginning of the renasiance arab nations were better organized than european ones, but only marginally so. Even during the height of thier power, muslim rulers outside of india ran countries in which \_ Does this qualifier makes any difference? the average citizen was quite poor and had little freedom. They can hardly be considered 1st world as superior civilizations existed in non-muslim dominated parts of the the world at the same time. \_ Alexander never conquered Russia and such country did not even exist yet. A collection of feudal city states that later united as Kievan Rus' more or less has been paying off the Mongols to leave them alone for 300 years but as the Kievan Rus' government seat was in Kiev, you could just as well argue that it was actually the ancient Ukraine. There was neither Moscow (only 850 years old) nor St.Petersbourgh (negligiable age). Few of those cities are now in Russia, but they were never a capital of any country by such name. What I believe to be the oldest of the bunch, called Novgorod was actually a democracy. (strangely, it means "new town", not to be confused with my hometown Nizniy Novgorod ( "lower new town" ) that was build later than this, but still before Moscow. Could you have ment Genghis Khan? The Mongols weren't much of conquerers, because they never could live in a town for more than a couple of days, but \_ "a couple of days" is enough time to wrap you in blankets as stomp on it with horses as a token of honor. they obviously didn't lose any time. Slavs are supposed to be blond. All it really took to kicking them out was to stop mutual backstabbing that's all. -muchandr \_ One day an old polish jew, living in Warsaw, has his last light bulb burn out. To get a new one he'll have to stand in line for two hours at the store (and they'll probably be out by the time he gets there), so he goes up to his attic and starts rummaging around for an old oil lamp he vaguely remembers seeing. He finds the old brass lamp in the bottom of a trunk that has seen better days. He starts to polish it and (poof!) a genie appears in cloud of smoke. "Hoho, Mortal!" says the genie, stretching and yawning, "For releasing me I will grant you three wishes." The old man thinks for a moment, and says, "I want Genghis Khan resurrected. I want him to re-unite his mongol hordes, march to the Polish border, and then decide he doesn't want the place and march back home." "No sooner said than done!" thunders the genie. "Your second wish?" "Ok. I want Genghis Khan resurrected. I want him to re-unite his mongol hordes, march to the Polish border, and then decide he doesn't want the place and march back home." "Hmmm. Well, all right. Your third wish?" "I want Genghis Khan resurrected. I want him to re-unite his--" "OK OK OK. Right. What's this business about Genghis Khan marching to Poland and turning around again?" The old man smiles. "He has to pass through Russia six times." \_ Every who lives in the Middle East is Middle Eastern, but Arabs and Israelis are Semitic and Persians are not. The former two could never find any chemical / biological warfare agets that worked on one but not the other, and not for the lack of trying... -muchandr \_ John, I forgot I owed you an explanation on Czechs. The Czech design bureau is Tatra (they did do trucks, but are not Russian), the firm who hired them was the new Bugatti under Romano Artioli, and yes, correct again, they are currently buiding 18 cilinder monsters under Bugatti label for VW AG, whose Ferdinand Piech, by the weirdest fluke is the designer of Audi Quattro yet majority shareholder of Porshe and direct descendant of Ferry Porshe. Porshe had to finally part ways with the aircoled boxer 6 in 911, which was getting too hot and too noisy at three something liters displacement and switch to watercooling like the rest of the wold, so imagine their surprise when they found out that the Czech government Tatra limosines, that were absolutely silent is actually an aircooled 8 of some 4 or 5 liter displacement. That was probably the largest modern aircooled car engine. Very impressive. EB110 supercar was theirs, and the new ones you can find at http://www.bugatti-cars.de I don't think VW would've dared a crack at Bugatti themselves. They were already scared shitless of having to do Bentleys and Lamborginis ... -muchandr |
2000/10/13-14 [Uncategorized] UID:19472 Activity:nil |
10/13 Stevens died? When was this?? \_ Rich Stevens? Just over a year ago: http://www.usenix.com/directory/awards.html |
2000/10/13-14 [Reference/Religion] UID:19473 Activity:insanely high |
10/13 What is wrong with those arabs? Bombing American vessels, killing Israeli soldiers, etc. Do they want to get nuked or what? \_ enough of this racist bickering. it hurts you know. if you want to know the two sides, please see-- arab point of view: http://www.middleeast.org israeli point of view: http://www.jpost.com \_ What is wrong with those Israelis? Opressing Palestinians, killing children for throwing rocks, etc. What is wrong with our government that sends my tax dollars to them every year? \_ The Israelis did not start the fighting. The criminal \_ Basically why are the so f'ed up? PLO keeps inciting them. How do you think this nation would react if a bunch of thugs kept killing its citizens? Israelis have shown remarkable restraint despite numerous provocations. \_ that's pretty ridiculous. "the fightning" has been going on for thousands of years. read the bible. it's probably the only true bit. \_ restraint? Almost all the deaths over the past three weeks were Arab deaths. As of this morning, it was 7 Israelis and 90+ Palestinians that died. \_ The PLO started the killing. The Israelis are defending themselves. Besides its all that dick head Clintons' fault. He pushed the Israelis and the PLO too far too fast in the hopes of making himself look good. Its not our place to force other nations to the peace table. \_ This is deliberate. The Israelis cannot exchange one life for another given the population disparities. \_ what is the intent of your question? is it to incite thought or comments? it does a pretty poor job. if you're just looking for an answer, the answer is "no." -ali \_ why do you appear to be offended ali? It's just a naive question coming from a stupid ignorameous. \_ or a troll. \_ I find it hard to understand why these people feel they need to resort to such actions. Do they think that they can be violent without inciting a response? What is it \_ Several religions are notably peaceful: Hinduism, Buddhism, Quaker(ism?). Of these only hindus are willing to take up arms in *extereme* cases. about that religion that makes people behave in the most irrational ways? \_ Because they are completely f'ed up. \_ let me assume that by "that relgion" you mean "the arab religion" in which case i would have to reply with "you fucking imbecile. learn some culture before you decide you have an opinion about something," thus swiftly dismissing the discussion. -ali \_ He means Islam. Most arabs are also Muslims. Don't be a greater idiot than usual ali. \_ which is even worse. he's saying that the act was incited by religion. that's bullshit. i think culture in general had a lot more to do with it. if he wants to say "religion has a greater influence in their culture than anything else" then i'll still have to call him an idiot. the implied causality in his question is completely fatuous. \_ I don't understand why these people act in the manner that they do. My understanding is that they are driven by the "will of god" (as they percieve it), thus I conclude that thier religion (if you can all it a religion) leads them to it. There is also historical precedence for followers that particular "religion" inciting conflicts where it is unnecessary, the Moors in Spain, the Sultans in India, etc. \_ As opposed to the Christians who brought the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, and numerous other atrocities in the name of their religion. \_ Um, as I recall the reformation corrected most of these problems. How come there hasn't been a similar move in islam? \_ To expect reformation from a people whose heritage includes murdering their prophets chosen successor is the height of stupidity. \_ palestinians might be driven by the hopeless desperation intrinsic in being systematically oppressed and denied fundamental human rights. think about it. \_ NOT! The PLO is a bunch of murdering thugs. They would be criminals whether or not they were "oppressed". If you wish to speak about oppressed people in the Middle East, only the Israelis fall into that category. \_ israel has violated numerous international human rights laws. palestinian refugees don't even have the right to return. look at the facts. zionism is racism. \_ Both the Palestinians and the Jews have a reasonable claim to the same piece of land. Because of various reasons, mostly religious, a significant minority of each party is not willing to consider the others position and is willing to resort to any provocation, including mass murder and terrorism, to advance their agenda. In such a situation, no peace is possible -ausman \_ Israel has reacted in the only fesiable way. If America was surrounded by enemies we would arm our borders and take enemy land to buffer our people as much as possible. Don't give me that human rights bs. Israel MPs did not order hits and bombings on civilian targets for terrorizing people into getting what they want. The PLO did that. They are criminals and those that stand with them are criminals also. \_ you sound like a brainwashed zionist. \_ Refute the argument you anti-semitic pig. \_ how does anti-semitism fit into this? it's anti- zionism. \_ you sound like a brainwashed Hamas idiot. \_ I believe that the terms "brainwashed" and "idiot" are superflous when used to refer to the Hamas. Membership to that elite organization requires a level of mental capacity which is rarely seen in most humans (at least ones that are born with a brain). \_ No, it's religion in general. All religions are about equally fucked up. The jews and their state, the Muslims and their jihad, the Mormons with their preaching/ converting, the Christians with their Crusades. \_ There are several religions which are peaceful. Hindus, Buddhists, Quakers. \_ Hindus have a reputation for fighting. Well, India does, to say the least. Put three hindus in a room and you get three points of view. \_ Disagreement is different than resorting to violence. Hindus are extremely risk averse, and will chose to take up arms only if all other options have failed. \_ Religion is a sham and a crutch for weak-minded people who need strength in numbers. \_ If you believe this, you do not understand religion. Read a book by Joseph Campbell and perhaps you will understand. Oops, I forgot you and your WWF brothers don't know how to read. \_ I am very well read in Joseph Campbell. Jesse may or may not have good reasons for his belief, but the idea itself is sound. \_ How can it possibly be sound? Please clarify. \_ Let's take religions that define a god. None of these gods exists as described. \_ What Campbell books have you read? I'm not sure how you arrived at this conclusion, but you have not understood eastern religions at all, specifically hinduism. In hinduism God is defined as all that is. Only God exists, all else is just an aspect of God. \_ Arguing about hinduism and many Eastern religions can get very hairy (many are more philosophies than religions), and becomes distracting from the core argument. When we talk about traditional Christianity, the notion that the Christian God does not exist is much more self-evident. \_ From my readings of christian texts written by christian saints, the concept of God is similar to that of many eastern religions. I think that perhaps the traditional Catholic or Protestant view of God may be incomplete though. \_ From my reading of the Bible, the Christian God is an entity as well as a concept. This entity does not exist. \_ I admit that I have not read the bibile in its entirity. Perhaps the entity as described there in does not exist. But the original post does not specify a Christian God. \_ Is it not safe to assume that Jesse Ventura is speaking of, for the most part, Christians? I didn't read the whole Bible either; it's pretty clear after a few chapters, though, that the Christian God is put forth not only as a concept but an entity. \_ The US isn't going to nuke anyone ever again. The political fallout just ain't worth it. \_ This is a policy started by Truman. He was too scared to use the bomb that he hampered his generals in Korea from decisively winning that conflict leading to the diminished usefulness of our most powerful weapons. \_ Are you intentionally being a complete idiot? You might as well have said, the unfortunately outcome of WWII lead to the termination of Auschwitz as the most powerful killing machine the world has ever seen. Follow that by, can we just release biological weapons over the general vaccinity of the middle east? I'll bet you'd like to torture POW's, too. \_ You misunderstand my point. Why should we have weapons if we are too afraid to use them? \_ We SHOULDN'T HAVE NUKES! \_ I totally agree. We should replace our tactical nukes with space based weapons platforms. Big Guns in the Sky that can defend America's freedom from her enemies whereever they be. \_ If you play Civilization III, you'll realize the precedence of power in different civilizations: military units < religion < mass media < lawyers + injunctions To advance in civilization, you must research research research. As you approach industrialization and information revolution, you need units that are more deadly than the previous era but at the same time pose less physical threat. Religion served well as a weapon, but that era is over. \_ lol! Civilization III does not exist yet. It's Civ: CTP. |
2000/10/13-14 [Computer/Companies/Google, Computer/SW] UID:19474 Activity:nil |
10/13 StarOffice source released. http://www.openoffice.org |
2000/10/13-14 [Computer/Networking] UID:19475 Activity:nil |
10/13 I got a cable modem and I'm runing RH 6. My networking is setup through DHCP. The problem is that when I log in to GNOME or try to start apache I get a message about not being able to determine the local host name. This prevents apache from running and also causes problems when I ssh to my home machine from outside. How do I fix this? Thanks. \_ fix /etc/resolv.conf. Also you should set ServerName in httpd.conf |
2000/10/13-14 [Uncategorized/Profanity] UID:19476 Activity:nil |
10/13 Fuck geekporn: http://www.angelfire.com/la/aureolis/book.html \_ aren't those the switchblade symphony chicks? \_ not all of them \_ I dont get it. where's the pr0n? |
2000/10/13-15 [Reference/Religion] UID:19477 Activity:high |
10/13 Regarding the discussion below, is Muslim the proper term for those people who live in the Middle East, North Africa, Persia and follow (to varying degrees) the teachings of Mohamad? \_ a guy i work with who is one of the brightest, most multitaleneted, fun to work with , hard working people it's ever been my privelage to work with is a muslim, and he's from new york. -a jew who is not a predjudiced asshole \_ He must not be a practicing muslim, as the attributes you describe he has are mutually exclusive to the practice of islam. \_ Muslim is the name for followers of the religion of Islam. \_ In my language Mohamad rougly translates to "Exterme Imbicile". Thus his followers can be refered to as Extereme Imbiciles. \_ which language, if serious? \_ The term Mohamaden is used to describe Muslims. This is general written Maha (meaning great/extereme) and Mudan (meaning imbicile/idiot) in most Indian languages. \_ "most" -- indoeuropean or dravidian? \_ I would say most sanskrit (indoeuropean) based languages. Dravidian "languages" is somewhat of an oxymoron, as they are most closely related to primitive grunting than a real language. Most scholars consider dravidian "language" forms to be the native language forms of india, since sanskirt was introduced much later by the vedic invaders whose origin is much disputed. |
2000/10/13 [Uncategorized] UID:19478 Activity:nil 75%like:19480 |
10/11 Are there any places with both guys and girls dancing. GF wants to go see guys, but says I can come along. But I want to see girls. |
2000/10/13-16 [Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:19479 Activity:nil 53%like:19493 |
10/13 I have Windows 98 OSR 2. Is it worth upgrading to Windows 2000? Any compatibility issues with games? \_ lol! If there's anything to upgrade for you, it is Windows ME. not Win2k. Win2k are for Business Environment. For regular home users, it'll be an overkill. \_ lol! \_ lol! Don't listen to these sons of goats. Win2k is fine for most newer games. lol! \_ lol! \_ Win2k has loads of compatibility issues with games - it's just not a gaming environment. \_ Also won't work with your random cheapo peripheral (think: webcam, funky sound input card, etc etc) |
2000/10/13-14 [Uncategorized] UID:19480 Activity:kinda low 75%like:19478 |
10/11 What are the good places to see guys stripdancing. Are there any places with both guys and girls dancing. GF wants to go see guys, but says I can come along. But I want to see girls. \_ You're Wormfood Dude! Ditch the Bitch. |
4/15 |