| ||||||
| 1998/3/4 [Politics/Domestic] UID:13753 Activity:moderate |
3/3 Recent MSNBC headline: "American Beats Out Kwan"
*sigh*
\_ Ya, so? You expected better from Gatesnbc news?
\_ not how I would have worded it, but it's hardly inaccurate
\_ Not how I would have put it, but is this inaccurate?
And stop censoring me, arselick. |
| 1998/3/4 [Computer/Rants] UID:13754 Activity:nil |
3/3 For those who said Jim Barksdale "admitted to being a Bill Gates
admirer", read CNET's homepage today. The main headline is:
"Gates gets grilled by Senate, Jim Barksdale and Scott McNealy." |
| 1998/3/4 [Uncategorized] UID:13755 Activity:nil |
3/3 [All Jim Barksdale crap removed] |
| 1998/3/4 [Computer/HW/CPU] UID:13756 Activity:nil 57%like:13758 |
3/3 Intel is cool in my book now. They adopted StrongARM.
Well, Merced looks pretty good too. -muchandr
\_ And you told me not to work there ;) -emarkp |
| 1998/3/4 [Recreation/Food/Alcohol] UID:13757 Activity:nil |
3/4 Support the smoking ban!
The smoking ban is an unreasonable peice of legislation. It
is a ban. That means that there are no exceptions no matter
what. The next step is to ban smoking in any room containing
more than ten people where alcohol is served because that is
just like a bar. Even if it is your home or workplace.-nesim
\_ The ban does have exceptions: namely when the bar is operated
entirely by the owners. If you want to die from second-hand
smoke, you're free to do so. You're not allowed to have working
conditions that force your employees to do the same.
\_ sounds sensible. you're not one of those nasty smokers, by
chance?
\_ the difference between alcohol and smoking is smoking affect
other people, where as alcohol doesn't.
\_ How many drunk drivers kill people every year?
\_ I am sick and tired of people smoke in public areas. If I
died of 2nd hand smoking, I will come back as a ghost and
take a fucking smoker with me.
\_ Just one?
\_ Bars aren't public places. Even without smoking they are pretty
bad for your health. |
| 1998/3/4 [Computer/HW/CPU] UID:13758 Activity:nil 57%like:13756 |
3/3 Intel is cool in my book now. They adopted StrongARM.
\_ they're killing StorngARM, by jacking up licensing or somesuch,
I hear.
Well, Merced looks pretty good too. -muchandr
\_ And you told me not to work there ;) -emarkp
\_ I am not saying it is a good place to work. They are cool
for finally recognizing that x86 must die. -muchandr
\_ I think they've been aware the x86 needed to die a long time ago
but market forces prevailed over technology choices. You can't
just up and change your basic cpu architecture over night and
expect everyone will just recompile their OS, apps, reinstall,
buy new chips, all new whatever, etc, etc, just because you made
a poor long term architectural decision as a company 15+ years
earlier.
\_ Apple, PowerPC. Whatever you think of the platform, the
transition itself was comfortable and smooth (simile
self-censored) -pld
\_ Much like when I make love. -anonymous
\_ It was reasonably smooth. There are still problems running
old software on the new platform. It wasn't perfect. That
means lost money to some companies (customers) who would
see the hassle but not the benefit (I don't entirely agree
with this attitude but its the way things are). Thus,
squeezing every last drop out of the x86 was a better move
for Intel than trying to switch to something else (what?)
and do emulation/translation. Maybe the merced or whatever
will be the cool next step and whatever comes after won't
do x86 at all. But given the incredibly deep level of
x86 entrenchment, I doubt you'll see an x86 free world in
less than 10 to 15 years. The current line of chips from
the 486 to P][ are powerful enough for what the bulk of
business users need a computer for. They're not going to
switch and upgrade everything just because a new version
of something is out there. That costs money. |
| 1998/3/4-5 [Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Troll, Academia/Berkeley/CSUA/Motd] UID:13761 Activity:very high 80%like:14293 80%like:13983 |
03/04 motd nuked
\_ Awaiting the fallout...
\_ Cool! - #1 Motd Anti-Fan
\_ If you were with it, you know that you can't combine
fandom, a positive, with anti-anything, a negative.
\_ This makes absolutely no logical sense.
\_ Obviously you're not with it. End of story.
\_ Bastard [...]
\_ try again. --#2 psb fan
\_ aw, I missed it. What'd he say? -psb #1 Fan
\-yeah, what did i say? --OTPSB
\_ Bastard motherfucker smallminded bastard censor fascist pig. When
the brownshirted dictator oppressors come to your house to round
_you_ up and take you to the death camp for daring to think thoughts
that _they_ found unacceptable, don't expect me to cry for you,
bastard. Rather, I'll spit on your cold, unmarked grave.
Remember that the long slow slide toward complete erosion of our
personal freedom of expression started right here, right now, today
with the smallminded censors of the glorious soda wall.
\_ i.e. you suck? |
| 1998/3/4 [Politics/Domestic/California, Recreation/Dating] UID:49812 Activity:nil |
3/4 Can someone post the age of consent again? Thanks. I remember
Hawaii is 14, California is 18, what else?
Age of Consent Laws in the United States
----------------------------------------
Age 14: Hawaii, Pennsylvania
15: Colorado, South Carolina
16: Alabama, Connecticut, Deleware, District of Columbia,
Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana,
Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North
Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Dakata, Utah, Vermont,
Washington, West Virginia, Wyoming
17: Louisiana, Missouri, New Mexico, New York, Texas
18: Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, Calif., Florida, Idaho,
Illinois, Mississippi, North Dakata, Oklahoma, Oregon,
Tennessee, Virginia, Wisconsin
I suggest checking out Hawaii :) |