6/4 http://Amazon.com wanx. Amazon lets the publishers have access to
customer reviews two days BEFORE they are actually posted,
giving them time to write up two or three 'good' reviews
the same day the 'not-so-good' review comes out. Eg., look
for books written by Steve S. Miller, published by McGraw Hill.
His books absolutely suck, but he somehow has all these
totally cheesy reviews posted by anonymous readers who all
say the same overly complimentary things. Stuff you'd never
find on the Soda motd.
\_ sounds legal and like standard business practice to me
\-while i think this kind of disclosure/discussion is useful, i dont
look to amazon for book reviews ... i want one thing from them and
that is cheap prices and decent customer service. in my experience
"truth" comes out of a dialectic ... from reading multiple sources.
generally you shouldnt look for "one relaible source" ... unless
it is me or the ecomonist. --psb
\_ Uh, The Economist has its idiosyncracies too (e.g., declaring that
Clinton should resign the week Monica-gate broke: a little
premature, as they themselves later admited) --Economist Reader |