1/8 thread rearranged. I have a "solution"
the draft says "Eligibility to Use Campus Email"
CSUA will just have to restrict /usr/lib/sendmail
for use by students only. Alumni cant use email... wheee!!!
\_ Members of group "alumni" will also be forbidden from
using trn/tin/pine/etc. as newsgroups are defined as
a form of e-mail by the policy.
\_ YOU LOSE. UCB HAS BANNED ALL ALUMNI ACCOUNTS ON ALL
*.BERKELEY.EDU MACHINES EFFECTIVE 1/1/97. (Be
prepared to say goodbye to your soda accounts soon.)
\_ Perhaps we could push for some kind of precedent that would
allow alumni organizations to allow alumnis accounts for the
sole purpose of conducting University-related discourse?
\_ Don't forget about all the job recommendations and
general advice/wisdom to be gotten from alumni.
If the CSUA kills my Berkeley account, then I
won't have much of a link to current Berkeley
students.
\_ The CSUA doesn't want to remove alumni accounts.
We know alumni are good. If we are forced to it
will only be because everything else we've tried,
including appeals to the Chancellor have failed.
This isn't over yet - it hasn't even started.
\_ Darn. I wish I had gone to Stanfurd. The graduates
there get accounts at http://alumni.stanford.org.
But then again, they give money to the school.
If IS&T won't let me have an alumni account,
I won't give money to the school. I know at
Davis you pay a flat fee of $500 or so to
get lifetime alumni library privileges,
discounts, and maybe an e-mail account too?
Is there something like this from the
Cal Alumni Association? --pcjr
\_ The alumni association uses the campus net
connection and is also prohibited from giving
out alumni accounts. They will set you up with
a deal with Netcom though. -alanc-
\_ What is the deal with Netcom though?
Can one choose an ISP?
Not having a Berkeley acct kinda
defeats the purpose of alumniship,
if you ask me. --pcjr
\_ For those who think this is a hoax, look at
http://uas.berkeley.edu:7355/emailpol/elig.html
and see if you can find any way to allow alumni
accounts given the limitations there.
\_ "Departments may provide email service to contractors,
independent consultants, or other qualifying
individuals for the sole purpose of conducting their
business with the University."
How about we all become Brian Harvey's personal
consultants. Unspecified tasks to be done, of course.
And we would work for free. -- lars
\_ we won't have to get rid of soda alumni accounts,
we just have to give a timeline for getting rid
of them, say 100 years after graduation..
\_ Get a clue, if you do that, IS&T will simplely close
the loophole very quickly.
\_ What might this mean for majordomo mailing lists run off
CSUA? Is this an inappropriate use of "campus email"? -stevie
\_ Not as far as anyone can find in the policy.
\_Is soda.csua "owned or operated by the University or any of
its sub-units"? If not, or if it's not well-defined, I don't
see what the fuss is about. It seems like the documents are
too vague for IS&T to have a point. -stevie
\_ IS&T has stated they consider any and all machines
connected to the campus network to be subject to this
policy, whether the University "owns" them or not. -alanc-
\_ Why? --- yuen
\_ Because alumni don't give money to IS&T and they're
jealous of all the other places on campus alumni do
get money (and they just figured out they can screw
over the rest of the campus this way)
\_ I thought CSUA is not under IS$T. Maybe they don't
even like the fact that non IS$T machines are using
campus ethernet. --- yuen
\_ IS&T runs the campus network - they make the
policies everyone connected to the network
(including the CSUA and people's home computers
using Home-IP or in-room dorm connections) must
follow. -alanc-
\_ So I can't allow my alumni friends to use
my computer? Golly. hahahhahahahhah
\_ Not if they're using
UCB's net connection. |