Berkeley CSUA MOTD:1999:December:02 Thursday <Wednesday, Friday>
Berkeley CSUA MOTD
 
WIKI | FAQ | Tech FAQ
http://csua.com/feed/
1999/12/2 [Uncategorized] UID:16989 Activity:very high
12/2 At Tuesday's WTO protest, 20 demonstrators from Humboldt County
     used lock boxes to link themselves in a circle. As supporters
     gathered around them, you could see thick clouds of tear gas at
     the next intersection down the hill, where police were dispersing
     a crowd. Calls went up for vinegar and rags to cover the faces of
     the blockaders, who calmly sat and waited.  An hour or so later,
     the police arrived and asked the blockaders to leave.  When they
     refused, cops went around the circle, pepper-spraying the
     activists in the face. They didn't unlock. The police sprayed
     again. Still the blockaders stayed firm. After two more attempts,
     the police finally gave up, ceding the intersection to the
     protesters.
           \_ of course, this idea does not exclude the similar idea that
              the WTO rioters all deserve a swift kick to the head while
              being dunked in toilet water diarrhea.  Moron fuck-ups. (again)
                \_ these weren't rioters
        (Why isn't this considered brutality?)
        \_ Ok, smartguy, ignore the fact that this was a WTO protest.
           Think generically. Protesters refusing to leave. How, as a
           policeman, would you have made them move?
           \_ cut locks.  Pick them up.  Move them.  I am thinking generically
           \_ My incredible mental powers.  Barring that, my magnetic
              personality and incredible good looks.
           \_ Well gee, I guess I would have pepper sprayed them right in the
              face a few times in violation of my training on the correct and
              safe use of pepper spray and then just left to go get some beer.
              What would you have done, not ignoring the fact that no matter
              their politics, they are still human beings and you don't do
              that to another human being, especially for some stupid reason
              like "they were blocking the street"?
              \_ They were blocking the street to get attention. They got
                 their attention. They knew the risks. (If they didn't,
                 then they're incredibly stupid, given the history of
                 protests and police action). And they're policemen. They
                 don't go have beers on duty. They do their job. Yes, I
                 consider use of pepper spray more in line with their job
                 than to blow off their assignments and hit the bars. Oh,
                 and they were blockading, which I assume (correct me if I'm
                 wrong) they were preventing people from crossing (or am I
                 not getting the definition of 'blockade'?) if i wanted to
                 cross, i damn well would approve of the police taking
                 necessary action for me to cross.
                 \_ there are many ways to deal with the situation that don't
                    involve pepper spray to the face.  Pepper spray has been
                    known to kill people it is so toxic.  I mena if they
                    started shooting people I'm sure htat would have worked
                    too.  Doesn't mean it is the right way to go about things.
                        \_ Peanut butter has been known to kill people it
                           is so toxic.  Don't be a freak.
                            \_I hope this is bait and not ignorance.
                              \_ No, it's true.  Some people are so
                                 allergic to peanuts that they'll die
                                 if they eat them.
                        \_ Why is it that computer science majors in
                                general don't believe in human rights?
                           \_ I don't know that you can generalize from
                              the bozos that post to the motd to CS majors
                              in general
1999/12/2-6 [Computer/HW/Drives] UID:16990 Activity:kinda low
i12/2   HEY IDIOT, THESE ARE YOUR PEERS, MAYBE YOU SHOULD DEAL WITH
        THEM.
        7056    akyan       7096    eyip
        7464    toddlee     7776    dana
        7888    jennylau    8112    muchandr
        8560    scharpen    10352   norby
        11120   jose        12920   glorial

        At some point, users have to deal with each other.  Relying
        on root on this machine to do that for you is childish and
        immature.  Phillip.
 _   _ _______   __  ____   ___   ___ _____
| | | | ____\ \ / / |  _ \ / _ \ / _ \_   _|
| |_| |  _|  \ V /  | |_) | | | | | | || |
|  _  | |___  | |   |  _ <| |_| | |_| || |_
        \_ Let's start an e-mail petition!!  Just add your name to the
           list and forward it to your favorite soda peers!
 _   _ _______   __  ____   ___   ___ _____
| | | | ____\ \ / / |  _ \ / _ \ / _ \_   _|
| |_| |  _|  \ V /  | |_) | | | | | | || |
|  _  | |___  | |   |  _ <| |_| | |_| || |_
|_| |_|_____| |_|   |_| \_\\___/ \___/ |_( )
                                         |/
    __                 __               _ _   ___ ____
   / /_   ____ _ _ __ / / __ ___   __ _(_) | |_ _/ ___|
  / /\ \ / / _` | '__/ / '_ ` _ \ / _` | | |  | |\___ \
 / /  \ V / (_| | | / /| | | | | | (_| | | |  | | ___) |
/_/    \_/ \__,_|_|/_/ |_| |_| |_|\__,_|_|_| |___|____/

 _____ _   _ _     _
|  ___| | | | |   | |
| |_  | | | | |   | |
|  _| | |_| | |___| |___ _
|_|    \___/|_____|_____(_)
        \_ We have no power over them.  empower me (with root!) and I
           will deal with them ...
        [figlet deleted]
        \_ why dont we reconfigure the local mail agents to put user
           mailboxes in user home directories?  Then we wont' need
           a separate mail partition, and user quotas are handled
           better.  -ERic
           \_ because that idea got shot down the day it was suggested
              -- cassandra
              \_ on what grounds?
                \_ On the grounds that mail hogs couldn't hog anymore?
                 \_ a moreimportant question is "By who"? and the
                    corrolary, "Where are the losers now, so we can
                    safely ignore them?"
           \_ we do this at work and it sucks.  don't do it unless the
              sendmail or equivalent is on the same host w/ the home dirs
              (not NFS mounts) and the home disks are as reliable as the
              the user mail spool disks.  otherwise mail gets lost
              and/or delayed w/ all the flaky home disk failures.
                \_ Hellloooo... soda runs sendmail on the same box as your
                   home.  Disks of the same type are about equally reliable.
                   Why would you claim the home disks are less reliable than
                   the mail disks?  Did your IT guys say, "hey! I know! Lets
                   buy refurb disks for the home dirs!  we like doing full
                   system restores!!!"?  Unlikely.  Please stop babbling
                   about the sky falling on your mail spool.
                   \_ I think he's speaking in more general terms. And
                      yes, some storage is more reliable. For example,
                      network-attached storage RAID 1/0 is more reliable than
                      flaky full-height 1991-vintage disk drives striped
                      RAID 0. You said "same type" but that wasn't
                      originally implied. --dim
                        \_ If he's speaking in general terms then he's
                           babbling spew since the topic was very specifically
                           about mail spools on soda.  Not network attached
                           raid at work, not an 8 year old disk, not some
                           bullshit scenario you're likely to conjure to make
                           a false point.  Mail spools on soda belong in
                           home directories or the spools themselves should
                           be hard quoted at a low number like 2 megs.  Deal
                           with your fucking mail and it won't be a problem.
                           \_ most of the people on root either dont leave
                              their mail on soda or at least have it delivered
                              via .forward to another filesystem.
                                \_ Something others should think about.
        \_ HEY PHILLIP, HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO 'DEAL' WITH OUR PEERS?  SEND
           THEM E-MAIL EXPRESSING OUR DISAPPOINTMENT AT THE FULLNESS OF THEIR
           MAIL SPOOLS?  USE THOUGHTWAVES TO COMPEL THEM TO READ THE MOTD AND
           FEEL DEEP SHAME ABOUT THE CONTEXT IN WHICH THEIR NAME APPEARS
           THEREIN?  OR PAY OUR HOMIES TO TAKE OUT A HIT ON THESE NON-PLAYAS?
            \_ Shotguns.  Phillip.
           \_ alias annoy 'echo ^G >>/dev/`who | grep \!:1 | cut -c 10-15`'
                \_ mesg n
1999/12/2-3 [Consumer/CellPhone] UID:16991 Activity:kinda low
12/2    What's the difference between Nokia 6160, 6162, 6192, and 6190?
        They all look the same!
        \_ Unfortunately, nobody can be told what the matrix is.
        \_ 6162 and 6192 have the flip. All are functionally the same.
           The 616X uses TDMA technology (specifically for CellularOne)
           while 619x uses GSM technology (specifically for Pacbell).
           \_ 619x (or is it 618x) can be used with CellularOne.
                \_ 6185 works with Sprint PCS.  No flip.
                \_ No, 619x can only be used with Pac Bell, these are the
                phones with smart chip . Only PacBell support smart chips.
                        \ WTF is a smart chip ?
                   \_ Yes.  All other phones use Idiot Chips.
1999/12/2 [Computer/SW/Database] UID:16992 Activity:high
12/2    Kudos to http://Amazon.com and http://yahoo.com. They are 10X faster (in web
        page responce time) than http://cdnow.com, <DEAD>bn.com<DEAD>, http://borders.com, etc.
        Does anyone know what kind of DB backends these web sites use?
        \_ I've heard that yahoo! uses sleepycat.
        \_ Response time isn't solely limited to DB backends.  They may
           split up incoming requests to more machines or use caching
           accelerators, etc.
Berkeley CSUA MOTD:1999:December:02 Thursday <Wednesday, Friday>