3/31 I'm sick and tired of people claiming: "only merit should
matter", without defining merit. Does merit mean IQ? Or does it
mean "number of publications", or "number of hours worked gratis
for the SPCA", or perhaps "GPA+SAT+GRE+ACT/23skidoo"??? What a
bunch of rich fucking whiners. Live in a projects area for a
while, then come back and talk to me about merit.
\_ Just because *you* have trouble defining it doesn't mean others do.
Merit is your worth to the job, school, whatever. It's what you
contribute and "bring to the table". Some black junky whore brings
nothing. She had it tough as a kid? So what? Life is tough all
over. Life is unfair. Trying to force "fairness" into life only
makes it unfair for those more fit. Those who have merit suffer
while losers advance for no reason other than to make certain
powerful figures on the left feel good. The same powerful figures
who are unharmed by their ill conceived and poorly executed
policies of arbitrary unfairness.
\_ By your definition, it should be able to buy Merit with
Money. Since Money brings a lot to the table, people
with Money should have a lot of Merit. NOTE: I think
that some amount of Merit should be purchasable with
Money. If you have Money you should be able to buy
a undergrad and possibly a graduate degree (including
PHD) at a reputable school. What's the point of having
Money if you can't use it to buy the things that you
want.
\_ Hello? Context? Sure, if you work for a company and
_you_pay_them_ to work there then I guess you're bringing
quite a bit to the table. Uhm, yeah, whatever. This is
an incredibly stupid straw man argument. No. That is
*not* my definition of merit. I want my VC to have cash,
I want my company to pay me cash, but I don't expect my
employees to pay me to work at my company, nor my
students to pay me for a grade. Get real. I said
*nothing* like that and you know it.
\_ Money is one thing you can bring to the table, so in
places where money is important, having money equals
having merit. But you cannot buy ability with money,
and people care about ability, not degrees. So even
if you buy a good looking degree, which is certainly
possible, you will not fool anyone in the workplace
for long unless you have something to back that degree
up.
\_ Hey, I think people should be able to buy whatever
they want with their money (including an
educational degree). --Stanford MSEECS student.
\_ Who gets the cash though? If I can get a cut,
I'd have no problem with it.
\_ Merit at a company is how well you contribute. Merit in school
is how well you know your subject. Merit is NOT the colour of
your skin, or the past history of your ethnic group.
\_ what index do they accept at EECS these days? Does a 4.0+
GPA count for more than 4000 points?
\_ No. And if you want to get into EECS, the 500 to 700
extra points you have shouldn't matter since your SAT I&II
+ your 4000 GPA will put your over the 7700 mark. Also
4.0 in HS means jack at Cal since almost everyone was
4.0 in HS.
\_ I was 3.34 in HS! -blojo
\_ That explains a lot.
\_ man, jon, being a slacker was cool in the eighties,
maybe, or whenever it was Judd Nelson was cool. In
this day and age, cool = college superstar. get with
it, you aging hipster. -ali
\_ well, at least some of us look better than
these college superstars...
\_ "college superstar" = big fish, small bowl,
no car, noodle ramen diet. -John
\_ what are you talking about? 500 - 700 extra points? 4.0+ GPA?
they removed GPA weighting over 2 years ago.
\_ merit is growing up with a silver spoon up your ass, having
your mommie and daddie get you into good schools and giving
you your high-achieving psychie so that you can earn their
love. then you get to bitch about merit to kids that don't
get the same as you did, but somehow should have done just
as well as you even though they have to dodge bullets, drugs,
and gangs.
\_ Waaaah! This troll brought to you by silver spoon silly boy on
the motd.
\_ Losers. Stop bitching and go get some fucking work done.
\_ hey, the man's got a point. |