| ||||||
| 2000/9/10 [Computer/SW/OS/Windows] UID:19218 Activity:insanely high |
9/10 No, I don't like Bill Gates and WinBlows. However, I really need it
cuz of the apps that run on it. The question I have is, is Win2K
worth it over Win98? Please don't post 'format, get FreeBSD/Linux' Thx
\_ will someone port cakewalk already?
worth it over Win98? Please don't post 'format, get FreeBSD/Linux' Thx
\_ the IT people where I work said that it is still too unstable and
buggy to switch to(they won't support it.) thay said that it will
be an improvement when it has been debugged, and that they will
"let us know when it no longer sucks".
\_ This is the traditional "Wait until the Service Pack answer".
For mid- to large-size corporations this is true (Active
Directory is hard to configure). If you're small, the benefits
from Win2K far outweigh consequences, compared to WinNT4.
\_ Yes, if you're not paying for it.
\_ I agree.
\_ format. Install FreeBSD/Linux. Install VMware. Run Win98.
\_ clarification:
Win2000 = new version of WinNT
WinME = new version of Win98
(where ME stands for Mellinium Edition)
Why they switched their naming convention to have their "server"
OS go from letters to numbers and desktop OS to go from numbers
to letters is beyond me.
\_ Quite simple - Win2000 was supposed to be the "unifying"
release for everyone to run. Then they saw how completely
unusable it was for most home users and had to come up
with a new name for ME, which was supposed to be the last
"consumer" release, but they're now working on another
version for 2001, currently code-named "Whistler", and the
Great Unified OS dream has been put off several more years.
\_ not being able to track memory leaks in
Win98 drives me insane.
Win2k has stability and is easier to admin.
The only problem is with the lack of good
driver support.
\_ Not being able to track memory leaks in
WinNT4 drives my cube mate insane. Muhahaha! |
| 2000/9/10-11 [Computer/SW] UID:19219 Activity:nil |
9/10 How do I setup a kill file for news?
\_ Application dependent.
\_ I'm using gnus and slrn
\- you use gnus and are asking on the motd?
\_ also slrn |
| 2000/9/10-12 [Computer/SW/OS/FreeBSD] UID:19220 Activity:high |
9/10 using: win2k wanted: good firewall pkg. recommendationsP
good defind as something you have used, and are comfortable
with and have the least amount of hatred for.
\_ I recommend ipf, you need to install a helper environment
in order to get it running, a little environment named
OpenBSD!
\_ Dork. The person wants WinRoute. --openbsd/win2k user
\_ Running a firewall using Lose2k or an MS OS
is like building a castle, but leaving the
drawbridge down, the portcullius up and the
doors open. There is no point. What he needs
is ipf, and he should be running it using
OpenBSD. For him, ipf is the app, and OpenBSD
is the lib. Yeah, installing the lib wipes
Lose2K, but that is a good thing.
\_ Paolo, shut the fuck up.
\_ I'm not Paolo, I'm #1 *BSD FAN!
\_ Hi. I really did mean 2k. I run
ipf on the other half of the machine
and no, it's not buff enough for vmware.
\_ Like if you ever used WinRoute or w2k you might
know what you're talking about. OpenBSD isn't the
answer to every question unless your toolshed only
has a hammer.
\_ Lose2K isn't the answer to any question.
In fact if M$ is the answer to any question,
you are asking the wrong question.
\_ Some of us live and work in the real world
where your religious point of view won't
fly. So what's the answer for the busdev
and sales people who want powerpoint style
presentations, excel style spreadsheets,
and exchange style calendaring? There isn't
plug in. Needless to say, they don't use the openbsd side
a better set of apps on the unix side for
these sorts of things than MS has. It's
time to leave the church and try something
secular. -unix admin
\_ You're apparently looking for something free, but numerous
colleagues of mine (mostly unix-heavy) have liked Axent Raptor
pretty well. Of course, it pretty much rips out all the Wincrap
and leaves the pretty interface. Regarding IPF, is there any
possibility you can put a dedicated OpenBSD/ipf box in front of
the Windows machine? Leaving a Windows box on an open net is
a fairly risky proposition, especially since Win2k probably
hasn't most of its security bugs exposed yet... -John
\_ rock on. thanks. this was the type of answer I was looking
for. This is a laptop. It dual boots w/ 2k. At work,
it's jacked in behind an openBSD firewall; so no problem
the issue is that this z505s is a presentation machine and
the biz team likes to take it to various locales and
plug in. Needless to say, they don't use the unix side
of the machine.
\_ What I was getting at though is that I don't know whether
you can really use Win2k as such under Raptor, since it
really claims to rip everything out, install its own "OS"
and leaves the Windows GUI. If you're using the laptop
productively, I'd recommend looking for some sort of
hardening programs that close ports and kill services.
You may want a look at http://securityfocus.com to see what you
can do manually. -John |